| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tazok
Guru
Joined: 25 Oct 2003
Posts: 310
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:29 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Deleted the old patch and ebuild, remerged and recompiled love-sources, but bootsplash still doesn't work as it should... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr3amwalker
n00b
Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 8
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tazok wrote: | | Deleted the old patch and ebuild, remerged and recompiled love-sources, but bootsplash still doesn't work as it should... |
weird, i've done the same as you, and I have bootsplash working
_________________
still walking dreams
2.6.6-rc3-love4 | linux: #353780 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elabdel
n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Posts: 71
Location: France
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for this patch, I 'm compiling the kernel with it. But i have a probleme whith the nvidia driver when using
[ ] Use register arguments (EXPERIMENTAL)
and/or
[ ] Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb
have you a patch for fix it ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spb
Retired Dev
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 2135
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| elabdel wrote: | Thanks for this patch, I 'm compiling the kernel with it. But i have a probleme whith the nvidia driver when using
[ ] Use register arguments (EXPERIMENTAL)
and/or
[ ] Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb
have you a patch for fix it ? |
4k stacks is known to break the nvidia module; that won't be fixed except by nvidia.
As for register arguments, that completely breaks binary compatibility, so nvidia has to either turn it on, or turn it off, and then insist that you use the same setting for your kernel. Since it's a relatively new option, they're sticking with backward compatibility, and it's off. That's my understanding, anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dinini
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 236
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elabdel
n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Posts: 71
Location: France
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, but what's really the performance with :
[ ] Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb
sorry, I can't speak english very much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PrakashP
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1249
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| minion.de has a patch so that nvidia binary works with regparm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ylin
n00b
Joined: 10 Apr 2004
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PrakashKC wrote: | @nforce trouble:
Could you please do a "dmesg|grep halt"? Does then "using C1 halt disconnect friendly idle threads." appear? If yes, you need to report to Ross Dickson (just post at lkml), so he gets in contact with to update the patch. I am now using the C1halt patch for a couple of days and system runs fine (and of course survives hdparm -t).
BTW, was the patch stable for you with past love kernel? I mean _I don't know whether Len's patch (which remaps timer irq to APIC, check with cat /proc/interrupts) is in vanilla kernel. |
Nothing appears on "dmesg|grep halt", though it's still hardlocking. :/
The last release with the C1halt patch wasn't more stable.
But with that new release bootsplash now works for me.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PrakashP
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1249
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Then I suspect steel300 didn't properly patch the kernel. I haven't tried this love sources, so I cannot tell for sure. But as you don't get the message I posted, the patch is not active and as such you get hard-lock-ups. steel300? Comments on this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
polle
Veteran
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1498
Location: Belgium
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ylin
n00b
Joined: 10 Apr 2004
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PrakashKC wrote: | | Then I suspect steel300 didn't properly patch the kernel. I haven't tried this love sources, so I cannot tell for sure. But as you don't get the message I posted, the patch is not active and as such you get hard-lock-ups. steel300? Comments on this? |
To be honest, I don't even find the patch in love. O_o
Have I missed something?
I'll try to patch it manually now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tazok
Guru
Joined: 25 Oct 2003
Posts: 310
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dr3amwalker wrote: | | Tazok wrote: | | Deleted the old patch and ebuild, remerged and recompiled love-sources, but bootsplash still doesn't work as it should... |
weird, i've done the same as you, and I have bootsplash working
|
I just cleaned /usr/portage/distfiles and /var/tmp/portage, did a digest for love-sources, remerged and recompiled it another time... didn't change anything.
This is the error-message I get: http://home.arcor.de/tazok/bootsplash.png |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ylin
n00b
Joined: 10 Apr 2004
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@PrakashKC
Could you send me a patched process.c as I seem to be unable to patch it myself?
Or do you have any ideas about it?
I'm always getting this error:
| Code: | LD init/built-in.o
HOSTCC usr/gen_init_cpio
CPIO usr/initramfs_data.cpio
GZIP usr/initramfs_data.cpio.gz
AS usr/initramfs_data.o
LD usr/built-in.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/process.o
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:52:4: invalid character '\240' in #if
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:112: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:112: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `c1halt_idle':
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:114: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:114: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:114: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:114: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:116:4: invalid character '\240' in #if
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:123: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:125: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:126: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:127: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:127: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c: At top level:
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:170: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:170: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `cpu_idle':
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:177: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:177: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:177: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:177: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:177: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:177: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `idle_setup':
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:232: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:232: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:235: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:235: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:236: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:236: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:236: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:236: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:236: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:236: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:238: error: stray '\240' in program
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:238: error: stray '\240' in program
make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2 |
I'd very appreciate it.
Last edited by Ylin on Sat May 01, 2004 3:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PrakashP
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1249
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the copy and paste and post f#cked up the tabs or alike. I'll send you the patch, so you can use it on future kernels, if necessary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzobelmont
Guru
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Location: Chiapas, Mexico
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| let's try 2.6.6-rc3-love2 aka "Peanutbutter Beachball Parade" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elabdel
n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Posts: 71
Location: France
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I compiled the love-sources with the last patch and bootsplash work nice now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elabdel
n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Posts: 71
Location: France
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
"compile without erros, bootsplash works fine but I get an error when I emerge nvidia-kernel:"
Try :
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge nvidia-kernel[/quote][/code] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
polle
Veteran
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1498
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the nvidia problem was cause by portage, an emerge rsync solved it, but there are new versions to test, so let's try |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
