View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ignis n00b
Joined: 25 Jun 2004 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2004 9:22 pm Post subject: Problem Loading Love Sources 2.6.7 8 |
|
|
hey, I have a problem loading the kernel, it's something with vesa frame buffer, but I don't really know what it is
when loading somethng like this appears and it stops, and freezes
Code: | <6>note Vesafb[27] exited with preempt_count2 |
Should I try 8kb kernel stackings? or that has nothing to do with it?
I have an nVidia RIVA TNT 2
Please, help
I am on pentium 3 700 mghz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
moocha Watchman
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 5722
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2004 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't use the framebuffer with NVidia cards. See here.
Additionally, a hint: I'd avoid CONFIG_PREEMPT if I were you. It hurts more than it helps. _________________ Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gandalf the White Guru
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Posts: 320 Location: Verdun, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
moocha wrote: | Don't use the framebuffer with NVidia cards. See here.
Additionally, a hint: I'd avoid CONFIG_PREEMPT if I were you. It hurts more than it helps. |
Uhhh, just to correct your post, there is nothing wrong with using framebuffer with nvidia cards, my geforce 4 gets along quite nicely with framebuffer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
moocha Watchman
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 5722
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gandalf the White wrote: | moocha wrote: | Don't use the framebuffer with NVidia cards. See here.
Additionally, a hint: I'd avoid CONFIG_PREEMPT if I were you. It hurts more than it helps. |
Uhhh, just to correct your post, there is nothing wrong with using framebuffer with nvidia cards, my geforce 4 gets along quite nicely with framebuffer. |
Oh... Haven't heard many success stories with mm-patchset based kernels and vesafb/rivafb on NVidia cards, so I thought I'd blanket them... _________________ Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gandalf the White Guru
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Posts: 320 Location: Verdun, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
moocha wrote: | Gandalf the White wrote: | moocha wrote: | Don't use the framebuffer with NVidia cards. See here.
Additionally, a hint: I'd avoid CONFIG_PREEMPT if I were you. It hurts more than it helps. |
Uhhh, just to correct your post, there is nothing wrong with using framebuffer with nvidia cards, my geforce 4 gets along quite nicely with framebuffer. |
Oh... Haven't heard many success stories with mm-patchset based kernels and vesafb/rivafb on NVidia cards, so I thought I'd blanket them... |
The new vesafb-tng patch takes care of it, works flawlessly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
X-Ryl669 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vesa tng doesn't work for me at all (I have a laptop LCD where the pixel clock must be 96.21Mhz). There are no option to set the pixel clock correctly in vesa-tng.
Moreover, even if you ask for respecting usual vbemode, it decides to choose its default, so the screen become unuseable.
I firmly advice NOT to USE VESA-TNG if you have a laptop (or a LCD screen) _________________ Think it twice, think it thrice, you never think enough... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|