| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pink
Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 1062
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:32 am Post subject: |
 |
|
dec:
you got that link from my post before, please?
[edit] nevermind, got hold of you on irc...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robin79
l33t
Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Posts: 632
Location: /home/valdemarsvik
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanx dec
_________________
Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------
Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spart
n00b
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| neenee wrote: | er sorry about that - i tried to update the ebuild with some minor
changes and apparently messed it up.
i reverted the link in the first post to point to boroshans' ebuild.
 |
The new ebuild works, thx. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ejohnson
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 140
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks a lot Neenee! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42
Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 5142
Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure it would be a good idea if this was marked testing, i.e. ~x86...
Anyways, source tarballs are curently downloading, Many Thanx, neenee!
_________________
~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pink
Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 1062
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| codergeek42 wrote: | | I'm pretty sure it would be a good idea if this was marked testing, i.e. ~x86... |
Let me get this straight:
You have to download the ebuild from the love-sources thread, obviously after reading this, if not other love-sources threads as well: thus knowing it is experimental and not supported by Gentoo.
You have to make the portage overlay and directory, and then ebuild blah digest it, from your portage overlay, knowing it is not in portage because it is an external and so not tested (by Gentoo) patch set.
You then have to emerge it, after which a very large and explicit warning comes up saying it may well break your system.
And you want it to have a ~x86 keyword?
What difference would this make, to anyone ?
Please don't take this as an attack, it's not, but really.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frodg
l33t
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 761
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I tend to agree
If you use love-sources you KNOW it is experimental 
You also know it will break your system eventually 
_________________
Aerosolo ergo sum - I spray therefore I am
Gentoo - Registered Linux User # 361400 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
m0sia
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 113
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| btw is usb & acpi problems still exisit in this release? 2.6.7-love8 don't work for me well, even i reversed bk-acpi and bk-usb patches. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
butters
Guru
Joined: 13 May 2002
Posts: 427
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey guys, how about a quick poll: of the latest love-sources (2.6.6+), which has given you the least problems and best performance?
It seems like a lot of winning and losing streaks since the days of the older, slightly more reliable love-sources.
Which patches have been the most troublesome?
Should this be its own thread?
_________________
If tugboats were bigger, they'd be the ones getting tugged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neenee
Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Posts: 1786
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
why not make it a thread about the performance of patches based
on mm, so that more people can contribute to the thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
