View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TheCoop Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
yup. added at http://thecoop.dyndns.org/openoffice-cvs-20040709.ebuild (same as last time) _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Building project sysui will fail
fix: strip off suse, redhat, solaris and win32 related stuff from /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-cvs-20040709/work/OpenOffice/sysui/prj/build.lst
1 hour compiling right now |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think so
but GCC 3.4 cvs or snapshot >20040709 needed for OOo 2.0
so 3.4.1-r1 is too old (needed patches not implemented...)
Build project wizards fails... no idea why... binary code errors |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
patched my GCC 3.4.1-r1 version also with enum patch
OOo Devs added module i18nutil into branch cws_680_gcc340fixes01
atm compiling OOo again to see if that error belongs to the enum issue... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
new ebuild will be up soon!
same servers new ebuild name: openoffice-cvs-20040717.ebuild
you have to update your GCC 3.4.1-r1 with the enum patch!
have fun...
new:
no rpm dependency
enum patch for gcc necessary!
Gentoo branding !!!
no more i18nutil fetch restriction... its in branch finally
i think thats it!
I am so happy jejejejejejejeje ... have a nice WE! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31640
it compiles for 1h and 30mins...
a small bug there but no idea how to fix... ill get into it now
oh yeah it will be fine soon i am twisted
how far are you and Lv with new GCC 3.4.1 ? that enum patch fixed another issue here! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheCoop Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
not newest but if u follow thread its easy to fix things
edit #1
TheCoop you got mail with OOo sources patch within and GCC patch warning |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
for any brave guy on AMD64 or IA64 out there you can test
cws_src680_ooo64bit02 (may be this helps, rob)
as branch in ebuild... its work in progress...
cws_src680_gcc340fixes01 - this branch is closed so no cvs update necessary atm. although it needs fixing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, star... i don't know how to handle that bug - that undefined variable... no idea how to set or change... i give it one more try...
the function sn_display_new is in libsn/sn-common.h. i included that file, too. there where sn.h got included. if that does not help. i have to wait for OOo Devs to fix that if they do.
or i should lower the cflags like the ebuild warning says hehehe ...lets see
could be cool if any C++ Professional helped here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thebell fixed a bug in licq some time ago
is licq c++? hehehe
well, my next o'reilly book will be about C++
edit #1
on IZ of OOo the gcc 3.4 fixes were mainly simple like:
before: variable / function
after: this->variable / this->function
or
before: function
after: ::class::function
but mine is slightly different |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think i found a proper patch for that saldisp.cxx file...
compiling atm ^^
edit #1
patch works! ill add on OOo issue... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
better use --disable-mozilla on configure...
i added patch for mozilla errors but i wont use it anymore to test
atm 2h 10mins compiling let's see how far this time without mozilla
sure less time hehehe... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
# genlop -c
* app-office/openoffice-cvs-20040717
current merge time: 3 hours, 26 minutes and 53 seconds.
ETA: unknown.
and 5~10 mins more and it fails... but the half is done its not because of OOo sources!
/usr/include/pthread.h is faulty... may be a typo...
line 427: __jmp_buf -> __jmp_buf_tag ... ill check it out
ill be back in ~3h 30mins.
edit #1
that file belongs to glibc... who is interested anyone calls Devs? to let them check? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, something is borked there. i will file an issue...
merged bison-1.875d (alpha version) and i try to use two processes for multiprocessing lets see how far it gets this time... and may be bison helps with that thread error... don't think so but who knows? anyone? no... owww
rob, whats up with amd64 and that 64bit branch - how far do you get compiling? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
geki wrote: | rob, whats up with amd64 and that 64bit branch - how far do you get compiling? |
Nowhere so far. I'm struggling with checking out two CVS branches - the 64-bit one, and the gcc-3.4 one - CVS doesn't appear to enjoy being asked to do that! Did you say that the gcc-3.4 branch was closed? If so, I can just create a patch... _________________ Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
emerge -U will kill your Gentoo
ecatmur, Lord of Portage Bash Scripts |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
last time i updated gcc34 branch it deleted some files of bridges module and now it breaks there telling bridges module needs to be rebuilt
I will talk to Devs whats up with that...
It is possible to check 2 CVS branches out in one ebuild?! How that?
edit #1
well, that OOo cvs does not do this. If you want to check out 2 branches do one manually... but to warn you... bridges module is f***ed in gcc34 branch if you have an old gcc34 branch checkout take it and tarball the bridges dir for me cuz mine is f***ed ...and please upload it somewhere so i can get it ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
got hopingly a new old bridges module of one Dev that will work
edit #1
also basic module error... got tarball of the dev
lets see where it will stuck next time... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
geki wrote: |
lets see where it will stuck next time...
|
well binfilter is borked... but got it tarballed from another dev... lets see now jejeje
edit #1
also seems that OOo 2 gets compatible to 64-bit sooner or later
and cws_src680_gcc340fixes01 branch should be clean on cvs server again - time to checkout very soon before it breaks again hehehe... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rob, for your case... i would get the gcc34 branch as base and then gettin the 64bit branch manually and patchin the gcc34 branch with the differences case-based |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|