KDE 3.3.0 Beta 2

Jakub · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 4:09 pm Post subject:

Get ready.. set... emerge!

firephoto · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 4:42 pm Post subject:

I could of put it on my other host but I figured I'd let spymac handle the little load it might generate. Spymac is pretty slow in general anyways.

I see the official ebuild are out now, time to try to track down the problem with kdepim. I couldn't get it to compile last night, it kept saying it couldn't find lartskde or it wasn't defined.

firephoto · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 4:59 pm Post subject:

Ok I'm still getting the error when I try to emerge kdepim.

Phemt · Apprentice Joined: 05 Apr 2003 Posts: 242

!!! ERROR: kde-base/kdebase-3.3.0_beta2 failed.
!!! Function inherit, Line 1102, Exitcode 1
!!! died sourcing /usr/portage/eclass/kde-dist.eclass in inherit()

aux_get(): (0) Error in kde-base/kdebase-3.3.0_beta2 ebuild. (1)
Check for syntax error or corruption in the ebuild. (--debug)

emerge: create(): aux_get() error on kde-base/kdebase-3.3.0_beta2; aborting...

i get this error

Shadowline · n00b Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 14

Calculating world dependencies \/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: /usr/portage/eclass/kde.eclass: line 160: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"'
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: /usr/portage/eclass/kde.eclass: line 175: syntax error: unexpected end of file

!!! ERROR: x11-themes/baghira-deco-0.4_pre failed.
!!! Function inherit, Line 1102, Exitcode 1
!!! died sourcing /usr/portage/eclass/kde.eclass in inherit()

aux_get(): (0) Error in x11-themes/baghira-deco-0.4_pre ebuild. (1)
Check for syntax error or corruption in the ebuild. (--debug)

...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 9) kde-base/kdetoys-3.3.0_beta2 to /
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: /usr/portage/eclass/kde.eclass: line 160: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"'
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: /usr/portage/eclass/kde.eclass: line 175: syntax error: unexpected end of file

!!! ERROR: kde-base/kdetoys-3.3.0_beta2 failed.
!!! Function inherit, Line 1102, Exitcode 1
!!! died sourcing /usr/portage/eclass/kde.eclass in inherit()

Gee, I guess I got a error to add also..... any ideas ?

Phemt · Apprentice Joined: 05 Apr 2003 Posts: 242

Phemt · Apprentice Joined: 05 Apr 2003 Posts: 242

mmm...everything it's now ok again after a sync

yog-sothoth · n00b Joined: 23 Jul 2004 Posts: 1

but... it probably just hasn't propagated to the repository I'm using.

In the meantime, for others that don't have an updated copy yet, the error is easily fixed:

On line 91 of /usr/portage/eclass/kde.eclass change the line:
myconf="$myconf `use_with arts`
to:
myconf="$myconf `use_with arts`"

firephoto · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:29 pm Post subject:

I just checked my kde.eclass and it doesn't have any reference to arts in it.

I finally got kdepim to emerge, I disabled unsermake and it compiled ok. Just have kdeutils left and everything will be updated except games, edu, and sdk.

himpierre · l33t Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 867 Location: Berlin

Everything compiled fine here on my amd64 in 64bit.

Thanks caleb.

t.

Shadowline · n00b Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 14

a sync fixed my problem....

UclaBob · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 83

An emerge sync shows the following Kde 3.3 Beta 2 ebuilds:

Jakub · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:42 pm Post subject:

As far as I can tell, all (or almost all) of them are there. Maybe check the /usr/portage/kde-base directories for specific ebuilds.

Moreover, they are listed here:
http://packages.gentoo.org/
so they should be available.

UclaBob · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 83

Yeah, oddly enough I have all of the ebuilds in the /usr/portage directories....however, I don't know why only some would show up after an emerge sync :?:

firephoto · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:14 pm Post subject:

It could be that those are the only packages in your world file? Either that or some of them got masked by something.

What does the following show?

Phemt · Apprentice Joined: 05 Apr 2003 Posts: 242

have some problems with kdemultimedia...it didn't compiled juk (I HAVE taglib installed) and didn't find ogg/vorbis support.
I use gcc 3.4.1 but with alpha, beta1 cvs and 3.2.x I didn't have this problem so I guess it's not gcc.

Phemt · Apprentice Joined: 05 Apr 2003 Posts: 242

firephoto · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 5:46 am Post subject:

These are the only dependencies that would seem to be needed by juk.
media-libs/taglib
media-sound/cdparanoia
media-sound/trm
encode media-sound/lame
flac media-libs/flac
oggvorbis media-libs/libvorbis
alsa media-libs/alsalib

You might try re-emerging all of them, and musicbrainz too if you don't have it. It goes along with trm.

p h a n t · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 7:34 am Post subject:

I cant restore maximized windows anymore

It's very strange, since it only happens with one specific user account (my main one unfortunately). I have already deleted all previous kde config files in ~, thus started "configuring from scratch again" - no luck. Does anyone experience the same behaviour? When I click the restore button nothing happens and the windows remain maximized. A right click on the title bar shows me a greyed [x] Maximize which can't be changed.

JLP · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 8:07 am Post subject:

I compile from CVS and I also have a similar problem. I can restore windows just fine. But Fullscreen mode doesn't work correctly for me in any application. It goies into FS just fine but when I try to get out of it it just remains in FS.

Oh and I have a problem with KOragnizer crashing even before it starts up. In libthread_db.so.1.

And playing notification sounds very quickly just freezes my whole machine completely

That is about it. Other things work very well.
_________________
Live long and prosper!

Raoul_Duke · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 8:54 am Post subject:

Is it a good idea to have the beta builds in the '~x86' arch?

I don't want to run two versions of KDE but i also don't want to have all the ebuilds showing up on my 'emerge -uDvp world' :cry:

Is there a good reason why they're not masked?

ps. i'm not complaining, just curious :wink:

_________________
www.iamthepenguin.com

Jakub · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 8:58 am Post subject:

Well I certainly have them masked

. Maybe you unmasked them? (in /etc/portage/package.unmask)?

EDIT: Hmm, now that's strange, I can see the line:

Raoul_Duke · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:04 am Post subject:

Jakub · Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:19 am Post subject:

There's something I don't understand and I would be glad if someone could explain this to me.

I've always thought a package is either in the x86 arch or in the unstable ~x86 arch (and will show up in emerge -u world if you have the appropriate ACCEPT_KEYWORDS option in your /etc/make.cong) OR it is hard-masked and then, well, it doesn't have the KEYWORDS part in the ebuild and it won't show in emerge -u world (in order to install it, you have to either point emerge to a specific ebuild file or unmask it in package.unmask).

So could someone who's more competent

clarify this for me? If the betas are not hard-masked, I would also be very interested why it's so (after all, they could potentially be very unstable, with some grave, not yet discovered bugs).