View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eNTi Veteran
Joined: 20 Oct 2002 Posts: 1011 Location: Salzburg, Austria
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2002 12:10 pm Post subject: linux 2.4.20 (vanilla kernel) + nvidia 1.0-3123 drivers |
|
|
this combination is not working. i get hard lockups when i try to enter X.
SysSpecs: AMD AthlonXP 2000+ (1666Mhz / 133[266]FSB)
Epox 8KHAL (VIA KT266A)
512MB Infineon RAM
Asus GeForce 4 Ti4600 128MB (V8460 Ultra)
IBM 80GB 7200rpm / Segate 40GB 5400rpm
Creative SBLive! [ALSA 0.9.0rc2]
Gentoo BSV 1.4.1.1
Kernel 2.4.20 vanilla
X 4.2.1 / Enlightenment 0.16 _________________ If you fall off a cliff, you might as well try to fly. After all, you got nothing to lose.
-- John Sheridan - Babylon 5, Season 4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oniq Guru
Joined: 02 Sep 2002 Posts: 597 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2002 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a specific reason you went to 2.4.20? Unless you have new hardware supported you should just go back to .19... I haven't upgraded, I'll wait until all the bugs are ironed out (like the ext3 corruption bug.. fun!). _________________ open like a child's mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2002 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I briefly ran 2.4.20 (I now run 2.5.50), with nvidia-kernel driver and didn't encounter any problems (same processor / asus motherboard / asus 7100 (200mx) / sblive value ), I run xfree from cvs, but still the same nvidia-kernel driver.
Hope you fix it,
Cya lX. _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eNTi Veteran
Joined: 20 Oct 2002 Posts: 1011 Location: Salzburg, Austria
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2002 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the only reason why i'll use another new kernel ist the hope, that it is faster than the older and maybe even more reliable. i'm an "update-junky", that's why i'm using gentoo and not e.g. debian. _________________ If you fall off a cliff, you might as well try to fly. After all, you got nothing to lose.
-- John Sheridan - Babylon 5, Season 4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2002 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eNTi wrote: | the only reason why i'll use another new kernel ist the hope, that it is faster than the older and maybe even more reliable. i'm an "update-junky", that's why i'm using gentoo and not e.g. debian. |
I don't hope it's faster and changes are it ain't as reliable as previous version yet, but it's the trill of adventure..... (it normally has beter support for newer hardware, and also sometimes performance benefits c.q. security updates)
If I don't run the newest kernels / packages, how else can I trash my system, well I've been running some cvs and development kernel, but overall my system runs all day, damn......... don't you hate linux,
Cya lX. _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oniq Guru
Joined: 02 Sep 2002 Posts: 597 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2002 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used to be an "update-junky" but now I'm an "uptime-junky", got 32 days on this laptop running Gentoo 1.2, kernel 2.4.19... I guess thats the real reason I haven't upgraded. Although I don't see any need to, no huge speed increases between 2.4.X releases, you may notice some if you jump from 2.4 to 2.5. I hope you figure out the problem you're having, good luck. _________________ open like a child's mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rommel Veteran
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 1145 Location: Williamsburg Virginia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2002 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
well i ran the 2.4.20 for a bit and didnt have any troubles with X , i am using the nvidia drivers too, using a gainward ti4600 and epox 8kha+ board |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eNTi Veteran
Joined: 20 Oct 2002 Posts: 1011 Location: Salzburg, Austria
|
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
at last i found out what went wrong and i'm a little amazed about the solution.
i've forgotten to compile:
General Setup: System V IPC
support into my kernel. i didn't know 'till now that this one is needed. is this stated anywhere? or is it even obvious and i'm just to n00b to know it right away?
i found out by scanning through both configs (2.4.19 and 2.4.20) and checked what's different. then i read about "It is generally considered to be a good thing, and some programs won't run unless you say Y here." in the help and enabled it. _________________ If you fall off a cliff, you might as well try to fly. After all, you got nothing to lose.
-- John Sheridan - Babylon 5, Season 4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|