View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DaMouse Apprentice
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 233
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sibov wrote: | my Power down is broken with nitro4 |
Note: he said i was better if you plugged it in
-DaMouse _________________ I am the dark lord DaMouse I eat souls and wear the dressing gown of evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GentooBox Veteran
Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 1168 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cagnulein wrote: | works fine but a bit slower than nitro3
Code: | 2.6.9-rc1-nitro1 Sat Sep 4 14:47:19 2004 49.349
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Mon Sep 6 13:01:52 2004 50.682
2.6.9-rc1-love1 Sun Sep 5 12:10:17 2004 50.93
2.6.9-rc1-nitro2 Sun Sep 5 16:55:52 2004 50.975
2.6.9-rc1-nitro1 Sat Sep 4 13:15:46 2004 51.344
2.6.9-rc1-nitro4 Fri Sep 10 21:12:18 2004 51.475
2.6.9-rc1-nitro1 Sat Sep 4 14:30:03 2004 51.507
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Tue Sep 7 20:55:08 2004 51.843
2.6.9-rc1-love2 Fri Sep 10 13:19:33 2004 51.941
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Mon Sep 6 12:52:07 2004 52.003
|
|
slower ?
do you mean the values to the right ?
if they are pi-marks or something like that, then the kernel is faster than nitro3. _________________ Encrypt, lock up everything and duct tape the rest |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SchAmane Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Sep 2004 Posts: 107
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have problems with HALD (HAL from DBUS from CVS) with nitro kernels.
Problemm is that hald do not response after some time, and
Code: | # ps axl|grep hald
5 0 12173 1 20 0 4864 3520 ide_do Ds ? 0:00 /usr/sbin/hald
|
It seems to be same incompatible things from hald to new kernel IDE calls. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cagnulein l33t
Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 861 Location: Modena, Italy
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
they are pi-marks then much slower result, much faster kernel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DaMouse Apprentice
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 233
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.9-rc1-nitro1 Sat Sep 4 14:47:19 2004 49.349
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Mon Sep 6 13:01:52 2004 50.682
2.6.9-rc1-love1 Sun Sep 5 12:10:17 2004 50.93
2.6.9-rc1-nitro2 Sun Sep 5 16:55:52 2004 50.975
2.6.9-rc1-nitro1 Sat Sep 4 13:15:46 2004 51.344
2.6.9-rc1-nitro4 Fri Sep 10 21:12:18 2004 51.475
2.6.9-rc1-nitro1 Sat Sep 4 14:30:03 2004 51.507
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Tue Sep 7 20:55:08 2004 51.843
2.6.9-rc1-love2 Fri Sep 10 13:19:33 2004 51.941
you tested nitro3 twice with a 0.161 difference (maths in my head, tell me if i'm incorrect), also could you write a howto on how to do this so i can do some scheduler benchmarkings.
ok you tested nitro3 3 times now i reread it:
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Mon Sep 6 13:01:52 2004 50.682
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Tue Sep 7 20:55:08 2004 51.843
2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Mon Sep 6 12:52:07 2004 52.003
Doesn't this show that nitro4 is about average of the nitro3 performance spectrum?
-DaMouse _________________ I am the dark lord DaMouse I eat souls and wear the dressing gown of evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fimbulvetr n00b
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Posts: 51 Location: South Dakota
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So far so good! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cagnulein l33t
Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 861 Location: Modena, Italy
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the 2 different nitro times is outing from 2 different situation on my system.
opera+xchat = 2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Tue Sep 7 20:55:08 2004 51.843
xchat = 2.6.9-rc1-nitro3 Mon Sep 6 13:01:52 2004 50.682
xchat = 2.6.9-rc1-nitro4 Fri Sep 10 21:12:18 2004 51.475
Quote: | also could you write a howto on how to do this so i can do some scheduler benchmarkings. |
this script is a function of a mine main script that i use to compile kernel and other stuff...the problem is that now is only avaiable in italian language only, and the code is not really clean |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DaMouse Apprentice
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 233
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What programs does it use to benchmark? Also, you didn't mention what the third one was.
-DaMouse
PS Opera sucks _________________ I am the dark lord DaMouse I eat souls and wear the dressing gown of evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sibov Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Feb 2004 Posts: 147 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanx DaMouse very helpfull.
Is there anybody who had same problems with acpi and smp?
And please without some jokes about my power cable.
I wrote this message with that pc so i think the power cable is plugged in, becaus it's a
midi tower not a notebook
If i try to shutdown my pc via kde or via console #halt
ATX power off doesn't work and i need to push my power butten to switch off.
Thanx for any advice _________________ Gentoo 2.6.17-gentoo-r5 with dmraid Raid0 Dualboot
AMD64 X2 3800+, 4x512MB DDR PC3200Pro Corsair Geforce EN6600GT silencer @ 256MB
4x250GB SATAII Samsung SP120, Asus A8N Premium, Plextor PX712SA DVDRW
Logitech Dinovo, SB Audigy4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cagnulein l33t
Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 861 Location: Modena, Italy
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaMouse wrote: | What programs does it use to benchmark? Also, you didn't mention what the third one was.
-DaMouse
|
the 3rd: opera + xchat + xmms
Quote: | PS Opera sucks |
no words
the best browser ever...what do you use? IE with wine?
Quote: | What programs does it use to benchmark? |
as i saied, "pi" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DaMouse Apprentice
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 233
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
any specific pi program? if its super_pi i'd say thats not reallly a fair benchmark as its probably not in the 2.6 headers
-DaMouse _________________ I am the dark lord DaMouse I eat souls and wear the dressing gown of evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seppe Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[offtopic]
Opera sux indeed, it renders stuff almost as bad as IE It doesn't even know what z-index is
Honestly, firefox is the best browser on earth, no doubt about it. Just test it, make a html page with some advanced CSS (like boxes with z-indexes) in it. Opera and IE will render things wrong while Firefox ALWAYS renders everything 100% like you coded it. Firefox is the browser that respects the webstandards the most.
Oh and take a look at www.mozdev.org ... there are A LOT plugins available for Firefox so don't say that Opera has more features or something
[/offtopic]
And power down works fine here btw. If you have problems with it, try to reverse acpi-dsdt-initrd-patch-v0.6-2.6.9.patch. I think that is one which causes your troubles, sibov. Did power down worked with nitro3? _________________ nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miseiler Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Mar 2003 Posts: 118
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent! Compiles and runs excellently well on my system.
Also, unlike some of the other kernel patchsets, I can successfully enable p4 HT without breaking my keyboard intermittently. Very nice.
Unrelated to the kernel, but I finally took the plunge and moved to a pure udev system. Had some hangups, but everything is going swimmingly.
One of the fastest nitros I've used yet...certainly faster than the 2.6.8.1 5 and 6 nitros, anyway (which is what I'd needed to use before, thanks to some strange compiler errors which have since vanished).
Good work. _________________ Cthulhu for president. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikore n00b
Joined: 23 May 2004 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just decided to try this kernel out and i'm haveing a simular probelm to nuzzy. When my computer boots it goes to get the ip address for eth0 (dhcp) and the computer just locks up there. I am useing an Intel PRO/1000 CT (built in too my mobo), it works fine under windows and my back up kernel (2.6.9 rc1 MM2). Any ideas why its not working under this kernel verstion? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
atom Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 25 Nov 2002 Posts: 122 Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
MighMoS wrote: | Coolness! Now gensplash doesn't show the ugly text console when booting for the first two seconds.
However, I do have a question. With this kernel (and some others in the past), when I switch VCs, the screen blacks it self for half a seconds, almost like its changing resolution. It didn't do this w/ the 2.6.8.1 kernels and it would go directly to them, but 2.6.9-pre* has that delay. Any idea on what's causing it? |
i've experienced this as well with 2.6.9-rc* kernels. i have not found a solution. anybody else have suggestions?
i'm using fbsplash and vesafb-tng. _________________ ubuntu. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42 Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 5142 Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
atom wrote: | MighMoS wrote: | Coolness! Now gensplash doesn't show the ugly text console when booting for the first two seconds.
However, I do have a question. With this kernel (and some others in the past), when I switch VCs, the screen blacks it self for half a seconds, almost like its changing resolution. It didn't do this w/ the 2.6.8.1 kernels and it would go directly to them, but 2.6.9-pre* has that delay. Any idea on what's causing it? |
i've experienced this as well with 2.6.9-rc* kernels. i have not found a solution. anybody else have suggestions?
i'm using fbsplash and vesafb-tng. | For me, it only does this with fesafb-tng, not the default vesa. Ymmv, however... _________________ ~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HydroSan l33t
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 Posts: 764 Location: The Kremlin (aka Canada)
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was having Power issues with my sound and video cards earlier today. So I switched back to iogl-sources, and it worked fine. Mainly, studdering audio, which I recognized as being a power issue. Sound cards were both emu10k1-based (SBLive! and Audigy2.) _________________ I was a Gangster for Capitalism, by Major General Smedley Butler.
Server status: Currently down, being replaced with fresh install - 20% completed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fro5tbite n00b
Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
yaayy.. it works i was having problem with the previous releases, but now im backk with nitro.. woohooo _________________ " Fast Lane Equals Fast Cars, Fast Corner Equals Fast Driver "
180whp Civic Hybrid JDM B16a N/A |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pleusicles n00b
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nikore wrote: | I just decided to try this kernel out and i'm haveing a simular probelm to nuzzy. When my computer boots it goes to get the ip address for eth0 (dhcp) and the computer just locks up there. I am useing an Intel PRO/1000 CT (built in too my mobo), it works fine under windows and my back up kernel (2.6.9 rc1 MM2). Any ideas why its not working under this kernel verstion? |
I've also had such problems: the booting process stopped while starting lo (or in other case, pci-hotplug). By setting RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP to "no" in /etc/conf.d/rc, however, I was finally able to boot the machine. Of course, it may have been pure luck... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cagnulein l33t
Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 861 Location: Modena, Italy
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
DaMouse wrote: | any specific pi program? if its super_pi i'd say thats not reallly a fair benchmark as its probably not in the 2.6 headers
-DaMouse |
super_pi for linux si pi (read the super_pi file )
why is so fair? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neonik Guru
Joined: 08 Oct 2003 Posts: 501
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've just read about the new voluntary pre-emption patch. Is it planned to be included in the next release or does anyone want to try porting it? I haven't checked it out yet, that's why I'm asking.
For reference: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3810 _________________ Best regards,
neonik
netshot-0.0.8 - script that takes screenshots, generates their thumbnails and uploads them all! (has not been updated). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DizL n00b
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 74 Location: Warsaw, Poland
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I can't compile my new nitro - 2.6.8 nitro 5 works fine
Code: |
CC net/ipv4/af_inet.o
CC net/ipv4/igmp.o
CC net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.o
CC net/ipv4/fib_frontend.o
CC net/ipv4/fib_semantics.o
CC net/ipv4/fib_hash.o
CC net/ipv4/proc.o
CC net/ipv4/syncookies.o
CC net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.o
CC net/ipv4/netfilter/arpt_mangle.o
CC net/ipv4/netfilter/arptable_filter.o
LD net/ipv4/netfilter/built-in.o
CC [M] net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.o
CC [M] net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.o
CC [M] net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_generic.o
CC [M] net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.o
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c: In function `tcp_error':
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c:804: error: `NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING' undeclared (first use in this function)
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c:804: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c:804: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[3]: *** [net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.o] B³±d 1
make[2]: *** [net/ipv4/netfilter] B³±d 2
make[1]: *** [net/ipv4] B³±d 2
make: *** [net] B³±d 2 |
Any ideas???
THNX!
DIZL _________________ BenQ R55E| Celeron M 1,6 | 1024 DDR | 60GB | |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seppe Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
neonik wrote: | I've just read about the new voluntary pre-emption patch. Is it planned to be included in the next release or does anyone want to try porting it? I haven't checked it out yet, that's why I'm asking.
For reference: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3810 |
I already tried several times to include this patch. But it changes a LOT of files, and it's hard to patch against it later on. But once I succeed in it, and it all compiled fine! But when I rebooted with that new kernel, I got several kernel panics
Voluntary preempt isn't (or wasn't?) mature enough yet. But I will still experiment with it. I will include it when it's more stable
I think CK's patches + voluntary preempt gives your system a huge performance boost. _________________ nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neonik Guru
Joined: 08 Oct 2003 Posts: 501
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
seppe wrote: | I think CK's patches + voluntary preempt gives your system a huge performance boost. |
Yeah, it's been my guess too. Hopefully it'll work sometime. _________________ Best regards,
neonik
netshot-0.0.8 - script that takes screenshots, generates their thumbnails and uploads them all! (has not been updated). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Raku Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004 Posts: 2374 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
does this kernel support write-barriers?
with
Code: |
#/dev/hda6 /home reiser4 noatime,barrier=flush 0 0
|
my /home won't mount _________________ raku
Powered by Archlinux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|