View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
parsim Guru
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 347 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just curious, how come thunderbird 0.8 hit stable so fast? I thought the idea was that new apps sat in ~x86 for a while first. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Slyde Guru
Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 314
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yay. Let me grab the .dmg for OSX |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TommyB n00b
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 30 Location: Nuremberg, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
parsim wrote: | Just curious, how come thunderbird 0.8 hit stable so fast? I thought the idea was that new apps sat in ~x86 for a while first. |
Yes, but Tb 0.8 (and Firefox 0.10 and Mozilla 1.7.3) fixes some security problems and was therefore pushed stable. See this bug. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
younker Apprentice
Joined: 18 Feb 2004 Posts: 280 Location: China
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:12 am Post subject: Segment fault |
|
|
younker@HuaKe /mnt $ firefox
No running windows found
/usr/bin/firefox: line 87: 8797 Segmentation fault $mozbin "$@"
after upgrade to 1.0PR, start firefox, it told me that segmentation fault.
but 0.9.3 was ok.
glibc 2.3.4 + gcc 3.4.1 + kernel 2.6.8-r4 + xorg 6.8
what's the problem? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
parsim Guru
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 347 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
TommyB wrote: | parsim wrote: | Just curious, how come thunderbird 0.8 hit stable so fast? I thought the idea was that new apps sat in ~x86 for a while first. |
Yes, but Tb 0.8 (and Firefox 0.10 and Mozilla 1.7.3) fixes some security problems and was therefore pushed stable. See this bug. |
Ah, I see. Still, it's pretty alarming that I'm running the stable arch and a routine upgrade breaks the most important app on my system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jarealist Apprentice
Joined: 07 Oct 2002 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just installed Firefox 1.0PR and noticed that it wouldn't install themes and I kept getting a warning that "Updates to Preferences" was not being saved.
Saved my bookmarks and deleted my ~.mozilla folder, then I reconfigured my Preferences and reinstalled my Extensions and Themes. Best move I made as the Extensions and Themes install much better then on the older .93 version. Feels more solid and responsive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twink Apprentice
Joined: 06 Dec 2002 Posts: 178 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
what are people opinions on the new find toolbar, took me by surprise, not really sure if i like it quite yet although i think it will quickly grow on me. The fact it searches as you type and turns red when something isn't found is kinda neat. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Plastic l33t
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 649
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Slightly OT, but does anyone know where I can get a high res firefox icon? The normal ones look so pixelated on my dock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Mountain Man l33t
Joined: 03 Sep 2003 Posts: 643
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently updating Thunderbird breaks all previous settings. I had to rename "~/.thunderbird" in order for it work right, and now I can't figure out how to import my previous mail messages or address book.
Edit: You have to import the old files "by hand". Kind of a pain. _________________ I suck at signatures.
Last edited by The Mountain Man on Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Slyde Guru
Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 314
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Plastic wrote: | Slightly OT, but does anyone know where I can get a high res firefox icon? The normal ones look so pixelated on my dock... |
What size are you looking for? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Plastic l33t
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 649
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Slyde wrote: | What size are you looking for? |
About the same size OS X uses, i think it's 128x128. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Slyde Guru
Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 314
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Plastic wrote: | Slyde wrote: | What size are you looking for? |
About the same size OS X uses, i think it's 128x128. |
Found you one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Plastic l33t
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 649
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. It looks great. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Insanity5902 Veteran
Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 1228 Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I saved my mails, emerged .8 and now I can't get to them.
Well i actually i emerge .8, saved my emails unemerge it, emerge it again.
But it still isn't ready my emails. This sucks! _________________ Join the adopt an unanswered post initiative today |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Toe Knee n00b
Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Posts: 48 Location: Dundee
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sabaisabai Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 83 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do believe that the Firefox and Thunderbird releases move to stable too quickly. The only problems I consistently have with the software installed through portage is with those two.
Does anybody know if there's a way to copy over the settings for junk mail filtering (after I 'trained' it)?
Last edited by sabaisabai on Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
perseguidor Apprentice
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 278 Location: West Kingdom of Buenos Aires
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
paranode l33t
Joined: 06 Mar 2003 Posts: 679 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Twink wrote: | what are people opinions on the new find toolbar, took me by surprise, not really sure if i like it quite yet although i think it will quickly grow on me. The fact it searches as you type and turns red when something isn't found is kinda neat. |
I noticed that it doesn't actually work. It will highlight words, but when you actually try to find something in a page, and hit find next or press enter or anything it will do nothing. Anyone else seeing this annoying behavior? _________________ Meh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jup n00b
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paranode wrote: | Twink wrote: | what are people opinions on the new find toolbar, took me by surprise, not really sure if i like it quite yet although i think it will quickly grow on me. The fact it searches as you type and turns red when something isn't found is kinda neat. |
I noticed that it doesn't actually work. It will highlight words, but when you actually try to find something in a page, and hit find next or press enter or anything it will do nothing. Anyone else seeing this annoying behavior? |
Yep, it does that for me too. I am thinking about going back to 0.9.3, because find in page is pretty vital. Unless somebody has the solution, I'll probably just re-emerge 0.9.3 and wait, until this version gets reasonably usable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paranode l33t
Joined: 06 Mar 2003 Posts: 679 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I'm going back to 0.9.3 until it's more stable. _________________ Meh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maiku Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 592 Location: Escaping from NY
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I'm going to stick with Thunderbird 0.7.3-r1 until a newer version can deal with older settings or I feel like resetting everything again one day. I just couldn't save anything and I wanted to try gentoo-portage.com's RSS feed as an account but it wouldn't let me create a new account. So I am downgrading.
La de daa. _________________ Michael |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deepu Sudhakar Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Aug 2003 Posts: 84
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paranode wrote: | Twink wrote: | what are people opinions on the new find toolbar, took me by surprise, not really sure if i like it quite yet although i think it will quickly grow on me. The fact it searches as you type and turns red when something isn't found is kinda neat. |
I noticed that it doesn't actually work. It will highlight words, but when you actually try to find something in a page, and hit find next or press enter or anything it will do nothing. Anyone else seeing this annoying behavior? |
Just noticed this too...It will highlight words but it won't actually "find" them. I'm using Gnome. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Optimus' Apprentice
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've emerged the newest FF, but I don't see any of the new features? And I can't enter new preferences, it just says "failed to set preferences" or something like that. The version screen however says version 1.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jup n00b
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Optimus' wrote: | I've emerged the newest FF, but I don't see any of the new features? And I can't enter new preferences, it just says "failed to set preferences" or something like that. The version screen however says version 1.0 |
Yep, that's another problem. As I think someone mentioned before, I exported my bookmarks and then just moved .mozilla/firefox (I was too smart to delete ie ) away, restarted and imported old bookmarks, which reset everything but at least now setting preferences and creating new bookmarks works. However, this didn't solved "find in page" problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scottfk n00b
Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 44 Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:27 pm Post subject: delete entire lines? |
|
|
Here's a quirk in the new Firefox... you can't use the old-standby CTL-U to delete an entire line.
This was great for clearing the address bar... you'd just put the insertion point anywhere in the URL and hit CTL-U to delete the whole thing. You didn't have to select the whole thing, thus replacing whatever you had in your X clipboard.
Now whenever I hit CTL-U Firefox displays the source of the page. _________________ Be seeing you.
scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|