Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
ATI drivers 8.10.19 released
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
atrader42
n00b
n00b


Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:30 am    Post subject: ATI drivers 8.10.19 released Reply with quote

Has anyone tried them? Unfortunately, I'm on a machine that I don't have the time to deal with driver issues on atm, but I'd really like to know how it does in terms of fixing peoples' complaints. I haven't seen an ebuild, but the driver is here
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marctraider
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 387

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder what changed now...
Damn i really want composite working
_________________
MOBO: Maximus II Gene
RAM: DDR2 OCZ 4GB
CPU: E6400 Conroe
GPU: HD2600XT
SATA: 3x 250GB.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lokheed
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wonder if its going to work with the 2.6.11 RCs now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
discomfitor
l33t
l33t


Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 927
Location: None

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Straight off the release notes:
Quote:
New Features

The ATI Proprietary Linux software driver version introduces support for the ATI FireGL™ V5000.

Issues Resolved

This section provides information on issues that have been resolved with the latest release of the ATI Proprietary Linux driver. This includes the following:

* Starting X on a DVI display no longer results in noisy or flickering output with some displays
* The Monitor autodetect no longer finds a phantom CRT display if none is connected either RADEON™ X800, X700, X300, or FireGL™ V5100, and V5000
* The ATI Proprietary Linux driver now works with Apple Cinema display flat panels in single link mode
* fglrxconfig now produces a proper xorg.conf X Server configuration file
* Running certain 3D applications no longer result in system hangs on x86_64 systems with RADEON™ 9100/8500 series or FireGL™ 8800 installed
* Kernel Module Driver compile support for Kernel 2.6.10
* XVideo support now available in dualhead configuration
* 3D geometry corruption no longer occurs with Celestia and other 3d apps
* A blank screen or X failing to load and returning to the console no longer occurs under X.Org 6.8 when using the config file generated by fglrxconfig
* 64 Bit systems with 4 or more GB of RAM no longer hang the system while loading the X Server

Known Issues

The following section provides a brief description of known issues associated with the latest version of ATI Proprietary Linux driver. These issues include:

* TV Display is Corrupt After Switching Resolutions. Further information on this issue can be found at: http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4756.html
* Attempting to resume from system suspension results in the system failing to respond. Further information on this issue can be found at: http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4746.html
* Enabling Quad Buffer Stereo results in 2D graphics corruption under XFree86. Further information on this issue can be found at: http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4747.html
* Running two X servers simultaneously results in the system failing to respond. Further information on this issue can be found at: http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4748.html
* A blank screen may appear momentarily when X starts to load. An error message (or similar) may also appear on the text console. Further information on this issue can be found at: http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4755.html

TV Display is Corrupt After Switching Resolutions

This information applies to the following system configurations:

* ATI Proprietary Linux Driver 3.7.1 and later
* TV Out enabled in fglrxconfig
* Big Desktop or Dual Head monitor layout is used

This issue does not occur in Clone Mode or when the TV is the only connected display.

Upon using the resolution keyboard shortcuts (ctrl-alt-+) or (ctrl-alt--) to switch resolution of the XFree86 Desktop, the display will be off center or completely corrupt.

The TV display is not usable in this state and it is not possible to get back to a stable resolution once this has happened. A restart is required.
3D Linux Applications Corrupt or Hang with Force Multi-Sample Visuals Enabled

This information applies to the following system configurations:

* ATI Proprietary Linux Driver 3.7.1 and later
* "force multi-sample visuals" option enabled in fglrxconfig

A 3D window might appear normally, but will corrupt the contents of any other window placed above it.

The 3D display may also appear corrupt. Lines, polygons, and highlights will be visible, but textures will not. The application is not usable in this state and may crash after a few seconds.

This issue does not occur on all systems or monitor configurations. Symptoms may vary between different applications.
X Fails to Load on Systems with Linux Kernel Version 2.6.x

This information applies to the following system configurations:

* Linux kernel version 2.6.x
* Any ATI Linux driver

A blank screen may appear momentarily when X starts to load. The following error message (or similar) may appear on the text console or in /var/log/XFree86.0.log:
(EE) fglrx(0): [agp] unable to acquire AGP, error ""xf86_ENODEV""xf86_ENODEV""

This is not a problem with the display driver.

Version 2.6 kernels require a second kernel module in addition to agpgart, which should be named similar to the manufacturer of your motherboard AGP chipset. This error message should occur if the other agp module is not loaded.

This issue can be worked around as follows:

1. First make sure that agpgart is loading properly.
2. To find out which AGP controller your motherboard uses, issue the following command: lspci | grep AGP
3. To find a list of AGP related kernel modules installed on your machine, issue the following command and look for a module (*.ko file) that suits your AGP Controller: ls /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/char/agp
4. Use the modprobe command (as root) to load the module. For example: On a motherboard using a VIA® AGP Controller, you would load the via-agp.ko using modprobe as follows (notice that the trailing .ko is omitted): modprobe via-agp

Check the modprobe manpage for more information on loading kernel modules.

5. To verify that the AGP module is already loaded, run lsmod as root. With the X server running and the connection established, the usage count of this module must be greater than zero.

If you cannot find a suitable agp module for your motherboard, then you may want to upgrade to the latest version of the Linux kernel, or check your motherboard manufacturer's website for more information.
3D Applications Produce Open of Shared Memory Object Failed Error Message

This information applies to the following system configurations:

* ATI Proprietary Linux Driver version 3.14.6 and later

The following may occur when trying to run certain 3D applications:

* 3D image appears corrupt or blank
* Missing textures
* System performance drops sharply

The following error message may also appear numerous times:

FGLTexMgr: open of shared memory object failed (Function not implemented) __FGLTexMgrCreateObject: __FGLTexMgrSHMmalloc failed! fglX11AllocateManagedSurface: __FGLTexMgrCreateObject failed!

The display driver requires POSIX Shared Memory to be enabled on the system in order to run these applications correctly. This feature should be enabled by default on most current Linux distributions, but may be disabled intentionally by some system administrators or not included in older distributions.

To enable POSIX Shared Memory on your system, perform the following as root:

1. Add the following line to /etc/fstab (if it isn't there already): tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
2. Mount shared memory as follows: mount /dev/shm
3. Issue the following command to check that it mounted properly: mount | grep "shm"

If the mount was successful, then the following output (or similar) should appear:
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)

At this point, POSIX Shared Memory is enabled. Your 3D applications should run properly and the error message above should no longer occur.

If the output from this command is blank, then the mount failed.

If /dev/shm fails to mount, then this feature may not be turned on in your Linux kernel. In this case we recommend upgrading to a more recent Linux kernel, or contacting your Linux Distribution vendor for more information on enabling POSIX Shared Memory.


For those of you wondering why I, a staunch ati-hater/nvidia-proponent am interested in this, stay tuned to nitro-sources.
_________________
There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lokheed
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like they fixed my old problem:

A blank screen or X failing to load and returning to the console no longer occurs under X.Org 6.8 when using the config file generated by fglrxconfig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darckness wrote:

For those of you wondering why I, a staunch ati-hater/nvidia-proponent am interested in this, stay tuned to nitro-sources.


Well put...
_________________
Retired gentoo user
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scratalacha
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 127

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eh, I ended up making my own ebuild from the ATI site and beating the portage update by about 30 min. It has actually fixed some random lockup issues I was having previous. Lets hope it continues. :D
Also, the new ebuild seems to not be using a few of the previous patches... can we take this as a good sign?
_________________
Anime ate my computer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arainach
l33t
l33t


Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 609

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They compile and install fine on 2.6.11-rc3, but I've got no DRM, so apparently I'll have to update my kernel config. I think that I'll upgrade to 2.6.11-rc4 while I'm at it. Either way, ought to be interesting. At least they're putting out releases. Now I just want xcompmgr and Windows speeds. All in due time, I suppose.
_________________
Gentoo: Stage3 w/ NPTL & udev, gcc 3.4.4 full rebuild
Kernel: 2.6.15-gentoo-r1 w/ 1G-Lowmem Patch
System: Athlon XP 2.2Ghz/1GB Corsair Value/160GB, 250GB WD IDE/128MB GeForce 6800/Sony 17" Trinitron G200 @ 1280x1024x75Hz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scratalacha
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 127

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hahah.. good luck with your nitro kernel. I bet thats TOF to configure. Either way, I just struggle to get mine to work most of the time. ATI has really turned me off to their merchandise through this entire ordeal.
_________________
Anime ate my computer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Luka21
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

seems ati has fixed more then they say in release notes - i can now play doom3 w/ ultra low quality and things really feel alot faster; huge FPS difference compared to 8.8.25.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Evil Dark Archon
Guru
Guru


Joined: 21 Dec 2002
Posts: 562
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn't compile on amd64 with 2.6.11-rc4, here's the error

Code:
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.o
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function `firegl_stub_putminor':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:509: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:511: warning: `inter_module_unregister' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:574)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function `firegl_stub_register':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:531: warning: `inter_module_register' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:573)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:562: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function `firegl_get_user_ptr':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:1078: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function `firegl_put_user_ptr':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:1110: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:1110: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:1110: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:1110: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2216:41: macro "pud_offset" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function `do_vm_shm_nopage':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2216: error: `pud_offset' undeclared (first use in this function)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2216: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2216: error: for each function it appears in.)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: In function `__ke_vm_phys_addr_str':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2597: error: structure has no member named `pud'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2585: warning: unused variable `pud_p'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c: At top level:
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c:2686: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
make[1]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.o] Error 1
make: *** [_module_/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4'

_________________
This post has been over explained for newb-informing purposes.

Registered Linux user 347334
Abit AV8-3rd eye, AMD Athlon64 3500+ 90nm, ATI Radeon x850 pro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
total_planlos
n00b
n00b


Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 71
Location: Austria/Klagenfurt

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

now with my ATI 9200 MOBIL:

6348 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1269.600 FPS
6950 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1390.000 FPS
7492 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1498.400 FPS
7489 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1497.800 FPS
Broken pipe

with ati-drivers 3.14.6 850.000FPS! with 8.8.25 1050.000FPS!
_________________
SONY VAIO FJ1S, 1,7GHz Pentium M, 512 DDRAM, Intel 915GM 128 shared mem Grafik, 80GB Toshiba Platte
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
forbjok
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 207
Location: Hordaland, Norge

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does this mean ATI are actually improving their drivers? Who'd have thought...
Maybe my laptop's M9 will actually be useable in the near future.8O

(Don't get me wrong though - that's also the only ATI chip I have that isn't from the early 90s - and likely, will be for a long time. I hope. :wink: )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Cosby
Guru
Guru


Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 430
Location: Aachen, Germany

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

forbjok wrote:
Does this mean ATI are actually improving their drivers?

Yes, and whohooo, I came on my AMD64 with M10 with the old drivers (8.8.25) on 1200fps with glxgears and with the new drivers (8.10.19) on 1900fps 8O


Last edited by Bill Cosby on Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hiroki
Guru
Guru


Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 327
Location: @home in germany

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

total_planlos wrote:
now with my ATI 9200 MOBIL:

6348 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1269.600 FPS
6950 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1390.000 FPS
7492 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1498.400 FPS
7489 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1497.800 FPS
Broken pipe

with ati-drivers 3.14.6 850.000FPS! with 8.8.25 1050.000FPS!


well. ati-drivers-3.14.6 is a bad base for comparison. i remember older versions of ati-drivers, which were noticeably faster. and with each new version in the 3.* branch the speed decreased :roll:
so maybe something earlier than ati-drivers-3.7 would be a good to compare with. let's say they are on a good way to improve the speed more and more.. and even to depass the speed of some older drivers...
but.. for me the speed is only the second point on my priority list. the important thing to me is, that they are accellerated and a lto faster than the radeon-driver from xorg. so that's what matters. as i don't play games.... i'd prefer to see xorg's composite working with ati-drivers :) so i could (finally) use it.. and without annoying slowness of my desktop.. even without composite enabled and using the radeon-driver my desktop is noticeably slower.. (e.g. window/desktop switching, scrolling long pages in mozilla). so with composite enabled it's even slower...
please gimme some ati-drivers-opengl-accellerated-composite :) go ati go :!:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lepaca Kliffoth
l33t
l33t


Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 737
Location: Florence, Italy

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They had promised a february release regardless of having released a version this january. I'm seeing a company that is showing much more interest in linux than it had only a few months ago and it can't be bad. I see long time ati users are very frustrated, I'd like to tell them: just look at the trend. We (=linux users) are getting more attention, I think we're really starting to carve our place into the info-world. Windows is info-roadkill, it will kill itself out in a few years.
_________________
It isn't enough to win - everyone else must lose, and you also have to rub it in their face (maybe chop off an arm too for good measure).
Animebox!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vagabond
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lepaca Kliffoth wrote:
They had promised a february release regardless of having released a version this january. I'm seeing a company that is showing much more interest in linux than it had only a few months ago and it can't be bad. I see long time ati users are very frustrated, I'd like to tell them: just look at the trend. We (=linux users) are getting more attention, I think we're really starting to carve our place into the info-world. Windows is info-roadkill, it will kill itself out in a few years.


ATI had their chance with me, as far as I'm concerned they blew it. If the open graphics project doesn't come to fruition my next card is gonna be Nvidia.

Vag
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flammie
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 633
Location: Dublin, Ireland

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darckness wrote:
Straight off the release notes:
Quote:

* XVideo support now available in dualhead configuration



Yay! Finally.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lepaca Kliffoth
l33t
l33t


Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 737
Location: Florence, Italy

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vagabond wrote:

ATI had their chance with me, as far as I'm concerned they blew it. If the open graphics project doesn't come to fruition my next card is gonna be Nvidia.

Vag


Yes, thanks, I see your point. Can we get back to what we were saying while you're off buying your new card?


I tried the new drivers and they are obviously better. Much better. UT2004 barely fails being smooth (everything on the highest setting). Can anyone confirm this? I'm testing the drivers on the latest gentoo-dev-sources in portage compiled with genkernel and using genkernel's own configuration, let's see if different kernels amount to different experiences. I'll try them with the latest 2.6.10 nitro please someone else post his/her experience too. Oh silly me I almost forgot - I've got a radeon 9800 pro 128MBytes
_________________
It isn't enough to win - everyone else must lose, and you also have to rub it in their face (maybe chop off an arm too for good measure).
Animebox!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wedge_
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 08 Aug 2002
Posts: 3614
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just in case anyone missed this, as it's right at the start of the release notes:
Quote:
This release provides improved driver stability and 2D acceleration performance.

I have noticed that 2D seems a bit snappier, which is rather nice.
_________________
Per Ardua Ad Astra
The Earth is the cradle of the mind, but we cannot live forever in a cradle - Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky
Gentoo Radeon FAQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GlooM
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 119
Location: $HOME

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major success here:

Radeon 9800 Pro

ati-drivers-8.8.25
glxgears -- ~3320fps

ati-drivers-8.10.19
glxgears -- ~4620fps

Lets hope ATI keeps up the good work :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruomad
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 17 Apr 2003
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

success for me, but I had to add some patches for 2.6.11-rc4.
otherwise it failed sort of silently with drm module not built

patches I found somewhere googling

Now it works fine and a bit better than wityh 8.8.25 (1600 fps vs 1200 fps) on my M10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pleun
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmm, not really working here. They installed fine, but from the moment i try glxgears, my laptop locks up. Any suggestions?

edit: DRI should be loaded & working btw.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pleun
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmm, everything's working now, just copied my old xorg.conf. Weird, thought I had setup everything right. Anyway, getting 1362 fps now with glxgears, while i had 952 with 8.8.25 :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gauss_Cleric
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 85

PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also tremendous performance improvements here:

fgl_gears in 8.8.25 ---------> ~650fps
fgl_gears in 8.10.10 --------> ~860fps

glxgears in 8.10.19 ---------> ~4490fps

my system:

gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.10-r6
athlon xp 2800+ / 512MB RAM

ati radeon 9800Pro
nf7-s nforce2 based motherboard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum