View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Snowlock n00b
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:31 pm Post subject: KDE 3.3.2 & memory usage |
|
|
According to the infoCenter my memory usage is as follows:
Out of 512 MB RAM
----------------------
75% is used for 'disk buffering'
Out of 768 MB of SWAP
---------------------------
WHAT IS THE DEAL??? absolutely nothing is running, no applications... only 5 services are in the 'running' state, and all eye-candy is turned off. I have no theme, no background, the widget style is set to win 9x for extra performance, but still my memory is being used FOR SOMETHING.
Any ideas? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mirrorball Apprentice
Joined: 25 Apr 2003 Posts: 235 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Linux kernel uses as much memory as possible as disk cache to speed up performance. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
reversi n00b
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 8:08 pm Post subject: Re: KDE 3.3.2 & memory usage |
|
|
Snowlock wrote: | According to the infoCenter my memory usage is as follows:
Out of 512 MB RAM
----------------------
75% is used for 'disk buffering'
Out of 768 MB of SWAP
---------------------------
WHAT IS THE DEAL??? absolutely nothing is running, no applications... only 5 services are in the 'running' state, and all eye-candy is turned off. I have no theme, no background, the widget style is set to win 9x for extra performance, but still my memory is being used FOR SOMETHING.
Any ideas? |
It doesn't let anything go to waste. It's also not KDE related but kernel related. There is enough memory when it's needed.
[edit]
I was a bit slow registering I guess. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snowlock n00b
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am new to Linux, so I'm glad you guys have cleared this up... so regardless of which X windows I use, the amount of free memory is primarily going to be the same, because if nothing is really working in the background, most of the memory will be allocated to buffering the disk and data so as to enhance writes / reads?
But doesn't this actually slow-down the initial start-up of an application? I mean if my system has 5% free memory and I load UT2004, obviously it will need more memory to run, so the system will have to suspend the load of UT2004, re-allocate memory, then continue the load... right?
just wondering |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Headrush Watchman
Joined: 06 Nov 2003 Posts: 5597 Location: Bizarro World
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Snowlock wrote: | I am new to Linux, so I'm glad you guys have cleared this up... so regardless of which X windows I use, the amount of free memory is primarily going to be the same, because if nothing is really working in the background, most of the memory will be allocated to buffering the disk and data so as to enhance writes / reads?
But doesn't this actually slow-down the initial start-up of an application? I mean if my system has 5% free memory and I load UT2004, obviously it will need more memory to run, so the system will have to suspend the load of UT2004, re-allocate memory, then continue the load... right?
just wondering |
Without getting technical on you, don't worry. You won't notice any startup delays.
(Just because memory is claimed by a process, doesn't mean it is being used, hence no swapping when releasing to a new process) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sanome n00b
Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Posts: 51 Location: N.W England
|
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For interest, just after boot-up and onto the desktop, I'm on roughly:
Fluxbox - 43 mb
XFce - 55 mb
KDE (kdebase) - 93 mb
(to name a few)
that's before I start Firefox etc, were it quickly jumps up - I can feel a thread coming on |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|