Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Quel gestionnaire de fenetre choisir ?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index French
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Quel est votre gestionnaire de fenetre favori ?
WindowMaker / AfterStep
12%
 12%  [ 32 ]
e17
2%
 2%  [ 7 ]
enlightenment 0.16.x
7%
 7%  [ 18 ]
Fluxbox / Openbox / Blackbox / Hackedbox / ...
42%
 42%  [ 105 ]
icewm
1%
 1%  [ 4 ]
metacity
10%
 10%  [ 25 ]
sawfish
3%
 3%  [ 9 ]
waiema
2%
 2%  [ 6 ]
kwin :)
8%
 8%  [ 21 ]
Autre (ion, xfce, pwm, fvwm, *twm, etc)...
8%
 8%  [ 22 ]
Total Votes : 249

Author Message
TGL
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 02 Jun 2002
Posts: 1978
Location: Rennes, France

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2003 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Je pense l'essayer dès que j'aurai rien de mieux à faire, parceque c'est vrai que ça a l'air sympa. Le système d'autoprops me plait bien entre autre.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
b_Q
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 163

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Habituellement kwin.
Whitebox c'est quoi ça?
google == 6420 résultats: merde, j'abandonne!
S.v.p un raccourci.
Merci.
_________________
Preudhomme's Law of Window Cleaning:
It's on the other side.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
px
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 497
Location: Metz, France

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

je suis pas tres fan des wm, mais a mon avis c'est ca: http://whitebox.sourceforge.net/sshots.html
_________________
Nous autres, mordus d'informatique, préférons par-dessus tout passer notre temps à bidouiller nos ordinateurs, plutôt que les utiliser pour faire quelque chose de productif. [Dave Barry]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dioxmat
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 04 May 2002
Posts: 709
Location: /home/mat

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

c zarb, jai du confondre... je sais que yen a encore un, apparamment donc c'est pas whitebox... mais c'est quoi alors ?
_________________
mat
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
px
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 497
Location: Metz, France

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

je pense que ce que c'est waimea, ca ressemble pas mal a blackbox, avec un peu de chance c'est un dérivé
http://www.waimea.org/
_________________
Nous autres, mordus d'informatique, préférons par-dessus tout passer notre temps à bidouiller nos ordinateurs, plutôt que les utiliser pour faire quelque chose de productif. [Dave Barry]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dioxmat
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 04 May 2002
Posts: 709
Location: /home/mat

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

waimea est effectivement un derive de *box, mais bon il est tellement different des autres que je lai mis a part. c'est pas a lui que je pensais...
_________________
mat
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
px
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 497
Location: Metz, France

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Si ca peut t'aider a trouver : )

WindowLab: Based on aewm this minimalistic window manager emulates some of the behaviour of the Amiga.
Openbox: Based on Blackbox, with various features including anti-alised fonts with Xft and Xinerama support for multiple monitors.
Hackedbox: A stripped down version of blackbox, with the toolbar and slit features removed.
Matchbox: A small window manager, requiring only XLib, designed for computers with little screen real estate, including PDAs and phones.
Pekwm: Another aewm++ based window manager. Features include tabbed windows (grouping windows together in a single frame), root menus, and Xinerama support.
Waimea: A fast and highly customizable virtual desktop window manager which uses the Blackbox image rendering engine.
Metacity: A lightweight window manager which uses GTK+ 2.0 and is designed to integrate seamlessly with the GNOME 2.0 platform. (The previous home now only contains old versions.)
Clementine: A small, fast window manager based on aewm but rewritten in C++.
Interface WM: A window manager written in objective-c (originally a rewrite of alloywm) and optimized for GNUstep applications.
ZWM: a SDL based Window Manager and Widget library intended to be used in cross platform applications.
HaZe: A window manager based on mlvm.
Fluxbox: A new window manager based on blackbox, with some added features.
PAWM: The Puto Amo Window Manager (PAWM) is designed to be simple, small and functional.
aewm++: A window manager with more modern features than aewm but with the same look and feel.
NovaWM: A very new window manager in an early stage of development.
Golem: A small window manager supporting themes, plugins, and multi-screen displays.
Oroborus: A simple window manager with GNOME support, themes, and full keyboard control.
Treewm: A window manager that lets you create desktops and windows within desktops.
GwML: A window-manager written in OCAML.
Heliwm: A compact window manager designed to minimize memory consumption.
5dwm: The Indigo Magic Desktop for Linux.
Mosquito: A small window manager by Erik Thyrén, not to be confused with the beginnings of a GNOME-compliant window manager also called Mosquito by Michael Rogers, which seems to have disappeared.
Maewm: Yet another hack of aewm.
QLWM: A small and efficient Qt 2.x based window manager.
Phluid: Yet another window manager (pre-alpha) based on aewm.
Alloywm: Another window manager based on aewm.
Amaterus: a window manager using the GTK+ toolkit, in an early stage of development.
Evilwm: A minimalist window manager derived from aewm, with some additions in the area of keyboard control.
Ratpoison: A simple lightweight window manager with no fancy graphics or window decorations.
Ion: A window manager in early development based on PWM, which divides the screen into frames.
Perlwm: A window manager written in Perl, using the X11::Protocol module.
Efsane II: Formally Efsane, the first Turkish window manager, it has now been rewritten as Efsane II.
3Dwm: A Three-Dimensional workspace manager from Chalmers Medialab in Sweden.
Swm: The Small Window Manager is designed for low memory / small screen environments such as laptops and PDAs.
Puppet: A window manager written in Java, which has no window decoration and is keyboard driven. It includes a Java library, called Escher, for making X11 calls.
YAWM: A window manager, in an early state of development, which aims to be portable, intuitive and fast. Previously at www.yawm.org, but now defunct.
w9wm: This is a quick hack which adds virtual screens to the 9wm window manager.
larswm: Another hack of 9wm that adds automatic tiling of windows.
PWM: This is a lightweight window manager, which can frame multiple client windows within a single frame.
PLWM: The Pointless Window Manager. It is a highly modularised window manager written in Python.
EPIwm: A window manager that is intended to be small, fast, configurable while maintaining a large feature set.
wmG: A small GTK-based window manager that is GNOME-compliant, partially Mwm compliant, and fully ICCCM compliant.
Sapphire: A small and fast window manager based on aewm, written in C++.
aewm: The ascetic/aesthetic WM, a minimal window manager based on 9wm.
B4step: An original window manager for Linux and Solaris, featuring GNOME compliance and fancy window titles.
flwm: The Fast Light Window Manager, based on wm2.
lwm: the Lightweight Window Manager, which has no icons, no button bars, no icon docks, no root menus, no nothing.
mlvwm: a virtual window manager designed to look like the Macintosh.
qvwm: a Win95 look-a-like.
mwm 2.0: the 2.0 version of mwm includes support for multiple workspaces.
GWM: the Generic Window Manager is an old Lisp-based extensible window manager.
9wm: by David Hogan (dhog@cs.su.oz.au), this is an X window manager which attempts to emulate the Plan 9 window manager 8-1/2 as far as possible within the constraints imposed by X.
OSWM is the window manager from Sun's version of OPENSTEP for their Solaris platform. OPENSTEP is based on a joint specification from NeXT and Sun.
awm: the Ardent Window Manager was for a while a hotbed for hackers and offered some features (dynamic menus) not found on more current window managers
rtl: Siemen's window manager tiles windows so that they don't overlap and resizes the window with the focus to its preferred size.
dxwm: Digital's dxwm is part of the DECwindows offering
hpwm: HP's window manager offers a 3D look; it is a precursor of mwm
tekwm: Tektronix's window manager offering
m_swm: the Sigma window manager is on the R4 tape
pswm: Sun's PostScript-based pswm is part of the OpenWindows release
swm: Solbourne's swm is based on the OI toolkit and offers multiple GUI support and also a panning virtual window; configuration information comes from the resources file.
tvtwm: Tom's Virtual Tab Window Manager is also based on the Tab Window Manager and provides a virtual desktop modelled on the virtual-root window of swm. It is available on ftp.x.org and mirroring archive servers. The current [March '95] version is available at ftp.x.org/contrib/window_managers/tvtwm.pl11.tar.gz.
mvwm: the vtwm-style virtual-desktop added to OSF's mwm. A beta version is floating around (most recently from suresh@unipalm.co.uk) but requires a source license to OSF/Motif 1.1.3 [March '92].
NCDwm: the window manager local to NCD terminals offers an mwm look
XDSwm: the window manager local to Visual Technology's terminals is simple but full-featured.
vuewm: HP's MWM-based window manager offers configurable workspaces. SAIC offers a version of this VUE environment.
4Dwm: SGI's enhanced MWM
piewm: this version of tvtwm offers pie menus
pmwm: IXI's Panorama version of MWM offers olvwm-like features.
uwm: the Universal Window Manager is very outdated, but is an excellent example of how to do simple window manager functions. The source code (47K) is available, and minor modifications have been made to ensure it compiles on UnixWare, Linux, and AIX. It should also compile on other platforms without too much trouble.
wm: a very primitive overlapping window manager, originally designed to help with the debugging of the X11 server, this window manager was phased out in X11R2 or R3.
xwm: Possibly the first... this dates back to 1985, before X11 itself. The version in the archive is from X10R4.
_________________
Nous autres, mordus d'informatique, préférons par-dessus tout passer notre temps à bidouiller nos ordinateurs, plutôt que les utiliser pour faire quelque chose de productif. [Dave Barry]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dioxmat
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 04 May 2002
Posts: 709
Location: /home/mat

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

px wrote:
Si ca peut t'aider a trouver : )


un peu ! :)

Quote:

Hackedbox: A stripped down version of blackbox, with the toolbar and slit features removed.


Tada ! je corrige le poll.
_________________
mat
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cpc
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 7
Location: California

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2003 11:23 pm    Post subject: Fluxbox le tueur Reply with quote

Effectivement, il est tres rapide, econome en ressources, configurable...
Bref...efficace. 8)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrpingouin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 2
Location: France

PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2003 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

En plus vous avez vu la roadmap de fluxbox ? ça va être une tuerie.
Bon ok la devel version est largement instable, mais qu'est ce que ça va donner...
Mais moi je ne serais pas contre une option permettant de "toggle" les tabs à l'intérieur ou à l'extérieur des titlebars, parfois c plus lisible.

"On s'en fout de ta vie" ? :)
_________________
CHEA Laurent
mrpingouin@altern.org
laurent@krystale.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arlequin
l33t
l33t


Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 707
Location: grep $USER /etc/passwd | cut -d':' -f6

PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2003 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A ce propos, dans l'install de Solaris 9, le wm est Twm... comme quoi c'est vraiment de la balle :P
_________________
J'vous dis ciao !
Au fait, ciao ça veut dire bye en anglais.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hook
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 1398
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia

PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2003 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mon favori est fluxbox

...mais tout de suite que je change mon foo ramstick, je emergera encore kde avec slicker et karamba -ca c'est eye-candy!!! :D
_________________
tea+free software+law=hook

(deep inside i'm still a tux's little helper)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrpingouin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 2
Location: France

PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

En tout cas, j'ai testé la cvs d'xfce 4, pas encore très mûr mais c'est une bonne tuerie. Joli, rapide et avec un vrai wm (xfwm).
Mais bon certaines bonnes habitudes de flux me manquent, le nextwindow 4...
_________________
CHEA Laurent
mrpingouin@altern.org
laurent@krystale.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
da[brice]
n00b
n00b


Joined: 28 Oct 2002
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2003 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

personnellement, le desktop idéal sera pour moi atteint avec un fluxbox gérant la transparence des menus et des barres de titres (pour l'instant seuls les menus sont prévus), et un dock à la osX (à ce propos, g un projet utilisant Ecore_evas qui se profile pour dés que g du temps libre, avis aux amateurs !)
_________________
Brice
F0r3V3r L0L
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yop
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Location: Liège, Belgique

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2003 1:09 am    Post subject: Frank's Virtual Window Manage Reply with quote

arlequin wrote:
Par contre, par curiosité, j'aimerai bien savoir si il y a des gens sur cette planète qui utilise FVWM... car pour moi, c'est vraiment pire que tout comme wm...


Je pensais la même chose que toi jusqu'à ce qu'un petit malin m'a montré un screenshot de son bureau... TRES customisé, FVWM peut devenir le plus facile des WM. Il y aurait les "tabs", je l'aurai adopté.
_________________
- Yop -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TGL
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 02 Jun 2002
Posts: 1978
Location: Rennes, France

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2003 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FVWM, moi j'ai pas encore essayé, mais j'ai lu la doc et ça a vraiment l'air d'être de la balle. Le seul autre que je mettrais au même niveau, c'est Sawfish biensûr, que j'utilise.

Evidemment y'en a d'autres qui sont plus pratiques et jolis "out of the box", mais c'est pas ça qui importe. Au contraire, ce qui compte, c'est que une fois configuré tout se comporte comme tu l'imaginais, que dis-je, comme tu le rêverais. Je ne veux pas plier mes habitudes aux possibilités (sympa certes mais limités) d'un Metacity parcequ'il vient par défaut avec Gnome et a des thèmes joli, ou d'un Fluxbox parceque c'est le truc à la mode du moment sur le forum et qu'il a UNE feature que d'autres non pas (biiip "troll detected!"). Moi je veux plutôt plier mon WM à ce qui me parait naturel, pratique et rapide à utiliser. Il doit être personnalisable vraiment dans la manière dont il s'utilise, chaque petite feature imaginable doit être implémentable au niveau utilisateur, et ça c'est l'apanage de ceux, trop rares, qui sont scriptables.

Et même au niveau screenshot, FVWM s'en tire pas si mal en fait, le thème par défaut mis à part ;)

Yop: pour les tabs avec FVWM, y'a ça:
http://users.tpg.com.au/users/scottie7/fvwmtabs.html
Ils sont moins jolis que ceux de flux', mais on s'en fout un peu, non ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yop
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Location: Liège, Belgique

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2003 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fluxbox ? Bof. Je préfère PWM. J'aime bien les WM minimalistes comme wm2.

Pour ce qui est des WM tres configurables... que penses-tu de SCWM ?
_________________
- Yop -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TGL
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 02 Jun 2002
Posts: 1978
Location: Rennes, France

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2003 3:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yop wrote:
Fluxbox ? Bof. Je préfère PWM.

Dans ce genre là, moi aussi.

Yop wrote:
Pour ce qui est des WM tres configurables... que penses-tu de SCWM ?

Je pense que Sawfish en est le fils spirituel, et qu'il est maintenant orphelin :) Mais c'est clair que SCWM a, en son temps, vraiment introduit de bonnes idées.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
da[brice]
n00b
n00b


Joined: 28 Oct 2002
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2003 7:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Ils sont moins jolis que ceux de flux', mais on s'en fout un peu, non ?


euh, là, il sont pas "moins jolis" il sont "horribles"
mais je suis tout à fait d'accord avec toi, le wm, c une question de gout et d'habitude, il est pour moi important de prendre un wm avec lequel on se sent bien avant tout, et qui propose des possibilités de config aigues, pour pouvoir y faire ce que l'on veut.
_________________
Brice
F0r3V3r L0L
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crevetor
n00b
n00b


Joined: 01 May 2003
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2003 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quoi weewm n'est pas cite??? :)
Hehe en fait c'est un projet naissant. Le principe c'est de pouvoir tout controler au clavier. C'est des potes a moi qui developpent ca et ca marche pas mal...
Pour en savoir plus c'est ici : http://www.weewm.org
Vala
a+[/url]
_________________
Crevetor : membre de papoo
Crevetor : a papoo member
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djf_jeff
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 17 Feb 2003
Posts: 174
Location: Quebec

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2003 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WindowMaker marche tres bien une fois bien configurer, faut juste se donner la peine de le faire.

Genre, prendre 1-2 heures pour tout mettre comme on aime et après, ton desktop marche comme tu veux et intuitivement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
youpi_486
n00b
n00b


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 1
Location: Neuvy-le-Roi

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2003 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

> Par contre, par curiosité, j'aimerai bien savoir si il y a des gens sur cette planète qui utilise FVWM... car pour moi, c'est vraiment pire que tout comme wm...

Qu'as-tu contre fvwm ? Avant, j'etais sous twm, et vraiment les bureaux virtuels ont commence a me manquer (nostalgie de la console), donc je suis passe a fvwm, leger comme tout, et meme s'il n'est pas installe sur le poste qu'on me file, je copie /usr/bin/fvwm et mon .fvwmrc et basta. Apres, traitez-moi de dinosaure si vous voulez...
_________________
"...Deep Hack Mode--that mysterious and frightening state of
consciousness where Mortal Users fear to tread."
(By Matt Welsh)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmsec
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Jun 2003
Posts: 39
Location: Rezé

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

djf_jeff wrote:
WindowMaker marche tres bien une fois bien configurer, faut juste se donner la peine de le faire.

Genre, prendre 1-2 heures pour tout mettre comme on aime et après, ton desktop marche comme tu veux et intuitivement.


tout a fait d'accord. Et en plus avec WMakerconf c'est "finger" 8)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TGL
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 02 Jun 2002
Posts: 1978
Location: Rennes, France

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

djf_jeff wrote:
WindowMaker marche tres bien une fois bien configurer, faut juste se donner la peine de le faire.


Bof, je deteste pas, il est cohérent, rapide, bien fini... mais ça reste un nième wm "strict", avec sa conception sur la façon de faire les choses. Bien sûr il se configure, mais ça consiste juste à choisir un certains nombre d'options dans des listes préétablies. Bref, rien à voir avec un wm scriptable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
charlax
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Apr 2003
Posts: 64
Location: Nantes

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KDE est très sympa avec superkaramba. Et il y a moyen de faire un de très light ...

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/d3in/capture2.png
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index French All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum