| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vipernicus
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 1462
Location: Your College IT Dept.
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Robin79 wrote: | | vipernicus wrote: | | Robin79 wrote: | I get this wehn trying to compile the alsadrivers in the kernel
| Code: |
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.12-nitro1/alsa-driver/acore/snd.ko needs unknown symbol class_simple_device_add
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.12-nitro1/alsa-driver/acore/snd.ko needs unknown symbol devfs_mk_dir
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.12-nitro1/alsa-driver/acore/snd.ko needs unknown symbol devfs_mk_cdev
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.12-nitro1/alsa-driver/acore/snd.ko needs unknown symbol class_simple_device_remove
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.12-nitro1/alsa-driver/acore/snd.ko needs unknown symbol devfs_remove
|
EDIT. Iam trying thath ddevfs that tiger posted earlier  lets see if it helps EDIT. |
Are you trying to use the portage version of alsa, or the alsa provided with the kernel? If you are using the one provided with the kernel, you might want to try reversing the git-alsa patch, it makes some changes to hd_intel.c |
and how do i reverse? i tried the kernel version when i got that msg but i cant emerge it from portage either  |
You can try this:
download
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12/2.6.12-mm1/broken-out/git-alsa-fix.patch
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12/2.6.12-mm1/broken-out/git-alsa.patch
cp *.patch /usr/src/linux
cd /usr/src/linux
su
patch -Rp1 < ./git-alsa-fix.patch
patch -Rp1 < ./git-alsa.patch
--------------------------------------
That should reverse those patches, if you get any errors at all, unemerge nitro and then reemerge it, and wait for Tiger's help.
_________________
Viper-Sources Maintainer || nesl247 Projects || vipernicus.org blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger683
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No!
The fix is to add the second argument being a "0" to create_workqueue in alsa source.
so create_workqueue(x) becomes create_workqueue(x, 0)
disadvantage: you have to manually modify, ./configure and compile the driver.
however portage version is not being additionally patched so it schould work.
The fault is in swsusp2, which adds argument FLAGS to create_workqueue.
reversing the git-patch does NOT work!
cheers
T
_________________
Retired gentoo user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
smartdreamer
n00b
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've said nvidia unstable driver was fine, but I must take it back... I'm having X freezes.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
What hardware?
_________________
Retired gentoo user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Merlin-TC
l33t
Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 603
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any news if someone got the ATI drm drivers to work?
Even 2D is awfully slow
Damn you ATI.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b3cks
Veteran
Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 1481
Location: Bremen (GER)
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Merlin-TC wrote: | Any news if someone got the ATI drm drivers to work?
Even 2D is awfully slow
Damn you ATI.... |
I posted some information the page before but nobody seems to be interessted in.
Maybe cause it's ATi...  Have you the same problem?
_________________
I am /root and if you see me laughing you better have a backup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Merlin-TC
l33t
Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 603
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I tried several 2.6.12 kernels and the module could be built but it didn't work.
I guess we just have to wait for ATI and hope or hope that someone creates a patch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b3cks
Veteran
Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 1481
Location: Bremen (GER)
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Merlin-TC wrote: | I tried several 2.6.12 kernels and the module could be built but it didn't work.
I guess we just have to wait for ATI and hope or hope that someone creates a patch. |
Right, that is what we have to do. Waitin'...
_________________
I am /root and if you see me laughing you better have a backup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lenz
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 1439
Location: Marburg [HE, D, EU]
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Installed it yesterday, works great till now! 
Keep your work up, guys! 
Edit: Thanks for reintroducing the cool nitro[tm] logo!
_________________
.:: Lenz' Signature 1.7b ::.
| Gentoo Linux since v1.4 (08-2003) [Screenshot]
| NetHack Highscore: 5.476.380 Pts., Val-Dwa-Fem-Law, ~ ascended to demigoddess-hood ~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
malachay
n00b
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 71
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zephyrus wrote: | | Tiger683 wrote: | | Quote: |
I get exactly the same errors with 2.6.12-mm1 therefore this is not a "nitro-only" kernel behaviour.
I checked lkml.org but it seems that no-one has this kind of problem.
I don't know...maybe it is something strictly linked to my system or maybe i'm doing something wrong with the kernel configuration
|
Thanks! Its important to know you also have this problem with mm-sources.
Thanks for your effort,
Do you by any chance use ext3 ?
|
My boot partition is an ext3.
| Tiger683 wrote: |
[EDIT]
What chipset do you have on your MoBo?
[/EDIT]
|
nForce 4 Sli
this is the output of lspci, if can help.
| Code: |
0000:00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 0050 (rev a3)
0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2)
0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2)
0000:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev a2)
0000:00:07.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2)
0000:00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0d.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration
0000:00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map
0000:00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller
0000:00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control
0000:01:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Audigy (rev 04)
0000:01:06.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Audigy MIDI/Game port (rev 04)
0000:01:06.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Creative Labs SB Audigy FireWire Port (rev 04)
0000:01:09.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 80)
0000:05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV40 [GeForce 6800 Ultra/GeForce 6800 GT] (rev a2)
|
| Tiger683 wrote: |
[EDIT2]
Zephyrus: I can not find any mm-related patch in nitro that could lead to such behaviour... if you could verify occurence of
the bug with the syme .config in vanilly kernel, then you should post a bug to lkml.org or even better first try changing your .config (probably
add something rather than remove)
[/EDIT] |
I tried a few kernel revisions, this is a summary of the results i've obtained so far:
CAN BOOT
2.6.12-rc4-nitro1
2.6.12-rc6-mm1
2.6.12 (portage vanilla sources)
2.6.12-git8
CAN'T BOOT (All with the same errors)
2.6.12-nitro1
Linux 2.6.12-mm1
Linux 2.6.12-mm2
By the way, I found another error: driver complain about not being able to "reserve io adress XXX". |
Hey, I got the same error with the same kernels you tried!
Here´s my lspci output:
| Code: | 0000:00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 0050 (rev a3)
0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2)
0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2)
0000:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2)
0000:00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev a2)
0000:00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2)
0000:00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0d.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration
0000:00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map
0000:00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller
0000:00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control
0000:01:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 (rev 10)
0000:01:07.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc RTL8139 Ethernet (rev 10)
0000:05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV43 [GeForce 6600 GT] (rev a2)
|
It´s a Nforc4 SLI Board (SLI not enabled), more exact: DFI LANPARTY UT ULTRA D
My dmesg output is full of these messages:
| Code: | | the device is unavailable due to resource conflicts |
I am not able to activate hd-dma (because of the resource conflicts)
I am not able to start X (because of the resource conflicts)
When I´m at home I´ll append a full dmesg output.
P.S.
Yeah...it´s really "broken pipe" *lol* 
One time ... while I compiled 2.6.12-mm1 source, I got an error related to some pcibios stuff. Maybe I am able to reproduce the error...
_________________
"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b3cks
Veteran
Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 1481
Location: Bremen (GER)
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lenz wrote: | | Thanks for reintroducing the cool nitro[tm] logo! |
I should register it as a trademark. 
_________________
I am /root and if you see me laughing you better have a backup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| malachay wrote: |
P.S.
Yeah...it´s really "broken pipe" *lol*
One time ... while I compiled 2.6.12-mm1 source, I got an error related to some pcibios stuff. Maybe I am able to reproduce the error... |
Nah, its __ONLY__ on exactly this hardware, so we will have to investigate...
But now im already too deep in nitro2 -land to do any bigger changes
cheers
T
_________________
Retired gentoo user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
malachay
n00b
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 71
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tiger683 wrote: | | malachay wrote: |
P.S.
Yeah...it´s really "broken pipe" *lol*
One time ... while I compiled 2.6.12-mm1 source, I got an error related to some pcibios stuff. Maybe I am able to reproduce the error... |
Nah, its __ONLY__ on exactly this hardware, so we will have to investigate...
But now im already too deep in nitro2 -land to do any bigger changes
cheers
T |
Yes, of course I meant, it´s "broken pipe" on _my_ hardware
Here´s the error I could reproduce (I think this could be a hint..):
Kernel was 2.6.12-mm1
| Code: |
CHK include/linux/version.h
make[1]: `arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/asm-x86_64/offset.h
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
CHK usr/initramfs_list
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/x86_64/pci/built-in.o(.init.text+0x18e3): In function `pcibios_init':
: undefined reference to `pci_assign_unassigned_resources'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
|
It´s only for information. I know I´ve no right for 64-bit support here.
I´ll post these info @lkml too.
_________________
"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jiangtao
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 80
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| b3cks wrote: |
1. ATi DRM
emerge ati-drivers
| Code: | * Building the DRM module...
make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.12-nitro1'
CC [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agp3.o
CC [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/nvidia-agp.o
CC [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.o
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c: In function `agp_find_supported_device':/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7150: error: structure has no member named `slot_name'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7170: error: structure has no member named `slot_name'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7175: error: structure has no member named `slot_name'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7201: error: structure has no member named `slot_name'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7221: error: structure has no member named `slot_name'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7241: error: structure has no member named `slot_name'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7246: error: structure has no member named `slot_name'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:6542: warning: unused variable `cap_ptr'
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c: In function `__fgl_agp_init':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7627: warning: `pm_register' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/pm.h:106)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c: In function `__fgl_agp_cleanup':
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:7637: warning: `pm_unregister_all' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/pm.h:116)
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c: At top level:
/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.c:6523: warning: `agp_check_supported_device' defined but not used
make[1]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/agpgart_be.o] Error 1
make: *** [_module_/var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.12.10/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.12-nitro1'
* DRM module not built
>>> Test phase [not enabled]: media-video/ati-drivers-8.12.10 |
That's the important output I think. It's the same output it get since the first *.12 RC. :-/ I have a ATi Radeon M 9700.
|
Me too ...
ATI X700 AGP |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Illissius
Guru
Joined: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 395
Location: Hungary
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's been running stably here for the past day or two. Not going to pass judgment on whether it's more responsive just yet (hard to notice the absence of something that happens only sporadically (lagginess) in such a short period of time), but it hasn't even hiccupped yet. Hopefully it won't when I start throwing heavier loads at it (gdb mainly, never fails to completely lag everything up for entire minutes) either, but I'm not holding my breath.
Also, I notice there's a relatively new nvidia framebuffer driver in there... I assume (1) that it's hardware accelerated, and (2) there's no way to get it to cooperate with the proprietary nvidia X drivers?
_________________
Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
last.fm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
radr
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 77
Location: MT
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:19 pm Post subject: built it up this morning.. but--- |
|
|
stress testing.. 4k stacks/ regparam/preempt... using CFQ scheduler ( a first for me )
nvidia drivers built fine, alsa + sblive is fine..
did notice slight hiccups when emerging packages (graphical only) a near second stall when switching windows. im not sure what could be causing this one, this is a relatively new occurance. last kernel i was using was 2.6.12-rc2-nitro1, never had a hiccup.
i wonder if it has something to do with CFQ scheduler, i used to use deadline. ( insight / ideas welcome)
but other than that hiccup issue under load, this kernel+patchset is DAMN SNAPPY. killer work!!
i might build up a second version of this kernel and try a different scheduler and see how that works out.. ( will post new results or edit this post).
::SYS SPECS (yes shes an old workhorse)::
AMD XP 1800+ @ 1900+
768M ram
GF FX 5200 128M + 2x 21" LCDs 
SB live 5.1
Intel pro 100+ nic
2.5TB disc space
~x86 Gentoo +NPTL, GCC 3.4.4
::END SYS SPECS::
anyone besides me have a slight stutter under load 
if i can knock the stutter out this will be the best kernel i have run to date!
_________________
Dual Opteron 280/1M (dual core = 4 procs) , 16G reg ECC ram, 4TB disc, NvIDIA GF 6800 PCI-E, SB X-FI
=Theres NO Substitute for Horsepower= |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zephyrus
Apprentice
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 204
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| malachay wrote: |
[snip]
Hey, I got the same error with the same kernels you tried!
Here´s my lspci output:
| Code: | 0000:00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 0050 (rev a3)
0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2)
0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2)
0000:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3)
0000:00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2)
0000:00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev a2)
0000:00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2)
0000:00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0d.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3)
0000:00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration
0000:00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map
0000:00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller
0000:00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control
0000:01:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 (rev 10)
0000:01:07.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc RTL8139 Ethernet (rev 10)
0000:05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV43 [GeForce 6600 GT] (rev a2)
|
It´s a Nforc4 SLI Board (SLI not enabled), more exact: DFI LANPARTY UT ULTRA D
My dmesg output is full of these messages:
| Code: | | the device is unavailable due to resource conflicts |
I am not able to activate hd-dma (because of the resource conflicts)
I am not able to start X (because of the resource conflicts)
When I´m at home I´ll append a full dmesg output.
P.S.
Yeah...it´s really "broken pipe" *lol*
One time ... while I compiled 2.6.12-mm1 source, I got an error related to some pcibios stuff. Maybe I am able to reproduce the error... |
Ohhh, at least i'm not the only one with these problems ... this is a "pleasant" surprise
I also have a DFI motherboard, LANPARTY nF4 SLI-DR . I'm not sure but if i rember well these two models share (basically) the same BIOS.
From what you wrote, i think that you are able to boot your system.
Do you have PATA or SATA hard drives? I bet PATA , because in your lspci output there is no sata controller...
| Quote: |
Kernel was 2.6.12-mm1
CHK include/linux/version.h
make[1]: `arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/asm-x86_64/offset.h
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
CHK usr/initramfs_list
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/x86_64/pci/built-in.o(.init.text+0x18e3): In function `pcibios_init':
: undefined reference to `pci_assign_unassigned_resources'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
|
This is already known , see http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/6/24/52
Last edited by Zephyrus on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The (probable) fix will be in nitro2
_________________
Retired gentoo user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Illissius
Guru
Joined: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 395
Location: Hungary
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just switched to my new a64+nf4, and was getting the same resource conflict errors mentioned previously. Switching to 2.6.12 vanilla fixed it.
_________________
Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
last.fm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
malachay
n00b
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 71
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zephyrus wrote: |
Ohhh, at least i'm not the only one with these problems ... this is a "pleasant" surprise
I have also a DFI motherboard, LANPARTY nF4 SLI-DR . I'm not sure but if i rember well this two model share (basically) the same BIOS.
From what you wrote, i think that you are able to boot your system.
Do you have PATA or SATA hard drives? I bet PATA , because in your lspci output there is no sata controller...
|
I love the LANPARTY boards, they´re great!
Yes, they share the same bios. I´ve tested the latest beta-bios (2005/06/23), the problem still exists.
Yes,you´re right, I use PATA.
OK, enabling PCI Hotplug fixes the compiling problem. But the real problem ,the resource conflicts,still exists.
Here´s my dmesg output: (2.6.12-mm2)
http://nopaste.php-q.net/144228
OK, tomorrow I´ll grep through lkml maybe there´s something usefull. Zephyrus, you haven´t found any yet? If there´s nothing to find I´ll post all the infos I have @lkml.
In meantime I use 2.6.12-gentoo-r2
_________________
"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mkrisch
n00b
Joined: 22 Nov 2004
Posts: 59
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:47 pm Post subject: Re: built it up this morning.. but--- |
|
|
| radr wrote: | stress testing.. 4k stacks/ regparam/preempt... using CFQ scheduler ( a first for me )
nvidia drivers built fine, alsa + sblive is fine..
did notice slight hiccups when emerging packages (graphical only) a near second stall when switching windows. im not sure what could be causing this one, this is a relatively new occurance. last kernel i was using was 2.6.12-rc2-nitro1, never had a hiccup.
i wonder if it has something to do with CFQ scheduler, i used to use deadline. ( insight / ideas welcome)
[deleted]
anyone besides me have a slight stutter under load
if i can knock the stutter out this will be the best kernel i have run to date! |
i've noticed the stutter as well, usually in conjunction with the gnome panel menu. i click on it, and nothing happens for 20-30 seconds or so. or in a console, i can't type anything. then after the hiccup, as you put it, everything's back to normal and fine.
i've set up my system similar to yours, 4k stacks, regparams and preempt. as for schedulers, i was running anticipatory. i've just switched to CFQ to see if it makes a difference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fleta
n00b
Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 68
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have problems compiling splashutils:
| Code: | >>> Install splashutils-0.9.1 into /var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/image/ category media-gfx
install -D fbres /var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/image//sbin/fbres
make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/work/miscsplashutils-0.1.2/fbtruetype'
install -D fbtruetype /var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/image//sbin/fbtruetype
install -D fbtruetype.static /var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/image//sbin/fbtruetype.static
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/work/miscsplashutils-0.1.2/fbtruetype'
make: Warning: File `linux' has modification time 3.5e+04 s in the future
make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/work/splashutils-0.9.1/libs/klibc-0.179/klibc'
make[1]: Warning: File `../linux/include/linux/limits.h' has modification time 3.4e+04 s in the future
make[1]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/splashutils-0.9.1/work/splashutils-0.9.1/libs/klibc-0.179/klibc'
MAKE klibc
make[1]: Warning: File `../linux/include/linux/limits.h' has modification time 3.4e+04 s in the future
make[1]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete.
CC splash.o
splash.c: In function `main':
splash.c:218: error: `FBIOSPLASH_SETMODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
splash.c:218: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
splash.c:218: error: for each function it appears in.)
splash.c:218: error: `FB_SPLASH_MODE_SILENT' undeclared (first use in this function)
splash.c:218: error: `FB_SPLASH_MODE_VERBOSE' undeclared (first use in this function)
splash.c:239: error: `FBIOSPLASH_GETMODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
make: *** [splash.o] Error 1
!!! ERROR: media-gfx/splashutils-0.9.1 failed.
!!! Function src_install, Line 89, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are using the wrong version.
| Code: |
echo ">=media-gfx/splashutils-0.9.1" >> /etc/portage/package.unmask
emerge =media-gfx/splashutils-1.1.9.6-r1
|
cheers
T
[EDIT]
New release soon.
but plz, dont cry for a 2.6.13-rc1 one, we dont want to ask for unnecessairy trouble,
2.6.12 stays as base unil ca. rc3 or rc4
[/EDIT]
_________________
Retired gentoo user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SchAmane
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tiger683 wrote: | but plz, dont cry for a 2.6.13-rc1 one, we dont want to ask for unnecessairy trouble,
2.6.12 stays as base unil ca. rc3 or rc4 |
We need stable 2.6.12-nitro4 first Next can be 2.6.13-rc4-nitro... 
We dont wont brake traditions ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683
Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so, you guys can begin to tidy up your /usr/src and /usr/portage/distfiles
_________________
Retired gentoo user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
