View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
royd n00b
Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2002 8:27 am Post subject: How about itanium? |
|
|
Any plans for supporting it?
r. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
larin n00b
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Posts: 2 Location: Oregon State University
|
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2003 12:56 am Post subject: Itanium Gentoo |
|
|
I have a zx2000 (single Itanium 2) at home, and would be happy to help in any porting
efforts. I am just starting out in the world of gentoo, and would need some help.
Currently the machine is running debian ia64. But it is not a production machine and there
are no problems making any desired changes.
-Larin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
davoid n00b
Joined: 29 Jun 2002 Posts: 26 Location: Montreal, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2003 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what do you think bout the itanium 2 since all your linux apps run in emulation mode. bummer eh :\ I mean only the kernel uses your processor like it should, the apps suck. _________________ At first they laugh at you, then they ignore you then they fight you and then you win. --Gandhi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
larin n00b
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Posts: 2 Location: Oregon State University
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2003 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, mysystem is a single 900MHz Itanium2. Running debian with the 2.4.19-mckinley-smp kernel It seems about the same speed as a 900MHz Pentium III. That is a purely subjective feeling though.
HP has a set of hand-coded ibraries for the Itanium2 to increase the math performance. The problem is that these libraries are only designed to work under RedHat Linux Advanced Workstation. In fact they currently only support WinXP 64-bit RC3, HP-UX, and RH AW on the zx2000.
I would have to agree that the performance of the zx200o has a great deal of room for improvement.
BTW: I am starting to try and bring up gentoo on the box, and had a question.
I am new to gentoo, so this may be a real simple problem. I downloaded and installed portage to the system. Now I am attempting to make emerge work. I set up a new /usr/lib/portage/profiles/default-ia64-1.4 directory based on the default-x86-1.4. I then make a symbolic link from the new directory to /etc/make.profile. When I attempt to do an emerge sync, my new directory gets deleted. How do I go about updating the system and keeping the new directory? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nempo Guru
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 360 Location: Linkoping, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2003 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
larin wrote: | Well, mysystem is a single 900MHz Itanium2. Running debian with the 2.4.19-mckinley-smp kernel It seems about the same speed as a 900MHz Pentium III. That is a purely subjective feeling though.
HP has a set of hand-coded ibraries for the Itanium2 to increase the math performance. The problem is that these libraries are only designed to work under RedHat Linux Advanced Workstation. In fact they currently only support WinXP 64-bit RC3, HP-UX, and RH AW on the zx2000.
I would have to agree that the performance of the zx200o has a great deal of room for improvement.
BTW: I am starting to try and bring up gentoo on the box, and had a question.
I am new to gentoo, so this may be a real simple problem. I downloaded and installed portage to the system. Now I am attempting to make emerge work. I set up a new /usr/lib/portage/profiles/default-ia64-1.4 directory based on the default-x86-1.4. I then make a symbolic link from the new directory to /etc/make.profile. When I attempt to do an emerge sync, my new directory gets deleted. How do I go about updating the system and keeping the new directory? |
In theory, you could place it anywhere and make a symlink to '/etc/make.profile' _________________
homeobocks wrote: | superjaded wrote: |
would Big Brother become a reality? |
Yeah . . . it would be just like the tv show. Except somebody would be watching. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gnufsh Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 2002 Posts: 400 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2003 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't gcc code 2-3 times slower than icc code on the Itanium? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|