View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
suka Developer
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 383
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wangxiaohu wrote: |
Yes, it does not open up a help window. |
Actually the ebuild warns at the beginning of the build-process about that |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simon_irl Guru
Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 403 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
suka wrote: | wangxiaohu wrote: |
Yes, it does not open up a help window. |
Actually the ebuild warns at the beginning of the build-process about that |
i missed that. did it warn that java would need to be enabled in order for help to display? is no help the only consequence of not enabling java?
i don't have -java in my USE flags, but i don't have java in there either. i guess if i enable java and set it compiling overnight again (that's why i missed the warning the first time) i'll have help...not a huge big deal, but it would be nice. are there any negative side-effects? if enabling java will slow down launch time or whatever, then i'll leave it without help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
phsdv Guru
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 372 Location: Europe
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VStrider wrote: | How's that for compile time?
Code: | $genlop -i openoffice
Total builds: 1
Global build time: 15 hours, 16 minutes and 30 seconds.
Info about currently installed ebuild:
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Fri Oct 21 20:07:19 2005
USE="curl eds gnome java python zlib xml2 -kde -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon-tbird -O2 -pipe"
|
I probably hold the record for the longest OOo2 compile. Beat that!
(Athlon thunderbird 1.1Ghz, 512Mb RAM) |
you asked for it, I beat you Code: | # genlop -ti openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Sun Oct 23 04:32:02 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 15 hours, 59 minutes and 39 seconds.
Total builds: 1
Global build time: 15 hours, 59 minutes and 39 seconds.
Info about currently installed ebuild:
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Sun Oct 23 04:32:02 2005
USE="curl eds gnome mozilla zlib xml2 -java -kde -ldap -nas"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3 -fforce-addr -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -pipe" | Porbably the -java saved me some compile time, otherwise I do not understand the small difference between my 733 MHz PIII and yours 1.1GHz athelon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sundiver2k n00b
Joined: 14 Feb 2003 Posts: 37 Location: Chattanooga, TN
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tried to emerge OO, and I got this error
Quote: |
/usr/share/aclocal/ao.m4:9: warning: underquoted definition of XIPH_PATH_AO
/usr/share/aclocal/ORBit.m4:4: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_ORBIT
configure:23538: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_CONFIG_MIN_VERSION
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
!!! ERROR: gnome-base/libgnome-2.12.0.1 failed.
!!! Function src_unpack, Line 46, Exitcode 1
!!! autoconf failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
I've looked around a bit, and I've yet to see anyone with this error. Any ideas??
**** Edit by Sundiver2k*****
I edited the ebuild and commented out the esound patch, and it appears to be rolling along again. Hopefully, I'll be running the new OO in a few hours. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VStrider Apprentice
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 244 Location: 1 to Rule All way, Moria Gate, Middle Earth, SAU 70N
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
phsdv wrote: | you asked for it, I beat you
merge time: 15 hours, 59 minutes and 39 seconds.
Porbably the -java saved me some compile time, otherwise I do not understand the small difference between my 733 MHz PIII and yours 1.1GHz athelon. |
Hahaha, nicely done!
Yeah, probably the -java flag saved you some time. You could be looking at an awesome 20 hours compile time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shead n00b
Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Yeah, probably the -java flag saved you some time. You could be looking at an awesome 20 hours compile time. |
You mean like this?
Code: |
shead@dandelo ~ $ genlop -ti openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Wed Jul 20 19:05:14 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.4-r1
merge time: 21 hours, 3 minutes and 27 seconds.
Fri Sep 23 02:07:58 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.5
merge time: 21 hours, 1 minute and 14 seconds.
Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 19 hours, 35 minutes and 15 seconds.
Total builds: 3
Global build time: 2 days, 13 hours, 39 minutes and 56 seconds.
Average merge time: 20 hours, 33 minutes and 18 seconds.
Info about currently installed ebuild:
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005
USE="curl eds python zlib xml2 -gnome -java -kde -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -ffast-math"
shead@dandelo ~ $ uname -a
Linux dandelo 2.6.13-gentoo #3 Mon Sep 26 18:45:11 MDT 2005 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2000+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
|
If I had +java I could have definitely hit 21 hours on 2.0. Strange that mine is 5 hours slower when I have a AMD 2000+ and 512 MB of RAM? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VStrider Apprentice
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 244 Location: 1 to Rule All way, Moria Gate, Middle Earth, SAU 70N
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shead wrote: |
You mean like this?
Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 19 hours, 35 minutes and 15 seconds.
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005
USE="curl eds python zlib xml2 -gnome -java -kde -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -ffast-math"
If I had +java I could have definitely hit 21 hours on 2.0. Strange that mine is 5 hours slower when I have a AMD 2000+ and 512 MB of RAM? |
Yeah, that's definitelly strange. Your machine should be alot faster. Maybe -ffast-math slows your system down?
Redhat Magazine - Performance Tuning with GCC, Part 1, Part 2 wrote: | In most cases, obtaining the very last nanosecond of performance is not terribly important. Optimization follows a distinct curve of diminishing returns. Most applications will thrive with the default transformations done at -O2, and since some of the more esoteric flags are seldom used, your code may behave erratically because of latent bugs in your application (for example, the code may be violating language aliasing rules). Though, sometimes the bug may be in the compiler itself. If the speedup is not measurable or insignificant, it may not be worth the pain.
An even bigger problem is the interactions between optimizing transformations. It is not uncommon for different optimizations to interfere or even cancel each other out, so by combining many different flags, you may be causing more harm than good.
One fundamental fact to always keep in mind when tuning for performance is that compiler optimization is not a silver bullet. Blindly adding different optimization flags hoping for some black magic to make your program faster is usually a recipe for frustration. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simon_irl Guru
Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 403 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok...recompiled (6 hours 20 minutes) with java and now the help works.
one thing that really annoys me is that the splash screen can no longer be disabled...or at least, on my system when i attempt to do so it replaces the splash screen with an enormous grey box. i can't find this issue in bugzilla...does it happen for anyone else?
to (attempt to) disable the splash screen, edit /usr/lib/openoffice/program/sofficerc so that Logo=0. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M.Pomme n00b
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
pinr wrote: | sandcrawler wrote: | Actually, the question might be... how long will it take for me to find out this doesn't work.... |
Or better still how long will it take to load after it is installed? In my case it takes whooping great 1min 20secs from when I click writer on the kde menu untill writer actually appears. That on an AMD 64 2800 with 512Mb of ram and a SATA hardisk. That time is unacceptable!
Edit: Just got that startup time down to 3 seconds by pointing to java in the options |
I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :
Code: | qjavaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! |
And when checking in the tools->options->java, no jre appears. I tried to add one by pointing directly to the jre directory, but it always makes a message box popup telling me that no jre was found in the directory.
Any idea ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kyro n00b
Joined: 20 Dec 2002 Posts: 56 Location: Over here
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
M.Pomme wrote: |
I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :
<snip>
Any idea ? |
Sure:
1. Open up /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/soffice with your favorite editor, find the following block:
Code: |
# extend the ld_library_path for java: javaldx checks the sofficerc for us
if [ -x "$sd_prog/javaldx" ] ; then
java_ld_library_path=`"$sd_prog/javaldx"`
if [ "$java_ld_library_path" != "" ] ; then
case $sd_platform in
AIX)
LIBPATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${LIBPATH}
;;
Darwin)
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH}
;;
HP-UX)
SHLIB_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${SHLIB_PATH}
;;
IRIX*)
LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH}
;;
*)
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
;;
esac
fi
fi
|
2. Comment it out and put in (this is for sun-jdk-bin-1.5.0.05 on my system (note that it points to jre/lib/, not just jre/)):
Code: | java_ld_library_path="/usr/local/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05/jre/lib/" |
3. Start OpenOffice, go to Options->Java, check the box so that your JRE actually gets used, then restart.
4. With some luck, that should be it.
Still can't wait for OO.org 2.0.2 to arrive though, so us x86_64-people can actually compile the thing ourselves. _________________ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alinv Guru
Joined: 19 Nov 2002 Posts: 395 Location: Bucharest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Two questions before I start compiling it:
1. Does anybody have a success story on OO compiled with gcc4?
2. How high can I set -j? (I'd like to use distcc for this, my machine is not that powerful)
Thanks,
Alin _________________ Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.
S.B. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M.Pomme n00b
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kyro wrote: | M.Pomme wrote: |
I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :
<snip>
Any idea ? |
Sure:
1. Open up /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/soffice with your favorite editor, find the following block:
Code: |
# extend the ld_library_path for java: javaldx checks the sofficerc for us
if [ -x "$sd_prog/javaldx" ] ; then
java_ld_library_path=`"$sd_prog/javaldx"`
if [ "$java_ld_library_path" != "" ] ; then
case $sd_platform in
<snip>
esac
fi
fi
|
2. Comment it out and put in (this is for sun-jdk-bin-1.5.0.05 on my system (note that it points to jre/lib/, not just jre/)):
Code: | java_ld_library_path="/usr/local/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05/jre/lib/" |
3. Start OpenOffice, go to Options->Java, check the box so that your JRE actually gets used, then restart.
4. With some luck, that should be it.
Still can't wait for OO.org 2.0.2 to arrive though, so us x86_64-people can actually compile the thing ourselves. |
Thanks, removing the call to javaldx saved me most of the start-up time which is now reasonnable. However, no jre is detected althought I tried to point java_ld_library_path to various valid directories, and to add JREs manually using the "add" button in the java option panel. Well, i don't really mind, since specifying a jre only allows features (namely embedded java applets) I don't have a use for yet, but it's weird. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
qupada n00b
Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M.Pomme wrote: | Kyro wrote: | M.Pomme wrote: |
I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :
<snip>
Any idea ? |
Sure:
1. Open up /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/soffice with your favorite editor, find the following block:
Code: |
# extend the ld_library_path for java: javaldx checks the sofficerc for us
if [ -x "$sd_prog/javaldx" ] ; then
java_ld_library_path=`"$sd_prog/javaldx"`
if [ "$java_ld_library_path" != "" ] ; then
case $sd_platform in
<snip>
esac
fi
fi
|
2. Comment it out and put in (this is for sun-jdk-bin-1.5.0.05 on my system (note that it points to jre/lib/, not just jre/)):
Code: | java_ld_library_path="/usr/local/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05/jre/lib/" |
3. Start OpenOffice, go to Options->Java, check the box so that your JRE actually gets used, then restart.
4. With some luck, that should be it.
Still can't wait for OO.org 2.0.2 to arrive though, so us x86_64-people can actually compile the thing ourselves. |
Thanks, removing the call to javaldx saved me most of the start-up time which is now reasonnable. However, no jre is detected althought I tried to point java_ld_library_path to various valid directories, and to add JREs manually using the "add" button in the java option panel. Well, i don't really mind, since specifying a jre only allows features (namely embedded java applets) I don't have a use for yet, but it's weird. |
I think for openoffice-bin you need a 32 bit jre.
I used the same one (sun jre v1.5.0_04) that i downloaded for the purpose of java applets in firefox-bin (per this tutorial: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Install_firefox_with_flash_and_java_on_amd64), OpenOffice found it fine with use of the add button in the preferences. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
effloresce Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, I've read the whole thread and I'm still confused on whether Oo2 will use the gtk icons (emerging from source with +gtk of course) or not.
I don't want to have to unmerge ximian-openoffice, and then after hours of emerging OO2 end up with some weird icons. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alinv Guru
Joined: 19 Nov 2002 Posts: 395 Location: Bucharest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
effloresce wrote: | I don't want to have to unmerge ximian-openoffice, and then after hours of emerging OO2 end up with some weird icons. |
You can package ximian-openoffice with quickpkg and if something goes wrong, you can emerge the binary, without compiling it again. _________________ Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.
S.B. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simon_irl Guru
Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 403 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
effloresce wrote: | Okay, I've read the whole thread and I'm still confused on whether Oo2 will use the gtk icons (emerging from source with +gtk of course) or not. |
yes...the build in portage (of openoffice 2) works just like openoffice-ximian with regard to user interface (or at least, it does on my gtk/gnome system...i can't speak for kde integration but assume that works too).
in fact, i think it's a bit better than before, although i'm not sure. but from memory, openoffice-ximian used gnomish icons and responded to colour changes in gtk theme settings...but the integration was fairly superficial...i don't remember the widgets changing significantly (shape etc.) whereas they do now. on the other hand, the dialogs are still clearly openoffice dialogs with gnomish icons (rather than proper gnome dialogs), and different icon sets aren't picked up by openoffice.
still, if your gtk theme is not too unusual, openoffice 2 will fit in nicely. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jedaih n00b
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
alinv wrote: |
1. Does anybody have a success story on OO compiled with gcc4?
|
Yes, i have installed OpenOffice.org 2, compiled with gcc 4.0.2
Code: |
app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 8 hours, 33 minutes and 51 seconds |
My system is
Code: |
Linux highwaystar 2.6.13-gentoo-r2 #1 Mon Oct 3 23:42:44 CLST 2005 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 2500+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
|
And Flags used in this compilation
Code: |
"-march=athlon-xp -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -pipe -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"
|
greetings from Chile |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeastOfBurden n00b
Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:00 pm Post subject: I think I win. |
|
|
On a Pentium II 300MHz with 278MB RAM:
% time emerge openoffice
<much, much later>
real 3688m29.632s
user 2873m39.232s
sys 411m32.363s
Yes, I run Gentoo as a desktop on a PII 300.
Yes, I installed from Stage 1.
Yes, I am a cheap masochist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xake Guru
Joined: 11 Feb 2004 Posts: 588 Location: Göteborg, the rainy part of scandinavia
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, sorry. While I have not yet tried to emerge openoffice (it seems like it is problem with it and modular xorg) i have this little fella...
Code: | # genlop -t openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Sun Oct 16 09:09:50 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0_rc2
merge time: 1 day, 21 hours, 37 minutes and 30 seconds. |
You guys just don't want to know what I did to this computer while emerging that thing... It is a P42.8 safely clocked to 3.0 using gcc-4.0.2 if you wanted to know.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2076
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Xake wrote: | Ok, sorry. While I have not yet tried to emerge openoffice (it seems like it is problem with it and modular xorg) i have this little fella...
Code: | # genlop -t openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Sun Oct 16 09:09:50 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0_rc2
merge time: 1 day, 21 hours, 37 minutes and 30 seconds. |
You guys just don't want to know what I did to this computer while emerging that thing... It is a P42.8 safely clocked to 3.0 using gcc-4.0.2 if you wanted to know.... |
Wtf, that should be way faster. Think like 4 hours |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NewbieTim n00b
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a.forlorn wrote: | How can I get rid off all these dependencies?
Code: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -vp openoffice
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] app-crypt/opencdk-0.5.7 -doc 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libtasn1-0.2.13 -doc 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/lzo-1.08-r1 0 kB
[ebuild N ] net-libs/gnutls-1.2.4 +crypt -doc +zlib 0 kB
[ebuild N ] net-libs/libsoup-2.2.6.1 -debug -doc +ssl -static 0 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-libs/glib-2.8.3 [2.6.5] -debug -doc -hardened 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/cairo-1.0.2 +X -doc -glitz +png 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/pango-1.10.1 -debug -doc 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/atk-1.10.3 -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-misc/shared-mime-info-0.16 0 kB
[ebuild NS ] x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.6 -debug -doc +jpeg +tiff 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/libglade-2.5.1 -debug -doc 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libIDL-0.8.6 -debug -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/orbit-2.12.4 -debug -doc +ssl -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/libbonobo-2.10.1 -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gconf-2.12.0 -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-mime-data-2.4.2 -debug 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.12.1.1 -debug -doc -gnutls -hal -howl +ipv6 -samba +ssl 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnome-2.12.0.1 -debug -doc -esd -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/nspr-4.4.1-r2 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/nss-3.9.2-r3 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2.12.0 +X -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/libbonoboui-2.10.1-r1 +X -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-keyring-0.4.5 -debug 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.12.0 -debug -doc +jpeg -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.4.1 -debug -doc +ipv6 -kerberos -krb4 -ldap -mozilla -nntp +ssl -static 0 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-util/pkgconfig-0.19 [0.17.2-r1] -hardened 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-themes/hicolor-icon-theme-0.8 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme-2.12.1 -debug 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-themes/gtk-engines-2.6.5 -accessibility -debug -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-themes/gnome-themes-2.12.1 -accessibility -debug 0 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/startup-notification-0.8 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-perl/Compress-Zlib-1.35 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-perl/Archive-Zip-1.16 0 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-java/ant-core-1.6.5-r2 -doc -source 0 kB
[ebuild N ] app-shells/tcsh-6.14-r1 +perl 0 kB
[ebuild N ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 +curl +eds +gnome +java +kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +python +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
Total size of downloads: 0 kB |
I have -gtk -gtk2 -gnome in my make.conf. |
Try
Code: | USE="-eds" emerge openoffice |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kilianh n00b
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Posts: 27 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Suka,
Thanks for the cool 2.0.0 ebuild . I have some library issues with it, but that's on a separate thread (https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-394580.html).
What I wanna raise here is the extras that ooo can be compiled with. You seem to expose them through USE flags, but my emerge log shows
Code: |
Building openoffice
tag: OOO_2_0_0
apply rules: /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/patches/OOO_2_0/apply
build dir: /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/OOO_2_0_0
tools dir: /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0
src package dir: /usr/portage/distfiles
distro: Gentoo
widget sets: gtk kde
icons: industrial crystal hicontrast
gcc to use: from system
hunspell-uno: no
hunspell-lib: no needed
openclipart: no
mono bindings: no
mdbtools/access: no
java: yes
ooo-install-dir: openoffice
force gcc33: no
ccache: no
icecream: no
cairo: no
build type: product build
download mirror: http://go-ooo.org/packages
|
with the following use flags:
Code: |
[ebuild N ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 +curl +eds +gnome +java +kde -ldap +mozilla -nas +python +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
|
Basically I see that there are other build options that seem to be disabled by default (config.log says --disable-access --disable-mono --disable-cairo) or by some other way. But especially openclipart, mdbtools and cairo sound like they would be cool things to have in OOo.
So, is there a reason these are disabled? Or haven't you gotten round to implementing these through use flags? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M.Pomme n00b
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, ok, thank you. I'll think about this if i ever feel the need for java support in openoffice. I'm not quite sure why it should require a 32 bit jre, as java bytecode is, well, java bytecode, but apparently it does. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
suka Developer
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 383
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kilianh wrote: |
Basically I see that there are other build options that seem to be disabled by default (config.log says --disable-access --disable-mono --disable-cairo) or by some other way. But especially openclipart, mdbtools and cairo sound like they would be cool things to have in OOo.
So, is there a reason these are disabled? Or haven't you gotten round to implementing these through use flags? |
Actually there is a reason for each of them Basically all three of them are not finished / experimental stuff, to add to that:
*) access-support breaks the build atm
*) Mono scripting stuff does not work out of the box
*) Cairo-stuff has a few nasty bugs and as it replaces the native drawing code, this is a no-go atm
But be sure that all of them will be coming sometime, but first we have to iron out all the basic stuff |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PrakashP Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Posts: 1249 Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Q-collective wrote: | Xake wrote: | Ok, sorry. While I have not yet tried to emerge openoffice (it seems like it is problem with it and modular xorg) i have this little fella...
Code: | # genlop -t openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Sun Oct 16 09:09:50 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0_rc2
merge time: 1 day, 21 hours, 37 minutes and 30 seconds. |
You guys just don't want to know what I did to this computer while emerging that thing... It is a P42.8 safely clocked to 3.0 using gcc-4.0.2 if you wanted to know.... |
Wtf, that should be way faster. Think like 4 hours |
I suspect the CPU got heated up too much, thus it was constantly throttled. Well, one should know how to oc... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|