| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
protex
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 88
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:50 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| kirillrdy wrote: | | rush_ad wrote: | just checked gentoo-portage
they have listed gnome-2.14 now. masked though. |
Should be masked  for a while at least. |
Wasn't someone saying it'd be unmasked by tomorrow? (end of the week?)
_________________
-Mitch
Desktop --> AMD Athlon XP 2600+@2GHZ, 1024mb DDR, BFG GeForce 6600GT OC, Gentoo (Emission guide)
Server --> AMD Duron 1300, 384mb, Gentoo Hardened
Laptop --> Intel Pentium II@399MHZ, 64mb, Gentoo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kirillrdy
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| protex wrote: | | kirillrdy wrote: | | rush_ad wrote: | just checked gentoo-portage
they have listed gnome-2.14 now. masked though. |
Should be masked for a while at least. |
Wasn't someone saying it'd be unmasked by tomorrow? (end of the week?) |
I dont know, Actually ofcourse all of us would like to see it unmasked sooninsh. We'll see
_________________
/-Everything is made from a dream-/ --Sakurai Kazutoshi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzobelmont
Guru
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Location: Chiapas, Mexico
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
unmasked & compiling
maybe tomorrow i post results.
_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano... Gentoo laetificat cor hominis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lex82
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yuhuuu!!!! 
Now, how can I unmask every package needed by GNOME 2.14?!? Should I do it manually (first unmask the meta-package, then the others one by one) or there's a faster method?
Thank you Gentoo guys! 
_________________
Bye,
Axel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
roog
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Aug 2004
Posts: 100
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lex82
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I'm going to wait a little bit more... maybe when it hits testing.
It's not difficult but the line "unmasking this packages may break your system" sounds bad to me! 
_________________
Bye,
Axel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kirillrdy
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lex82 wrote: | I guess I'm going to wait a little bit more... maybe when it hits testing.
It's not difficult but the line "unmasking this packages may break your system" sounds bad to me! |
I always keep a separate gentoo for breakage
But I'll try 2.14 tomorrow,
_________________
/-Everything is made from a dream-/ --Sakurai Kazutoshi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lex82
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kirillrdy wrote: | | But I'll try 2.14 tomorrow, |
Let me know if everything is ok...
_________________
Bye,
Axel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kirillrdy
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lex82 wrote: | | kirillrdy wrote: | | But I'll try 2.14 tomorrow, |
Let me know if everything is ok... |
Actually I already emerged gnome-terminal-2.14, couse I head its should be super fast.
And it works just fine, and actually, the speed perfomance in starting is visible, there is also some font rendering from which gnome terminal should benefit but for that i need to fully emerge gnome 2.14,
I'll keep u guys posted once i install it ( if I succed)
_________________
/-Everything is made from a dream-/ --Sakurai Kazutoshi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rikz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does somebody know, what about metacity compositor?
According to metacity-2.14.1.ebuild it is permanently off:
| Code: | pkg_setup() {
# Compositor is too unreliable
G2CONF="$(use_enable xinerama) --disable-compositor"
} |
But as far as I know, it could be easily disabled (and is disabled by default) via gconf. Maybe it is time to add a USE flag for compositor? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
olger901
l33t
Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 625
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How do you enable XGL, do you need xorg-7.0 for it? Do the ati-drivers work with XGL? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vdemeester
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 138
Location: France
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| olger901 wrote: | | How do you enable XGL, do you need xorg-7.0 for it? Do the ati-drivers work with XGL? |
every thing is here : http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_XGL and here : https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-442410.html
| Rikz wrote: | Does somebody know, what about metacity compositor?
According to metacity-2.14.1.ebuild it is permanently off:
| Code: | pkg_setup() {
# Compositor is too unreliable
G2CONF="$(use_enable xinerama) --disable-compositor"
} |
But as far as I know, it could be easily disabled (and is disabled by default) via gconf. Maybe it is time to add a USE flag for compositor? |
Someone have post a way to modify the ebuild to enable compistor with USE. But you can also modify the ebuild : raplce --disable-compositor by --enable-compositor. But you should have libXcomposite et libXdamage installed.
I try to enable-compositor but the compilation of metacity failed so.. (an i'm under xgl + compiz so..)
_________________
shortbrain.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
user317
Guru
Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 314
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Is gnome-terminal any faster? In gnome-2.12 when I run vim in gnome-terminal maximized, and I scroll in vim in such a way that the whole page is moving on every line (basically scroll down at the bottom or up at the top) X starts taking up 100% cpu. Konsole and Xterm do not have this issue with vim with the same font. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kirillrdy
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
You'll be surprised, but thats no longer an issue 
_________________
/-Everything is made from a dream-/ --Sakurai Kazutoshi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
darXider
n00b
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:03 am Post subject: nautilus compile fails |
|
|
I just emerged gnome 2.14 and everything compiles and runs except nautilus. I have gcc-3.4.5. Does anybody have the same problem as I have? This is the last few lines of the error message that I get:
| Code: | /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.5/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: .libs/nautilus: hidden symbol `__popcountsi2' in /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.5/libgcc.a(_popcountsi2.oS) is referenced by DSO
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.5/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [nautilus] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.14.0/work/nautilus-2.14.0/src'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.14.0/work/nautilus-2.14.0/src'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.14.0/work/nautilus-2.14.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.14.0/work/nautilus-2.14.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2
!!! ERROR: gnome-base/nautilus-2.14.0 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1565: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 974: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1280: Called gnome2_src_compile
!!! compile failure
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thasheep
n00b
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've emerged nautilus - and almost everything in the gnome metapackage (I left out a few things that I don't like and evince because I couldn't compile poppler).
That's all great but none of it is working. It might have something to do with my gcc - I'm using gcc-4.1 and maybe a couple too many cflags. Everything that's built on glib is exiting with a segfault 
[edit, that glib did say glibc....my gentoo isn't quite that broken]
Last edited by thasheep on Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:49 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lex82
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thasheep wrote: | I've emerged nautilus - and almost everything in the gnome metapackage (I left out a few things that I don't like and evince because I couldn't compile poppler).
That's all great but none of it is working. It might have something to do with my gcc - I'm using gcc-4.1 and maybe a couple too many cflags. Everything that's built on glibc is exiting with a segfault |
Well... maybe too much unstable packages?
_________________
Bye,
Axel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thasheep
n00b
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It'd be no fun if everything "just worked". But my other gentoo partition is also built with gcc-4.1 and gnome 2.12 works fine there. I'll see how I go rebuilding everything 2.14 again with the same cflags as I used for 2.12. I'll report back in several hours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lex82
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GNOME 2.12 has been in testing for 1.5 months! Maybe that version (and 2.14 too) needed some patched to work on gentoo...
_________________
Bye,
Axel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vdemeester
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 138
Location: France
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This version works . But i can't compile yelp 2.14.. But the rest is working here !
_________________
shortbrain.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Devport
Guru
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 361
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gmime 2.1.19 does not show mono use flag for me even though its in the ebuild ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
-ArTo-
n00b
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 14
Location: A Coruña (Spain)
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Devport wrote: | | gmime 2.1.19 does not show mono use flag for me even though its in the ebuild ? |
If you've amd64 add "-mono" to "/etc/portage/profile/use.mask" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Devport
Guru
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 361
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| -ArTo- wrote: | | Devport wrote: | | gmime 2.1.19 does not show mono use flag for me even though its in the ebuild ? |
If you've amd64 add "-mono" to "/etc/portage/profile/use.mask" |
Thanks, that did it. But why is it masked for this arch in this additional way ?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phaseburn
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 85
Location: Admin Land (Kernel Stack)
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vdemeester wrote: | | This version works . But i can't compile yelp 2.14.. But the rest is working here ! |
I had the same problem. I emerged mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.1-r3 and then re-emerged yelp, it worked. (AMD64 platform, but it may work for you if you're on another arch).
_________________
-PhaseBurn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
-ArTo-
n00b
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 14
Location: A Coruña (Spain)
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Devport wrote: | | -ArTo- wrote: | | Devport wrote: | | gmime 2.1.19 does not show mono use flag for me even though its in the ebuild ? |
If you've amd64 add "-mono" to "/etc/portage/profile/use.mask" |
Thanks, that did it. But why is it masked for this arch in this additional way ?! |
I have no idea why it is masked. I guess that there's some problem with mono in this arch but I didn't find it.
(Sorry for my english) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
