View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kasumi_Ninja Veteran
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 1825 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:16 pm Post subject: [SOLVED]NTFS write supported? |
|
|
In the kernel there is an option available to write to ntfs filesystem. Does this mean I can mount an rw an ntfs filesystem? Just like I do with fat32? Or are there problems to be expected? _________________ Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered
Last edited by Kasumi_Ninja on Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:18 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54799 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HXC,
Kernel ntfs write is safe but very limited. You can only change the contents of existing files without changing the file size.
There is a package called captive, which is a wrapper for the Windows ntfs filesystem software, so you get full windows functions but its been unmaintained for a while now. You can expect bit rot to set in.
Don't try either of them on a filesystem thats not expendable. _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kasumi_Ninja Veteran
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 1825 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the quick and clear answer! I have one question left; what would you advice me to use as filesystem? I have a large hardisk (250GB) divided into three partitions. I would like to use a fast filesystem ( I am using fat32 now) with the possibility to easily recover files. As far as I know none of linux filesystems (reiserfs, ext and xfs) offer the possibilty to easily recover files (in comparision to ntfs, fat32). As i have found out the hard way with my reiserfs parttion _________________ Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54799 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HXC,
No journalled filesystem makes it easy to recover files and Linux deliberately does not have an undelete function.
You would be able to undelete any users files and that would be a security issue.
It you want to recover files you deleted accidently, ext2 is better than ext3 but a 250Gb filesystem will take hours (days ?) to fsck after a power loss.
You should back up your important data _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arwing n00b
Joined: 21 Feb 2004 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HXC wrote: | Thanks for the quick and clear answer! I have one question left; what would you advice me to use as filesystem? | This depends on what you plan to put on these partitions.
What I gather, ext3 is a good general purpose Linux fs, reiserfs is the best for many very small files, and xfs is best for large files. Fat32 is best for reading and writing to files from both linux and windows, but if you don't have a need to read files from both Linux and Windows you should stay clear of it. NTFS is best for files you will only need to modify in windows.
For me, the fear of file corruption outweighs the need to undelete files, thus a journalled FS is best choice.
I have a 15GB reiserfs for gentoo, 15gb NTFS for windows, one really big XFS and one really big FAT32. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clintpatty Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 173 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="arwing"] HXC wrote: | What I gather, ext3 is a good general purpose Linux fs, reiserfs is the best for many very small files, and xfs is best for large files. |
I read this too. For me, XFS outperforms ext3 for large files. However, ext3 with full journaling, journal data mode, b tree hashing, etc optimizations beats Reiser3. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kasumi_Ninja Veteran
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 1825 Location: The Netherlands
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilo Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, there is a FUSE-module to enable more write support with NTFS.
See http://wiki.linux-ntfs.org/doku.php?id=ntfsmount _________________ "A stroll through a lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kasumi_Ninja Veteran
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 1825 Location: The Netherlands
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dballanc n00b
Joined: 24 Dec 2003 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if it would help you, but on my dual boot machine I've had a lot of luck using a shared ext3 partition for data. The driver for XP at www.fs-driver.org has worked well so far. It doesn't have permissions support, but it's good enough for my needs. . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kasumi_Ninja Veteran
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 1825 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dballanc wrote: | I don't know if it would help you, but on my dual boot machine I've had a lot of luck using a shared ext3 partition for data. The driver for XP at www.fs-driver.org has worked well so far. It doesn't have permissions support, but it's good enough for my needs. . |
I now use a heavily optimized ext3 partition. Thanks for the link it looks like agood driver for XP _________________ Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilo Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just for variety: EXT2IFS
Has worked pretty good for me, but I recall some trouble when I tried it with XP SP2. _________________ "A stroll through a lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rada Apprentice
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 202 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EXT2IFS works well for me as well but everytime I mount it in Windows then boot back into Gentoo a fsck is done which takes upwards of 10mins on my ~200GB partition. Is there any way around this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|