View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
batistuta Veteran
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 1384 Location: Aachen
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: why is projectM not in portage? |
|
|
I've been using projectM for a looong time already and I'm very happy with it, it's amazing.
I was wondering why it's not in portage. Is there a more stable or developed replacement? There is an ebuild in bugs.gentoo.org, but in portage is not even masked. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phenax l33t
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 972
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, Portage lacks many ebuilds for applications. You'll have to wait for a maintainer to pick up on the ebuild in portage, or read the Gentoo info pages on becoming a maintainer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
batistuta Veteran
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 1384 Location: Aachen
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is this the only reason? ProjectM is too cool for not being in portage. There is an ebuild maintainer, because there is a quite recent ebuild in bugs.gentoo.org. It's just that it is not in portage. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
genstef Retired Dev
Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 668 Location: M/Bay/Germany
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
An ebuild gets into portage when it is being committed to our CVS repository by a "developer". A developer has passed two quizzes and has had a very good mentoring. To get your ebuild into portage you have two choices a) get a current developer to commit the ebuild b) become a developer yourself in order to commit the ebuild.
For users there is also a way to commit ebuilds - but not for the official Gentoo Portage Tree. User committed ebuilds reside in the Gentoo Sunrise overlay. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since that is an xmms visualization plugin and xmms is being removed from portage, I doubt that it will ever be added to the tree. (Unless it is ported to other music players like Audacious) _________________
Bones McCracker wrote: | On the other hand, regex is popular with the ladies. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
batistuta Veteran
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 1384 Location: Aachen
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
genstef wrote: | An ebuild gets into portage when it is being committed to our CVS repository by a "developer" |
You are a developer. Wanna commit it?
Just kidding. Thanks for the clarification. I will see if I can trigger someone looking at that bug entry to commit the ebuild. I could just say "who cares, I have my ebuild". But I think the whole community could benefit from it.
yabbadabbadont wrote: | Since that is an xmms visualization plugin and xmms is being removed from portage, I doubt that it will ever be added to the tree. (Unless it is ported to other music players like Audacious) |
it works with Amarok via libvisual |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeliciousT n00b
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 12 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
projectM was supported by older versions of audacious via libvisual. Current versions have had libvisual support "temporarily removed for instability problems" according to faq at http://audacious-media-player.org/ Requests to nenolod the audacious developer for projectM have been put in here https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-510532.html along with a whole host of other plugins that should make people forget their xmms sadness. I Look forward to the next audacious-plugins release. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
batistuta Veteran
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 1384 Location: Aachen
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
If looks like someone (Stefan?) too the task shortly after my post and now it's ~x86. Here is the link, and thanks to whoever did it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark_alec Bodhisattva
Joined: 11 Sep 2004 Posts: 6066 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeliciousT n00b
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 12 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh happy day! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeliciousT n00b
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 12 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am pleased to inform you that the newest version of audacious-plugins now has projectM support. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sirdilznik l33t
Joined: 28 Apr 2005 Posts: 731
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
DeliciousT wrote: | I am pleased to inform you that the newest version of audacious-plugins now has projectM support. |
Oh hell fucking yes!!!!!! I just updated audacious and audacious-plugins. So sweet! I had projectM running with audacious previously which I compiled myself, but it was an older version (0,97). Now I have 0.99 and it is so amazing!
P.S. What makes projectM so amazing is that it does all these awesome effects at super high resolution and it doesn't use much CPU!!
Screenie
Screenie 2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Simius Apprentice
Joined: 26 Oct 2002 Posts: 219 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, those screenshots are totally different from what I got...
I have a really powerful nvidia card (Quadro FX4000) with the factory drivers, 3d accel works perfect (never had a blink of a slowdown in Blender, even with lots of vertices), yet all I get from projectM are RED (yes, that's about the sigle color, with some occasional green and yellow thrown in) scopes. Yep, scopes. Round scopes, parallel scopes, but no background, none of the cool kaleidoscope effects I loved in milkdrop, nothing.
Is this something wrong with the audacious plugin, or is it that only the pbuffers plugin works nice, or is there some configuration step I missed? (I tried both the original config and the "fastcomputers" one too.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheChuckster Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always felt that project-M was unstable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|