| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rmh3093
Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2003
Posts: 2138
Location: Albany, NY
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:34 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| buddabrod wrote: | | 2.6.21-rc4-viper1 makes the system lock for some time when i have heavy i/o load. (i know it has not been released yet, i just wanted to report) |
I havent had much luck with rc3 or rc4 yet... thats why -skunk is still on rc2... I hope the kernel devs get their act together by the time .21 is out
_________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rmh3093 wrote: | | buddabrod wrote: | | 2.6.21-rc4-viper1 makes the system lock for some time when i have heavy i/o load. (i know it has not been released yet, i just wanted to report) |
I havent had much luck with rc3 or rc4 yet... thats why -skunk is still on rc2... I hope the kernel devs get their act together by the time .21 is out |
Yes I can confirm that. System hardlocked too here! I have enough I'm back to a 2.6.19 kernel, which performs quite fast... 
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IvanMajhen
Guru
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 392
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Phlogiston.
Suspend2 works perfectly with this kernel. Something is wrong with your setup. Are you using genkernel? Because it want's to kill your init, baybe is something wrong with your initrd.
What is your lspci? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| IvanMajhen wrote: | Hey Phlogiston.
Suspend2 works perfectly with this kernel. Something is wrong with your setup. Are you using genkernel? Because it want's to kill your init, baybe is something wrong with your initrd.
What is your lspci? |
I don't think that it's my setup, because I used the same configuration with older kernels. Here is my lspci:
| Code: | 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/PM/GMS/910GML Express Processor to DRAM Controller (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/PM Express PCI Express Root Port (rev 03)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 03)
00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 03)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 03)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 03)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 03)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 03)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev d3)
00:1e.2 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 03)
00:1e.3 Modem: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 03)
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M) SATA Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 03)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc M22 [Radeon Mobility M300]
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751M Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 11)
04:00.0 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev 8d)
04:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (rev 01)
|
I'm now using beyond kernel which is much faster than this one, I don't know why, but maybe its because I don't use readahead.
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
newgargamel
n00b
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 9
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
So when viper5 will be out? Can't wait! 
btw thanks vipernicus for your great work! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vipernicus
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 1462
Location: Your College IT Dept.
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phlogiston wrote: | | I'm now using beyond kernel which is much faster than this one, I don't know why, but maybe its because I don't use readahead. |
It's because of RSDL. RSDL is fair and entitlement based, so you'll need to renice X to -15. This is what they recommend on the CK mailing list.
Kind of odd that one person can Suspend fine, and one can't. Maybe you should find out how Ivan has things set up?
_________________
Viper-Sources Maintainer || nesl247 Projects || vipernicus.org blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rmh3093
Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2003
Posts: 2138
Location: Albany, NY
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vipernicus wrote: | | Phlogiston wrote: | | I'm now using beyond kernel which is much faster than this one, I don't know why, but maybe its because I don't use readahead. |
It's because of RSDL. RSDL is fair and entitlement based, so you'll need to renice X to -15. This is what they recommend on the CK mailing list.
Kind of odd that one person can Suspend fine, and one can't. Maybe you should find out how Ivan has things set up? |
Thats they way it is with -skunk also, some people can suspend some cant.... I think there just have been so many changes in the kernel since 2.6.17 that everything is breaking now as they try to become compatible again (this has to do with all kernel related things not just suspend2)
_________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vipernicus wrote: | | Phlogiston wrote: | | I'm now using beyond kernel which is much faster than this one, I don't know why, but maybe its because I don't use readahead. |
It's because of RSDL. RSDL is fair and entitlement based, so you'll need to renice X to -15. This is what they recommend on the CK mailing list.
Kind of odd that one person can Suspend fine, and one can't. Maybe you should find out how Ivan has things set up? |
Hmm not sure... I was not using RSDL all the time... and I didn't mean response or CPU stuff, but HDD I/O.
I don't think so, I thought that you can get some information from the error. It's not my configuration I'm sure 
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
na641
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 171
Location: Eugene, OR
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| vipernicus wrote: | | Phlogiston wrote: | | I'm now using beyond kernel which is much faster than this one, I don't know why, but maybe its because I don't use readahead. |
It's because of RSDL. RSDL is fair and entitlement based, so you'll need to renice X to -15. This is what they recommend on the CK mailing list.
Kind of odd that one person can Suspend fine, and one can't. Maybe you should find out how Ivan has things set up? |
Runs fantastic here with RSDL (updated to current), no need to renice X. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IvanMajhen
Guru
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 392
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Phlogiston wrote: | | vipernicus wrote: | | Phlogiston wrote: | | I'm now using beyond kernel which is much faster than this one, I don't know why, but maybe its because I don't use readahead. |
It's because of RSDL. RSDL is fair and entitlement based, so you'll need to renice X to -15. This is what they recommend on the CK mailing list.
Kind of odd that one person can Suspend fine, and one can't. Maybe you should find out how Ivan has things set up? |
Hmm not sure... I was not using RSDL all the time... and I didn't mean response or CPU stuff, but HDD I/O.
I don't think so, I thought that you can get some information from the error. It's not my configuration I'm sure |
You should try to build minimal kernel configuration. Maybe is some driver buggy in 2.6.20. When i had toshiba, it didn't want to resume from Suspend2 or s2ram because of pnp_serial driver. Try without phc,usb,pcmcia,audio... Not even once i couldn't resume from suspend2, so i'm sticking with this kernel. Funny is that in-kernel suspend doesn't work for me. When it try to resume, nothing happens, only power led is blinking.
You have basicly the same system as I, the same drivers are used, except sata and graphics.
| Code: | 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 02)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02)
00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 02)
00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 02)
00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 4 (rev 02)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev e2)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GBM (ICH7-M) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 02)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller (rev 02)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 02)
06:01.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4401-B0 100Base-TX (rev 02)
06:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 02)
06:04.0 CardBus bridge: ENE Technology Inc CB-712/4 Cardbus Controller (rev 10)
06:04.1 FLASH memory: ENE Technology Inc ENE PCI Memory Stick Card Reader Controller (rev 01)
06:04.2 Generic system peripheral [0805]: ENE Technology Inc ENE PCI Secure Digital Card Reader Controller (rev 01)
06:04.3 FLASH memory: ENE Technology Inc FLASH memory: ENE Technology Inc: (rev 01)
06:04.4 FLASH memory: ENE Technology Inc Unknown device 0551 (rev 01)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm when I tried to resume today I had the same problem again. (With an updated beyond) I'm starting to believe that the problem is in the .20 kernel itself. Or do you think that a thinkpad patch could break it? Or could it have to do with a timer? Because the problem occurs only when there is some time (like overnight) between the hibernate and the resume...
Shall I go for mm vipernicus?
/edit: But how can I apply suspend2 patch on mm?
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phlogiston wrote: | Hmm when I tried to resume today I had the same problem again. (With an updated beyond) I'm starting to believe that the problem is in the .20 kernel itself. Or do you think that a thinkpad patch could break it? Or could it have to do with a timer? Because the problem occurs only when there is some time (like overnight) between the hibernate and the resume...
Shall I go for mm vipernicus?
/edit: But how can I apply suspend2 patch on mm? |
/edit2: Ok correted the Failed Hunks myself...
/edit3: But it does not compile at all like this, is there asuspend2 patch for mm?
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rmh3093
Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2003
Posts: 2138
Location: Albany, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phlogiston wrote: | Hmm when I tried to resume today I had the same problem again. (With an updated beyond) I'm starting to believe that the problem is in the .20 kernel itself. Or do you think that a thinkpad patch could break it? Or could it have to do with a timer? Because the problem occurs only when there is some time (like overnight) between the hibernate and the resume...
Shall I go for mm vipernicus?
/edit: But how can I apply suspend2 patch on mm? |
i have suspend2 for mm in my brokenout u can try
_________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rmh3093 wrote: |
i have suspend2 for mm in my brokenout u can try |
Hmm but not for 2.6.20... or at least I can't find it...
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vipernicus
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 1462
Location: Your College IT Dept.
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phlogiston wrote: | | rmh3093 wrote: |
i have suspend2 for mm in my brokenout u can try |
Hmm but not for 2.6.20... or at least I can't find it... |
latest -mm is 2.6.21-rc4-mm1
_________________
Viper-Sources Maintainer || nesl247 Projects || vipernicus.org blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_sys/sid
Guru
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 346
Location: Asola (Mantova)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vipernicus wrote: | | Phlogiston wrote: | | rmh3093 wrote: |
i have suspend2 for mm in my brokenout u can try |
Hmm but not for 2.6.20... or at least I can't find it... |
latest -mm is 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 |
I can't use .21...
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vipernicus
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 1462
Location: Your College IT Dept.
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phlogiston wrote: | | vipernicus wrote: | | Phlogiston wrote: | | rmh3093 wrote: |
i have suspend2 for mm in my brokenout u can try |
Hmm but not for 2.6.20... or at least I can't find it... |
latest -mm is 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 |
I can't use .21... |
Why?
_________________
Viper-Sources Maintainer || nesl247 Projects || vipernicus.org blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buddabrod
Apprentice
Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rmh3093
Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2003
Posts: 2138
Location: Albany, NY
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
>2.6.21-rc2 sucks, theres nothing worth upgrading to at the moment (except a minor bump in rsdl and suspend2 which are probably dont impact anyone in a positive way)
_________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buddabrod
Apprentice
Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rmh3093 wrote: |
>2.6.21-rc2 sucks, theres nothing worth upgrading to at the moment (except a minor bump in rsdl and suspend2 which are probably dont impact anyone in a positive way) |
Yeah that sucks :/
/me needs new ricer features *lol
With new viper i expected more or less a little bump, but it seems that it's not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vipernicus wrote: | | Phlogiston wrote: | | vipernicus wrote: |
latest -mm is 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 |
I can't use .21... |
Why? |
Linux phc does not work.
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vipernicus
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 1462
Location: Your College IT Dept.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vipernicus wrote: | Will be releasing -viper6 soon.
Features:
Latest RSDL (no splitsched)
ck-desktop-patches
all the usual goodies
Anything else? |
Yes, a working suspend2
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rmh3093
Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2003
Posts: 2138
Location: Albany, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phlogiston wrote: | | vipernicus wrote: | Will be releasing -viper6 soon.
Features:
Latest RSDL (no splitsched)
ck-desktop-patches
all the usual goodies
Anything else? |
Yes, a working suspend2 |
you should e-mail your problems with suspend2 to the suspend2 mailinglist.... its not vipers fault it doesn't work
_________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
