View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sae n00b
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 16 Location: Lund, Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:34 pm Post subject: qlogic 1040 |
|
|
Hello
What is the HD size limitation for the qla1040 controller? Can it handle newer drives, say 73GB?
(I could not find any comprehensible info on this controller neither on the net or qlogic official site...)
thanks _________________ "The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers." - Hamming
- AMD athlon 64x2 4600+, 3GB - |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Redhatter Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Sep 2003 Posts: 548 Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: Re: qlogic 1040 |
|
|
sae wrote: | Hello
What is the HD size limitation for the qla1040 controller? Can it handle newer drives, say 73GB?
(I could not find any comprehensible info on this controller neither on the net or qlogic official site...)
thanks |
SCSI typically isn't limited by the size of disk like IDE is. _________________ Stuart Longland (a.k.a Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere...
Gentoo/MIPS Cobalt developer, Mozilla herd member. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lupin_the_3rd Apprentice
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:09 pm Post subject: Re: qlogic 1040 |
|
|
Redhatter wrote: |
SCSI typically isn't limited by the size of disk like IDE is. |
I've never found a SCSI adapter that didn't handle newer drives. Even my old SGI Indy with 10MB/s scsi bus works just fine with the latest 300GB scsi drives. Yet another reason why SCSI is superior to IDE. _________________ Compaq XP1000 Alpha EV67 667Mhz w/ 2GB ECC
32bit PCI: ATI Radeon 9100 (DRI works!)
32bit PCI: Generic Firewire 400 card
64bit PCI: BCM5703 Gig-E (Compaq NC7771)
64bit PCI: Sil3124 SATA w/ mdadm RAID1 (pair of WD VelociRaptors) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kumba Developer
Joined: 16 Jul 2002 Posts: 393 Location: Sigma 957
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
IDE itself isn't limited to a certain drive size either, afaik. That's a limitation of the BIOS on most PC platforms that you're seeing. The BIOS code is pretty much a nasty, puke-stained mess of code that's been tediously maintained over the years by Phoenix, and every time someone makes a bigger IDE drive, they go and cook up a new hack that makes the BIOS code handle the bigger drives.
Dunno how SATA dodges this. Maybe Phoenix jacked the limits in BIOS up to the Exabyte level for once.
But anyways, SCSI FTW.
--Kumba _________________ "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."
--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|