View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
blofeld n00b
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 36 Location: Vienna
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kali wrote: | neenee wrote: | hm.. i am now running the 2.60-test1-mm2 kernel |
are u using reiserfs ?
i cannot mount root fs (reiserfs) with mm2 (mm1 work fine) |
Same here. Not able to mount / with reiserfs on mm2 _________________ This is my sick nature |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Exner Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Posts: 128 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EliasP wrote: | On bootup, I get the following error message:
Code: |
...
NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0
BIOS EDD facility v0.09 2003-Jan-22, 1 devices found
VFS: Cannot open root device "302" or hda2
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs or hda2
|
Filesystem support for ext3 is compiled into the kernel (not as modules), the IDE driver for my VIA chipset too.
In lilo.conf, the root = /dev/hda2 is there and passing it directly as parameter at the lilo-promt doesn`t help ;(
Any ideas ?
Greetings
Elias P. |
I also get an error opening root device [booting 2.6.0-test1-mm2], where a 2.5.74-mm3 kernel continues to work just fine. I don't have a solution yet. My motherboard chipset is nforce2. _________________ - Exner (Antony Suter) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vagabond Apprentice
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 192
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've got a Teac CD burner. I've burned CDs with it in older dev kernels but from ~2.5.75 onwards I've had this problem. I'm working on getting ATAPI CD-burning working on the 2.6 kernel and it seems to be burning sucessfully. Strangely I saw a reply to my email on the lkml stating that SCSI support is broken in the 2.6 kernel, but I've seen several people claim they've burned CDs on a 2.6 kernel so maybe its just broken with my hardware...
http://www.lkml.org/archive/2003/7/20/82/index.html
Vag |
|
Back to top |
|
|
handsomepete Guru
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 Posts: 548 Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Or maybe I just didn't reboot after I built 2.6-test... it's been a hectic couple weeks. *shrug* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Squinky86 Retired Dev
Joined: 25 Mar 2003 Posts: 309 Location: Alabama, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 5:51 pm Post subject: my overview |
|
|
This is a test kernel and feedback is wanted, so here are my overviews:
good:
1) Built in alsa drivers work great for me (itel8x0)
2) nvidia glx and kernel compilied fine and seem to be working prettifully
3) everything just seems faster and better and more efficient
bad:
1) no system bell; you know that little "beep" when you use tab-completion or try to backspace in xterm/konsole when you can't backspace anymore
2) winex3.1 doesn't seem to have cd-protection scanning working (already posted this in the gaming forum https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=68618)
ugly:
1) kde bug- my trashcan icon on my desktop says there's stuff in it, but there's not .
Basically, hats off to all the developers; I'm learning fast and hope someday to be one of you and give back to such great software! My system's been up for nearly 24 hours and there's no problems yet . I'm in awe! _________________ Me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yardbird l33t
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 Posts: 689 Location: nl.leiden
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: my overview |
|
|
Squinky86 wrote: |
1) no system bell; you know that little "beep" when you use tab-completion or try to backspace in xterm/konsole when you can't backspace anymore
|
If you refer to the PC-Speaker bell, now you have to enable it in kernel configuration. It is in the "Input Device" section. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jevin Sweval n00b
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Posts: 64 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i have the problem where when the kernel loads i get a blank screen. i cant attempt to try the fixes at codemonkey.org.uk because its down any ideas?
and do the ati-drivers work with 2.6.0-test1? i heard some no's but it might have been fixed.
i just want to get 2.6, ati-drivers, alsa, and some good framebufferness working before the day ends _________________ Help me! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Squinky86 Retired Dev
Joined: 25 Mar 2003 Posts: 309 Location: Alabama, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:34 pm Post subject: Re: my overview |
|
|
yardbird wrote: | If you refer to the PC-Speaker bell, now you have to enable it in kernel configuration. It is in the "Input Device" section. |
Ah, thank you! I didn't notice that before; the kernel is compiling (again). Now to get winex working again; I'm dying for some max payne ... Again, the new kernel is very nice!
[edit]
Oh, and I haven't fiddled with the framebuffer yet either; my screen went blank with it on, so I just took it out of my grub.conf file. I'll toy around with it later and see what happens.
[edit2]
some new things I ran into:
apm doesn't seem to be working at all, alsa isn't saving the volumes after reboots, I got a floppy error that had debugging info to cut and paste, but I can't reproduce it now.
There seem to be just a few little bugs here-and-there, but the kernel seems useable. _________________ Me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blurpy Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Feb 2003 Posts: 111 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One thing that's very annoying is that if I have machine check exception enabled in the kernel (which it is by default), the pc will freeze after 30 seconds when compiling, giving me a cpu context corrupt error.
The 2.4 kernel works fine with machine check exception enabled. And I have no problems with it disabled in 2.5/2.6. But I guess I'll never be able to install a distro with a 2.6 kernel because machine check exception is over-sensitive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tturktime n00b
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 27 Location: Donostia (43°19'N; 1°59'W)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
neenee wrote: | it seems the 2.6 test kernel doesn not process /etc/X11/
XF86Config in the same manner the 2.4.21 kernel did; my wheel
of my mouse does not work, and the cursor moves as if using
a low refresh rate - i can not actually see it skip, but i can see
that it is quite a bit less smooth than before. |
I managed to get my PS2 wheel mouse working adding the USB "HID input layer support" along with "/dev/hiddev raw HID device support" and "USB HIDBP Mouse (simple Boot) support" as a module. Don't know if this make sense, but my wheel works now and the mouse starts moving in the begining of the Xfree load instead of the end of the KDE startup. The XF86Config is the same used in the 2.4.20 kernel.
I'm using mm1+07; will try the mm2 sources now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tturktime n00b
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 27 Location: Donostia (43°19'N; 1°59'W)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 8:49 pm Post subject: Re: my overview |
|
|
Squinky86 wrote: | Oh, and I haven't fiddled with the framebuffer yet either; my screen went blank with it on, so I just took it out of my grub.conf file. I'll toy around with it later and see what happens.
|
My framebuffer start working when I compiled the framebuffer support into kernel instead of a module with the vesa vga graphics support too. Get the blank screen when compiling as a module (didn't try to load it in /etc/modules.autoload) I'm only using it to have 1024x768 virtual terminals, any chance to have a background image on them with this kernel series?
Anyone else is having problems with the Riva framebuffer support in the mm1 kernel? I'm gonna see if it compiles in mm2. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bushwakko Guru
Joined: 25 Mar 2003 Posts: 495
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 9:42 pm Post subject: sweet |
|
|
the new kernel seems TOTALLY sweet, but I can't use it because of stupid the stupid isdn is broken. and it has been since early 2.5. nobody seems to fix it either.
kstat_per_cpu thingy.... :(
btw. thanks for getting my pc-speaker back on track :)
edit: I would loooooove to have bootsplash support too. _________________ Macbook Pro 15"
Core 2 Duo 2,33ghz
2gb Ram
ATI Mobility x1600 256mb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
butters Guru
Joined: 13 May 2002 Posts: 427 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Has anyone applied ck's O6-O7 patches on test1-mm2 yet? I can't get them to apply, but they applied fine to test1-mm1.
Still haven't been able to apply the softrr patch on top of O7 on mm1 either. _________________ If tugboats were bigger, they'd be the ones getting tugged. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tturktime n00b
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 27 Location: Donostia (43°19'N; 1°59'W)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
butters wrote: | Has anyone applied ck's O6-O7 patches on test1-mm2 yet? I can't get them to apply, but they applied fine to test1-mm1.
Still haven't been able to apply the softrr patch on top of O7 on mm1 either. |
Aren't they applied by default?
Starborn wrote: | Just to let you guys know, 2.6.0-test1-mm2 has been released. Its got the O7 patch applied, but it looks like theres a pretty nasty bug in ext3 - can't emerge anything because of oopses during heavy disk IO - i've had to go back to mm1 with O7. |
Anyone know how to fix the reiserFS root partition problem? I'm using the same .config as in my last mm1+O7 kernel. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
handsomepete Guru
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 Posts: 548 Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tturktime wrote: | Anyone know how to fix the reiserFS root partition problem? I'm using the same .config as in my last mm1+O7 kernel. |
Does this help? I just saw it, haven't tried messing with the idea yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jimlynch11 Guru
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 590 Location: massachusetts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wilburpan wrote: | jimlynch11 wrote: | thanks for the help...can you post the pertinent parts of your /etc/modules.d/alsa and modules.conf files so i can compare? |
Here you go!
...
Hope this gets you going! |
thanks alot, yeah it did! and i have sound yet again |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kali n00b
Joined: 30 Sep 2002 Posts: 39 Location: Rome, Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
butters wrote: | Has anyone applied ck's O6-O7 patches on test1-mm2 yet? I can't get them to apply, but they applied fine to test1-mm1.
Still haven't been able to apply the softrr patch on top of O7 on mm1 either. |
mm2 already have O1 to O7 patches |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kali n00b
Joined: 30 Sep 2002 Posts: 39 Location: Rome, Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mm2 root file system fix
the problem is not the fs
just try to pass different root options @ boot
root=0307 (instead of root=/dev/hda7 for me)
03 is /dev/hda
07 is partition number |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jevin Sweval n00b
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Posts: 64 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok I turned off the frame buffer and now I get a kernel panic attempted to kill init.
let me get details about it
EDIT: hmm i didnt check the link to /usr/src/linux-beta when i emerged 2.6.0-test1. i was still trying 2.5.75 let me try the new kernel _________________ Help me! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tturktime n00b
Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 27 Location: Donostia (43°19'N; 1°59'W)
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
kali wrote: | mm2 root file system fix
the problem is not the fs
just try to pass different root options @ boot
root=0307 (instead of root=/dev/hda7 for me)
03 is /dev/hda
07 is partition number |
The trick worked on my reiserFS root partition. Everything seems to be ok. BTW, the supermount patch worked in the mm1, but failed to patch in mm2 because there is a new line in the drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c; need to add two lines manually:
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/fcntl.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
+ #include <linux/version.h>
+ #include <linux/supermount_media.h>
#include <linux/times.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
The "#include <linux/times.h>" was not there in mm1 nor 2.6.0test1 (I guess it wasn't neither in the 2.5.75 kernel which the patch is originally for). After compiled, worked flawlessly.
P.S: n00b on forum posting, n00b on kernel patching, n00b on gentoo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lucida Apprentice
Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
just use auto mount instead of super mount
btw, ide-scsi burning works fine here(mm1+o7)
and, if I use mm2, which boot parameter should I use,
my / is at /dev/hdc1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ethzero n00b
Joined: 24 May 2003 Posts: 53 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
lucida wrote: |
and, if I use mm2, which boot parameter should I use,
my / is at /dev/hdc1 |
Use root=1601. Took me a while to figure that out. 22 is the device number of /dev/hdc, which is 16 hexadecimal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ValKov n00b
Joined: 17 May 2003 Posts: 71 Location: Russin Federation
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Squinky86 wrote
Quote: | This is a test kernel and feedback is wanted, so here are my overviews:
good:
2) nvidia glx and kernel compilied fine and seem to be working prettifully |
I still have problem with nvidia drivers... Can you explain how you installed it ?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
floam Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2002 Posts: 1067 Location: Vancouver, WA USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
ValKov: just make sure you're on ~x86 and emerge nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
col l33t
Joined: 08 May 2002 Posts: 820 Location: Melbourne - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
can anyone help me with this (it wont build)
Code: |
# make clean bzImage modules modules_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `arch/i386/Makefile'.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `Makefile'.
RM $(CLEAN_FILES)
xargs: environment is too large for exec
make[1]: *** [clean] Error 1
make: *** [clean] Error 2
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|