| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hanc
n00b
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Marianske Lazne, Czech Republic
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:22 pm Post subject: mips-sources-2.6.20.14 on IP30 |
 |
|
Kernel compilation crashed with unresolved references to prom_meminit() and prom_free_prom_memory() on my Octane machine. I found that the problem was not enabling CONFIG_ARC_MEMORY option so arch/mips/arc/memory.c didn't compile. I got around the issue by adding IP30 to the config ARC_MEMORY section of arch/mips/Kconfig.
I haven't yet tested my kernel properly. I can only report that it compiled and booted.
I'd like to know if the CONFIG_ARC_MEMORY on IP30 was omited intentionaly or if it is a bug.
_________________
hanc |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nop2001
n00b
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Location: nord.nürnberg.de
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I got around the issue by adding IP30 to the config ARC_MEMORY section of arch/mips/Kconfig |
THANKS! helped me, too.
about to install on an octane,
* netboot-2006.0 2.6.14.6-mipsgit-20051030-ip30r10k+
* gcc 4.1.1,
* mips-sources 2.6.20.18-20070902.ip30,
* kgcc64 4.1.1...
has anyone got some more information on this issue? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redhatter
Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Sep 2003
Posts: 548
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
hanc: That is indeed a bug... pester `Kumba on #gentoo-mips, or file a bug.
nop2001: What issue? You don't mention any.
_________________
Stuart Longland (a.k.a Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere...
Gentoo/MIPS Cobalt developer, Mozilla herd member. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nop2001
n00b
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Location: nord.nürnberg.de
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | nop2001: What issue? You don't mention any. |
oops, sorry - the one i quoted above. i obviously stumbled upon the same bug. seems like there are only a hand full of r10k "gentooctanes" out there 
ed:
filed bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192437, hope it's all correct, been a while since i used bugzilla... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Galahad
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 126
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mine is back to irix, linux without X isn't much fun on a visual workstation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ddc
Guru
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 522
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Galahad wrote: | | mine is back to irix, linux without X isn't much fun on a visual workstation. |
on octane2 equipped with GFX_ImpactSR (GFX~=the video board), X11 is pretty
if you have a sgi-machine not equipped with a supported GFX .... no problem !
you could use Xvnc to export X11 to an other machine (a notebook, for example)
personally i find Xvnc very interesting on an octane equipped with GFX_{V6,V8,V12}
the GFX_V* family is still not supported by X11, but with Xvnc i have X11 fun |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Galahad
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 126
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ddc wrote: | | Galahad wrote: | | mine is back to irix, linux without X isn't much fun on a visual workstation. |
on octane2 equipped with GFX_ImpactSR (GFX~=the video board), X11 is pretty
if you have a sgi-machine not equipped with a supported GFX .... no problem !
you could use Xvnc to export X11 to an other machine (a notebook, for example)
personally i find Xvnc very interesting on an octane equipped with GFX_{V6,V8,V12}
the GFX_V* family is still not supported by X11, but with Xvnc i have X11 fun |
My Octane came with a V6 and I outfitted it with an additional SE, so I have both.
However X over some sort of framebuffer is not exactly my idea of fun, and what's the use of a workstation you have to remote control by (glacially slow, btw) XVnc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redhatter
Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Sep 2003
Posts: 548
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
XDMCP isn't too bad usually. In fact, it can be faster than IMPACT, since the Octane isn't worried about the specifics behind drawing on the screen, and the X server is presumably running a driver with full acceleration.
_________________
Stuart Longland (a.k.a Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere...
Gentoo/MIPS Cobalt developer, Mozilla herd member. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
