View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tomas.pulai Apprentice
Joined: 13 Feb 2008 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 12:21 pm Post subject: openoffice 3 emerge failed |
|
|
Code: |
* Failed Running aclocal !
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/aclocal-4901.out
*
* ERROR: app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_unpack
* environment, line 5499: Called eautoreconf
* environment, line 1644: Called eaclocal
* environment, line 1494: Called autotools_run_tool 'src_unpack'
* environment, line 632: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* die "Failed Running $1 !";
* The die message:
* Failed Running aclocal !
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/environment'.
*
|
some solution for me? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alexbuell Guru
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 490 Location: "Hemp"shire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Openoffice 3.0 is building quite happily on two of my boxes right now. Did you upgrade to all the latest stable versions required for building OpenOffice? _________________ Cheers,
Alex.
Linux - the best text adventure game ever. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomas.pulai Apprentice
Joined: 13 Feb 2008 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i thin yes...i use only stable packages (keyword = x86)..so i think yes
alexbuell wrote: | Openoffice 3.0 is building quite happily on two of my boxes right now. Did you upgrade to all the latest stable versions required for building OpenOffice? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Offler n00b
Joined: 12 Jun 2004 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm getting the same problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pizzach Apprentice
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
For me to get Openoffice.org to compile, I had to set in make.conf. With "-j2" the compile failed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RemcoNL Apprentice
Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 178 Location: Leiden, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pizzach wrote: | For me to get Openoffice.org to compile, I had to set in make.conf. With "-j2" the compile failed. |
I have just compiled OpenOffice 3 with `MAKEOPTS="-j3"` (AMD 64 dualcore), and was happily surprised that OpenOffice now uses multithreaded compiling instead of just one thread! I remember OOo2 taking 8 hours, now it was finished withing 5
So the -j2 option shouldn't be the problem. _________________ Use Compact Flash cards as a silent IDE hard drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13047 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you post your emerge --info plz ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
transpetaflops Apprentice
Joined: 16 May 2005 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you have /tmp and var/tmp on tmpfs make sure to increase the number of inodes. The 512K default on my 2GB AMD64 was obviously not enough. Compilation stopped every time when /tmp was 3.5GB full. Recompiling with /tmp mounted on harddrive right now so I can't say how many inodes are necessary. Does anyone know of a way to tell how many temporary files compiling of openoffice creates at maximum? I'm at 333000+ atm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|