View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cheater1034 Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nvidia is old news, although we have more hackish fixes that also work if you were using the zen-overlay
"2.6.27-zen3 (plus ext4 patches) doesn't react to changes in /sys/kernel/zen/system_layout:" >> because the zen-tune stuff isn't capable of doing that yet? only the custom_system_layout stuff which is the same thing anyway just with the numbers
common.c is fixed _________________ IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jurek n00b
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fixed?
Quote: | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function ‘early_identify_cpu’:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:555: error: ‘boot_cpu_id’ undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:555: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:555: error: for each function it appears in.)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function ‘cpu_init’:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1142: error: ‘boot_cpu_id’ undeclared (first use in this function)
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.o] Błąd 1
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu] Błąd 2
make: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Błąd 2
make: *** Oczekiwanie na niezakończone zadania....
|
_________________ C2Q 9550@4.0 Ghz - Asus P5Q-E - GTX 260 216sp - 4 GB DDR2 OCZ Titanium 1150 - Samsung HD103SJ 1TB - Cooler Master 590 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gaelic Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 119 Location: Vienna, Austria, Europe, World, Solar System, Milky Way, Universe
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i have the same problem, even after the latest git pull.
plus other problems:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x44dc6): Section mismatch in reference from the function create_proc_profile() to the variabl
e .cpuinit.data:profile_cpu_callback_nb.17948
The function create_proc_profile() references
the variable __cpuinitdata profile_cpu_callback_nb.17948.
This is often because create_proc_profile lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of profile_cpu_callback_nb.17948 is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.cpuinit.text+0x60b): Section mismatch in reference from the function fpu_init() to the function .in
it.text:init_thread_xstate()
The function __cpuinit fpu_init() references
a function __init init_thread_xstate().
If init_thread_xstate is only used by fpu_init then
annotate init_thread_xstate with a matching annotation.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x1768): Section mismatch in reference from the variable async_work.32912 to the function .ini
t.text:do_async_initcalls()
The variable async_work.32912 references
the function __init do_async_initcalls()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console,
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
dnsdomainname: Unknown host
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
WARNING: init/built-in.o(.text+0x2b2): Section mismatch in reference from the function init_post() to the function .ini
t.text:prepare_namespace()
The function init_post() references
the function __init prepare_namespace().
This is often because init_post lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of prepare_namespace is wrong.
WARNING: init/built-in.o(.data+0x248): Section mismatch in reference from the variable async_work.32912 to the function
.init.text:do_async_initcalls()
The variable async_work.32912 references
the function __init do_async_initcalls()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console,
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_do_probe_ddc_edid':
(.text+0x83c76): undefined reference to `i2c_transfer'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tranquilcool Veteran
Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 1243
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CC fs/reiser4/page_cache.o
fs/reiser4/page_cache.c:565: error: unknown field ‘prepare_write’ specified in initializer
fs/reiser4/page_cache.c:566: error: unknown field ‘commit_write’ specified in initializer
make[2]: *** [fs/reiser4/page_cache.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/reiser4] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2 _________________ this is a strange strange world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hephooey n00b
Joined: 24 Feb 2003 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just tried the lastest git pull, but got a link error:
Quote: | ERROR: "pat_enabled" [drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko] undefined!
|
Update:
The problem above is some kind of being solved by compile drm into the kernel, now I have the following "Section mismatch" and another undefined reference:
Quote: | WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x281): Section mismatch in reference from the function init_post() to the function .init.text:prepare_namespace()
The function init_post() references
the function __init prepare_namespace().
This is often because init_post lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of prepare_namespace is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x2847f): Section mismatch in reference from the function notify_cpu_starting() to the variable .cpuinit.data:cpu_chain
The function notify_cpu_starting() references
the variable __cpuinitdata cpu_chain.
This is often because notify_cpu_starting lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of cpu_chain is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.cpuinit.text+0x1abf): Section mismatch in reference from the function cpu_init() to the function .init.text:init_thread_xstate()
The function __cpuinit cpu_init() references
a function __init init_thread_xstate().
If init_thread_xstate is only used by cpu_init then
annotate init_thread_xstate with a matching annotation.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.cpuinit.data+0x0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable initial_code to the function .init.text:i386_start_kernel()
The variable __cpuinitdata initial_code references
a function __init i386_start_kernel().
If i386_start_kernel is only used by initial_code then
annotate i386_start_kernel with a matching annotation.
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
WARNING: init/built-in.o(.text+0x281): Section mismatch in reference from the function init_post() to the function .init.text:prepare_namespace()
The function init_post() references
the function __init prepare_namespace().
This is often because init_post lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of prepare_namespace is wrong.
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_do_probe_ddc_edid':
(.text+0x6a2a3): undefined reference to `i2c_transfer'
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jurek n00b
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.28-rc3-zen1
Quote: | CC block/blk-core.o
CC block/blk-barrier.o
block/blk-core.c: In function ‘blk_invoke_request_fn’:
block/blk-core.c:345: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
block/blk-core.c: In function ‘blk_unfreeze_timeout’:
block/blk-core.c:365: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘kblockd_schedule_work’ from incompatible pointer type
block/blk-core.c:365: error: too few arguments to function ‘kblockd_schedule_work’
block/blk-core.c: In function ‘blk_invoke_request_fn’:
block/blk-core.c:398: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_start_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:392: error: previous definition of ‘blk_start_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:419: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_stop_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:415: error: previous definition of ‘blk_stop_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:440: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_sync_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:436: error: previous definition of ‘blk_sync_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:462: error: non-static declaration of ‘__blk_run_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:452: error: previous definition of ‘__blk_run_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:482: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_run_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:475: error: previous definition of ‘blk_run_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:508: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_cleanup_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:490: error: previous definition of ‘blk_cleanup_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:511: error: invalid storage class for function ‘blk_init_free_list’
block/blk-core.c:533: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_alloc_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:530: error: previous definition of ‘blk_alloc_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:566: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_alloc_queue_node’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:536: error: previous definition of ‘blk_alloc_queue_node’ was here
block/blk-core.c:605: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_init_queue’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:602: error: previous definition of ‘blk_init_queue’ was here
block/blk-core.c:658: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_init_queue_node’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:609: error: previous definition of ‘blk_init_queue_node’ was here
block/blk-core.c:671: error: invalid storage class for function ‘blk_free_request’
block/blk-core.c:679: error: invalid storage class for function ‘blk_alloc_request’
block/blk-core.c:705: error: invalid storage class for function ‘ioc_batching’
block/blk-core.c:726: error: invalid storage class for function ‘ioc_set_batching’
block/blk-core.c:735: error: invalid storage class for function ‘__freed_request’
block/blk-core.c:754: error: invalid storage class for function ‘freed_request’
block/blk-core.c:775: error: invalid storage class for function ‘get_request’
block/blk-core.c:878: error: invalid storage class for function ‘get_request_wait’
block/blk-core.c:933: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_get_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:916: error: previous definition of ‘blk_get_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:955: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_start_queueing’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:947: error: previous definition of ‘blk_start_queueing’ was here
block/blk-core.c:978: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_requeue_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:968: error: previous definition of ‘blk_requeue_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1028: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_insert_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1001: error: previous definition of ‘blk_insert_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1036: error: invalid storage class for function ‘add_request’
block/blk-core.c:1048: error: invalid storage class for function ‘part_round_stats_single’
block/blk-core.c:1084: error: non-static declaration of ‘part_round_stats’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1077: error: previous definition of ‘part_round_stats’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1113: error: non-static declaration of ‘__blk_put_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1090: error: previous definition of ‘__blk_put_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1124: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_put_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1116: error: previous definition of ‘blk_put_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1168: error: invalid storage class for function ‘__make_request’
block/blk-core.c:1303: error: invalid storage class for function ‘blk_partition_remap’
block/blk-core.c:1319: error: invalid storage class for function ‘handle_bad_sector’
block/blk-core.c:1363: error: invalid storage class for function ‘should_fail_request’
block/blk-core.c:1373: error: invalid storage class for function ‘bio_check_eod’
block/blk-core.c:1423: error: invalid storage class for function ‘__generic_make_request’
block/blk-core.c:1554: error: non-static declaration of ‘generic_make_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1516: error: previous definition of ‘generic_make_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1596: error: non-static declaration of ‘submit_bio’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1567: error: previous definition of ‘submit_bio’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1642: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_rq_check_limits’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1620: error: previous definition of ‘blk_rq_check_limits’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1677: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_insert_cloned_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1650: error: previous definition of ‘blk_insert_cloned_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1695: error: invalid storage class for function ‘__end_that_request_first’
block/blk-core.c:1810: error: invalid storage class for function ‘end_that_request_last’
block/blk-core.c:1867: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_rq_bytes’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1861: error: previous definition of ‘blk_rq_bytes’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1883: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_rq_cur_bytes’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1874: error: previous definition of ‘blk_rq_cur_bytes’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1910: error: non-static declaration of ‘end_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1902: error: previous definition of ‘end_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:1914: error: invalid storage class for function ‘end_that_request_data’
block/blk-core.c:1950: error: invalid storage class for function ‘blk_end_io’
block/blk-core.c:1988: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_end_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:1985: error: previous definition of ‘blk_end_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2014: error: non-static declaration of ‘__blk_end_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:2004: error: previous definition of ‘__blk_end_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2035: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_end_bidi_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:2032: error: previous definition of ‘blk_end_bidi_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2065: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_update_request’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:2053: error: previous definition of ‘blk_update_request’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2098: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_end_request_callback’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:2095: error: previous definition of ‘blk_end_request_callback’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2148: error: non-static declaration of ‘blk_lld_busy’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:2142: error: previous definition of ‘blk_lld_busy’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2154: error: non-static declaration of ‘kblockd_schedule_work’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:2151: error: previous definition of ‘kblockd_schedule_work’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2160: error: non-static declaration of ‘kblockd_flush_work’ follows static declaration
block/blk-core.c:2157: error: previous definition of ‘kblockd_flush_work’ was here
block/blk-core.c:2175: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
make[1]: *** [block/blk-core.o] Błąd 1
make[1]: *** Oczekiwanie na niezakończone zadania....
make: *** [block] Błąd 2
make: *** Oczekiwanie na niezakończone zadania....
[root@speed2 kernel]#
|
_________________ C2Q 9550@4.0 Ghz - Asus P5Q-E - GTX 260 216sp - 4 GB DDR2 OCZ Titanium 1150 - Samsung HD103SJ 1TB - Cooler Master 590 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gaelic Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 119 Location: Vienna, Austria, Europe, World, Solar System, Milky Way, Universe
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
same problem here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Babau n00b
Joined: 07 Jun 2005 Posts: 22
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tranquilcool Veteran
Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 1243
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CC block/blk-core.o
block/blk-core.c: In function ‘blk_unfreeze_timeout’:
block/blk-core.c:366: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘kblockd_schedule_work’ from incompatible pointer type
block/blk-core.c:366: error: too few arguments to function ‘kblockd_schedule_work’
make[1]: *** [block/blk-core.o] Error 1
make: *** [block] Error 2
latest git pull. _________________ this is a strange strange world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ponciarello Apprentice
Joined: 22 Jul 2008 Posts: 223 Location: beach of slack
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | $ uname -a
Linux toscibo 2.6.28-rc3-zen1 #13 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 3 23:04:50 CET 2008 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T8100 @ 2.10GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux |
and toshiba acpi module compiles |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tranquilcool Veteran
Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 1243
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Preparing nvidia module
make -j3 HOSTCC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc CROSS_COMPILE=i686-pc-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS= IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=yes V=1 SYSSRC=/usr/src/linux SYSOUT=/usr/src/linux HOST_CC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc clean module
If you are using a Linux 2.4 kernel, please make sure
you either have configured kernel sources matching your
kernel or the correct set of kernel headers installed
on your system.
If you are using a Linux 2.6 kernel, please make sure
you have configured kernel sources matching your kernel
installed on your system. If you specified a separate
output directory using either the "KBUILD_OUTPUT" or
the "O" KBUILD parameter, make sure to specify this
directory with the SYSOUT environment variable or with
the equivalent nvidia-installer command line option.
Depending on where and how the kernel sources (or the
kernel headers) were installed, you may need to specify
their location with the SYSSRC environment variable or
the equivalent nvidia-installer command line option.
*** Unable to determine the target kernel version. ***
make: *** [select_makefile] Error 1
*
* ERROR: x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.12-r2 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
* environment, line 3738: Called linux-mod_src_compile
* environment, line 2788: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* eval "emake HOSTCC=\"$(tc-getBUILD_CC)\" CROSS_COMPILE=${CHOST}- LDFLAGS=\"$(get_abi_LDFLAGS)\" ${BUILD_FIXES} ${BUILD_PARAMS} ${BUILD_TARGETS} " || die "Unable to emake HOSTCC="$(tc-getBUILD_CC)" CROSS_COMPILE=${CHOST}- LDFLAGS="$(get_abi_LDFLAGS)" ${BUILD_FIXES} ${BUILD_PARAMS} ${BUILD_TARGETS}";
* The die message:
* Unable to emake HOSTCC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc CROSS_COMPILE=i686-pc-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS= IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=yes V=1 SYSSRC=/usr/src/linux SYSOUT=/usr/src/linux HOST_CC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc clean module
well nvidia-drivers doesn't compile.
kernel is perfect and real fast. thanks!
now i hope i get nvidia to compile. _________________ this is a strange strange world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034 Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.12-r2 |
no. _________________ IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tranquilcool Veteran
Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 1243
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cheater1034 wrote: | Quote: | x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.12-r2 |
no. |
well it could be done.
on page 14 there's keenblade link to an nvidia-patch.
i used the patch manually. ie i patched line by line and it compiled. _________________ this is a strange strange world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mroconnor Guru
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 402 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wasnt tp_smapi in the kernel yesterday but after pulling today I dont see it. Is it still causing issues? Also I am still having the blk_freeze error on this kernel.
Other then that it seems to work great, it boots so FAST.
Thanks guys. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tranquilcool Veteran
Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 1243
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tranquilcool wrote: | cheater1034 wrote: | Quote: | x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.12-r2 |
no. |
well it could be done.
on page 14 there's keenblade link to an nvidia-patch.
i used the patch manually. ie i patched line by line and it compiled. |
the patch doesn't apply automatically. it has to be done
line by line. NVIDIA_kernel-173.14-2990799.diff patch in zen-overlay will fail because of this. _________________ this is a strange strange world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034 Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tranquilcool wrote: | tranquilcool wrote: | cheater1034 wrote: | Quote: | x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.12-r2 |
no. |
well it could be done.
on page 14 there's keenblade link to an nvidia-patch.
i used the patch manually. ie i patched line by line and it compiled. |
the patch doesn't apply automatically. it has to be done
line by line. NVIDIA_kernel-173.14-2990799.diff patch in zen-overlay will fail because of this. |
I will re-diff one, i just thought i'd try it as-is
*edit*
Done _________________ IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tranquilcool Veteran
Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 1243
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
cheater1034 wrote: | tranquilcool wrote: | tranquilcool wrote: | cheater1034 wrote: | Quote: | x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.12-r2 |
no. |
well it could be done.
on page 14 there's keenblade link to an nvidia-patch.
i used the patch manually. ie i patched line by line and it compiled. |
the patch doesn't apply automatically. it has to be done
line by line. NVIDIA_kernel-173.14-2990799.diff patch in zen-overlay will fail because of this. |
I will re-diff one, i just thought i'd try it as-is
*edit*
Done |
works perfectly.
thanks! _________________ this is a strange strange world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seqizz Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now complied but i can't use my "Fn" keys to set my screen brightness anymore. And this should be a problem:
Code: | Method "CreateBluetoothSession" with signature "ss" on interface "org.openobex.Manager" doesn't exist |
Shown with 28-rc3-x, maybe one of my other updates causes that, can i fill a bug to bugs.gentoo.org with zen? in this case?
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/6776/ekrangoruntusufiletranshh6.png |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034 Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
seqizz wrote: | Now complied but i can't use my "Fn" keys to set my screen brightness anymore. And this should be a problem:
Code: | Method "CreateBluetoothSession" with signature "ss" on interface "org.openobex.Manager" doesn't exist |
Shown with 28-rc3-x, maybe one of my other updates causes that, can i fill a bug to bugs.gentoo.org with zen? in this case?
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/6776/ekrangoruntusufiletranshh6.png |
If the bug shows on linus upstream then go ahead and file a bug (i'd bet it does) _________________ IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mroconnor Guru
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 402 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hate to bitch about it again, especially because I think it is me who is missing something, but I thought I saw a tp_smapi merge when I pulled last evening around 22:00 EST but I checked the log this AM and cant find it. SO when I went to menuconfig there was no tp_smapi. Safe to assume I was seeing things? Or is smapi in a different spot now? I heard talk of it getting put into libata but not sure if that happened yet.
Sorry to bother about something so trivial, thanks guys. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034 Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mroconnor wrote: | I hate to bitch about it again, especially because I think it is me who is missing something, but I thought I saw a tp_smapi merge when I pulled last evening around 22:00 EST but I checked the log this AM and cant find it. SO when I went to menuconfig there was no tp_smapi. Safe to assume I was seeing things? Or is smapi in a different spot now? I heard talk of it getting put into libata but not sure if that happened yet.
Sorry to bother about something so trivial, thanks guys. |
smapi is broken _________________ IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mroconnor Guru
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 402 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks cheater. I am trying to find some reading about what specifically is broken about smapi. Because I have a plethora of leisure time you know |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buubuu n00b
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
question:
my system is using swap like crazy lately... did something change? (patches.. CK swappiness?..)
cus it didnt use any swap in like the previous 1000 kernels that i used from zen and now its using and slowing my machine... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ponciarello Apprentice
Joined: 22 Jul 2008 Posts: 223 Location: beach of slack
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry people for the (not so much) OT, but have a look here: I've added mine for promoting
zen is first in the all list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rmh3093 Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2003 Posts: 2138 Location: Albany, NY
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
buubuu wrote: | question:
my system is using swap like crazy lately... did something change? (patches.. CK swappiness?..)
cus it didnt use any swap in like the previous 1000 kernels that i used from zen and now its using and slowing my machine... |
we havent used CK patches in a long time, maybe you have a memory leak in one of your apps _________________ Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|