View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:00 pm Post subject: Purchase advice for Sun computers |
|
|
Ok, first off, I'm unsure if this should go here or in OTW, so if it gets moved, no worries.
I'm about to receive a moderate settlement from a lawsuit, and I wish to invest about $1000 USD into a sparc based server. I'd like at least a quad core capable unit, and avadiabl;e memory is more important to me than processor speed. I want hardware SCSI raid, bnut have a x86 solution for that i can continue to use. I do want an efficent unit. And of course it must be abl;e to run gentoo.
this would be a combo mail, web and file server. it may also eventually serve up to 1000 thin clients
Rack mount is perfered, and used is perfectly fine as long as it is in good condition.
Reccomendations?
NQS _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex.blackbit Advocate
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 2397
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1k$ is not much for a sparc server. why do you want one?
the t1000 is the smallest to my knowledge, and it is too expensive for you.
so a new machine does not seem to be an option. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex.blackbit Advocate
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 2397
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:40 pm Post subject: Re: Purchase advice for Sun computers |
|
|
NotQuiteSane wrote: | I'd like at least a quad core capable unit |
multi-core processors are a state-of-the-art technique that is not available on old servers.
or did you mean multi-processor? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:17 am Post subject: Re: Purchase advice for Sun computers |
|
|
alex.blackbit wrote: | NotQuiteSane wrote: | I'd like at least a quad core capable unit |
multi-core processors are a state-of-the-art technique that is not available on old servers.
or did you mean multi-processor? |
Multi processor
I shold have said a quad chip unit
although a quad core, quad chip unit would be nice.
NQS _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
armin76 Retired Dev
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/eolSystemList
Have a look at entry-level servers and midrange. But lookout, because some of them are x86.
By the specs you're asking(quad processor), not looking at the prices, from old to new(EOL date, therefore, newer = higher price + higher speed) i'd say:
- Enterprise 450 (4x480MHz U-II Max.)
- Fire 420R(4x450MHz U-II Max.)
- Enterprise 4500(14x464MHz U-II Max.)
- Fire V880(8x1200MHz U-III Max.)
- Fire V440(4x1593MHz U-IIIi Max.)
Obviously you need to find one which matches your 4proc specs, but those are capable of having them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Simba7 l33t
Joined: 22 Jan 2007 Posts: 708 Location: Billings, MT, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why not go x64?
Jeez.. and the price of SCSI drives vs. SATA drives anyway.. and the upkeep.. You might as well just build a server from scratch.
What's so important that you *NEED* a Sparc-based server anyway? The latest C2D's can smear even an older Quad-Proc system.
P.S. That's too damn much for an out-of-date server anyway. Sheesh, I picked up my Quad P4 2.0GHz Xeon (HP Proliant DL580 G2) for $150. As for the tower, that's not a bad price (if it would power on). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mattst88 Developer
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 423
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Before purchasing a Quad Processor SPARC box, you should first check the heat output (in BTUs) and power consumption. Most are better purchased as electric heaters than servers.
If you're interested in Alternative Architectures, I'd recommend researching Alpha and PA-RISC systems. _________________ My Wiki page |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
armin76 wrote: | http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/eolSystemList
Have a look at entry-level servers and midrange. But lookout, because some of them are x86.
By the specs you're asking(quad processor), not looking at the prices, from old to new(EOL date, therefore, newer = higher price + higher speed) i'd say:
- Enterprise 450 (4x480MHz U-II Max.)
- Fire 420R(4x450MHz U-II Max.)
- Enterprise 4500(14x464MHz U-II Max.)
- Fire V880(8x1200MHz U-III Max.)
- Fire V440(4x1593MHz U-IIIi Max.)
Obviously you need to find one which matches your 4proc specs, but those are capable of having them. |
I've pretty much decided on this
Just waiting on the money for it. i'm settling out of court, but we're in the off/counter offer stage.
NQS _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Simba7 l33t
Joined: 22 Jan 2007 Posts: 708 Location: Billings, MT, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I still think you're crazy if you're just getting 1 server.
Why not wait and get 2 for redundancy (especially if you're going to be running 1000+ thin clients on it). That way if it goes down, you're not completely screwed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Simba7 wrote: | I still think you're crazy if you're just getting 1 server.
Why not wait and get 2 for redundancy (especially if you're going to be running 1000+ thin clients on it). That way if it goes down, you're not completely screwed. |
Because my budget is only $1000 for the server, although if i happened to come across an unpopulated FC-SATA array I might be tempted to spend another $500 on it.
I'm not going to be running that many thin clients to start, i'm working into running that many eventually, as beowolf nodes.
of course i could always do like my brother thinks i should and just buy a Z-series instead, but he's a Power fanboy
NQS _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex.blackbit Advocate
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 2397
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
z-series for 1k$?
you need more per month to pay the license fees to ibm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mattst88 Developer
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 423
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good Lord man!
4680 BTU/hr heat output
1370 W power usage
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/E4500/spec
I hope you are factoring in the costs of paying for a huge increase in electricity (server + AC to counter the 4680 BTU/hr).
You really ought to get a more modern system with (1) newer generation processors, (2) much less power usage, and (3) much much much (I can't stress this enough) less heat output. _________________ My Wiki page |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex.blackbit wrote: | z-series for 1k$?
you need more per month to pay the license fees to ibm. |
I wish, i'd resell it. i couldn't find a z series for under 30K
NQS _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
first off I pay a flat fee for rent + utilities, and my landlord is already aware of the power consumption, this will actually decrease consumption, compared to the 2 dozen (not all are on 24/7) 450W x86 boxes i currently use.
using 1 watt = 3.412141633 BTU/Hr, 24 450W x86 boxes produce 36 851.1296 BTU's
on the flip side, 1000 4 watt sunray 2 produce 13 648.5665 + 4680 = 18 328.5665, or roughly half the heat output.
using the data here we see that 24 2ghz computer have 96 Gflops, where as 14 450 + 1000 or (2 * .4 * 14) + (.333 * 1000 * 2) = 677.2 gives 18 times the efficency
Quote: | You really ought to get a more modern system with (1) newer generation processors, (2) much less power usage, and (3) much much much (I can't stress this enough) less heat output. |
which is more 100 $ 5 or $100?
anyhow i gotta type up a paper, so i'll get back to this later
NQS _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Simba7 l33t
Joined: 22 Jan 2007 Posts: 708 Location: Billings, MT, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
...and you think an old Sun system can do 96Gflops? You're crazy..
Not to mention, there's a *HUGE* difference between a P4 and a C2D or a C2Q.
If you want the Tflops in a small package, just invest in a couple of PS3's. http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=220 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mattst88 Developer
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 423
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
NotQuiteSane,
Excellent. I'm very glad you have in fact considered these points. _________________ My Wiki page |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Simba7 wrote: | ...and you think an old Sun system can do 96Gflops? You're crazy..
Not to mention, there's a *HUGE* difference between a P4 and a C2D or a C2Q.
If you want the Tflops in a small package, just invest in a couple of PS3's. http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=220 |
a beuwoulf cluster using a sparc system for the head and 1K sun ray 2 clients can /theoretically/ reach 96 GFlops. thats 1014 chips, not "an old sun"
and thwe ps3's don't have sparc, and i want sparc
nqs _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Simba7 l33t
Joined: 22 Jan 2007 Posts: 708 Location: Billings, MT, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
NotQuiteSane wrote: | a beuwoulf cluster using a sparc system for the head and 1K sun ray 2 clients can /theoretically/ reach 96 GFlops. thats 1014 chips, not "an old sun"
and thwe ps3's don't have sparc, and i want sparc
nqs |
Um.. did I just mention Tflops, not Gflops? Just 1 PS3 can do around 2 TeraFlops.
Plus, why are you incredibly into the Sparc architecture?
..and as for the 1014 chips, my darn Video Card can go much higher than 96GFlops. Let's see.. .096TFlops or 2.4Tflops.. Hmm.. http://game.amd.com/us-en/unlock_radeonhd4870x2.aspx
Once Sparc can do over a TeraFlop on a single chip that doesn't cost over $10k, then they'll catch my attention once again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NotQuiteSane Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 488 Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Simba7 wrote: | NotQuiteSane wrote: | a beuwoulf cluster using a sparc system for the head and 1K sun ray 2 clients can /theoretically/ reach 96 GFlops. thats 1014 chips, not "an old sun"
and thwe ps3's don't have sparc, and i want sparc
nqs |
Um.. did I just mention Tflops, not Gflops? Just 1 PS3 can do around 2 TeraFlops. |
yes. hey, how about we compare the ps3 to my commodore. bet it's more powerful what with it being newer.
and if you read what i said, i said the whole cluster has that potential, not (just) an old sun.
Quote: | Plus, why are you incredibly into the Sparc architecture? |
because i like the orginating company from a technological point of view. there are several early Sun founders and lead employees that i idolize and influnced my choice to become an engineer.
a better measurement was pointed out to me. bus speed * data bus * clock speed * cores * N chips.
so a 300 mhz ultra 2 would be 33 mhz * 567 bits *300 or 5 613 300
a 2ghz p4 would be 33 * 128bits * 2000 or 8 448 000 or about 33% faster. this isn't that big a gap over the ultra, when you consider if you compare machines of the same age, a 533 k62 with a bus speed of 33 and a 64 bit data bus was "top of the line", only scoring 1 125 696 using this formula, or one fith the speed of the ultra 2.
and just for refrence, a t2 chip gives us 1.4ghz w/ 8 cores, or 209 563 200 per chip installed. what is the bus speed and data bus on a ps3?
Quote: | Once Sparc can do over a TeraFlop on a single chip that doesn't cost over $10k, then they'll catch my attention once again. |
well considering the ps3 can't do that... it uses 7 chips to reach it's 2 teraflops
and we won't bother discussing the t2 design is GPL'd
nqs _________________ These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.
As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location
To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|