Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
AMD64 system slow/unresponsive during disk access...
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 36, 37, 38  
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo on AMD64
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Yamakuzure
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 2297
Location: Adendorf, Germany

PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wrc1944 wrote:
For those having this problem, especially if they have SATA drives, it would probably be worth a shot to try the deadline scheduler instead of cfq.
(...)
Code:
 elevator=deadline
For me this has started a nightmare. Once I rebooted the system almost stopped on the tiniest bit of disk activity. While starting openOffice Calc I had to wait 16 (sixteen!) seconds until a page in firefox started scrolling when I used the mouse wheel. :-(

It is really frustrating that this problem seems to be so differently and widespread, that it's seemingly impossible to get a grip on (or even an idea about) what the problem actually *is*. :x
_________________
Edited 220,176 times by Yamakuzure
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elv13
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 388
Location: Socialist land of North America

PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

devsk wrote:
Elv13 wrote:
So far so good for me! Kernel 2.6.30 was a huge improvement over 2.6.2[0-9] and 2.6.31 seem to ba as stable and fast. And I finally removed debugging support from my kernel, I hope to never have it enable again :p. I think this solve the issue in my case, 64bit Linux is now exploiting the whole potential of my computer!

EDIT: Ignore my comment, skip this kernel, it suck, I am reverting to 2.6.30 right now.
what happened? elaborate please.


Simple, the mouse freeze once again and the system become unresponsive when I emerge something, even the sound lagg, It was almost perfect with my old 2.6.30-rc5 kernel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Belliash
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 2503
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Elv13 wrote:
devsk wrote:
Elv13 wrote:
So far so good for me! Kernel 2.6.30 was a huge improvement over 2.6.2[0-9] and 2.6.31 seem to ba as stable and fast. And I finally removed debugging support from my kernel, I hope to never have it enable again :p. I think this solve the issue in my case, 64bit Linux is now exploiting the whole potential of my computer!

EDIT: Ignore my comment, skip this kernel, it suck, I am reverting to 2.6.30 right now.
what happened? elaborate please.


Simple, the mouse freeze once again and the system become unresponsive when I emerge something, even the sound lagg, It was almost perfect with my old 2.6.30-rc5 kernel.


i follow this thread since some time...
and it is hard for me to confirm anything from what U said.
of course it has some troubles, but i cannot say it depends on amd64 arch...

I cannot remember when mouse freezed last time :| however sometime it could be a little bit faster, eg when more tabs opened in firefox...
_________________
Asio Software Technologies
Belliash IT Weblog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
niick
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've just tried doing what is suggested here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/10/229

This is a little subjective but the desktop does feel more responsive. YMMV
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elv13
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 388
Location: Socialist land of North America

PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@Belliash:
Mouse freeze seem to be the common denominator of this problem, if you don't experience them, then you don't have the problem. Firefox is slow under Linux and even more in 64bit Linux (no asm optimisation). But that not related to this problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

niick wrote:
I've just tried doing what is suggested here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/10/229

This is a little subjective but the desktop does feel more responsive. YMMV


++

that setting disables (un)fair scheduling but it's somewhat broken anyways :wink:

in addition I've also the following enabled:

Quote:
echo "100000" > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_latency_ns
#echo "40000000" > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_latency_ns
# default: 40000000 (40.000.000)

echo "200000" > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_min_granularity_ns
#echo "8000000" > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_min_granularity_ns
# default: 8000000 (8.000.000)

_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lagalopex
Guru
Guru


Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 565

PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

niick wrote:
I've just tried doing what is suggested here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/10/229

This is a little subjective but the desktop does feel more responsive. YMMV


I did so as well. But have no time at the moment to test, but feels good at this point ;)
But there may be some regressions: "CK is working on a new scheduler for Multimedia/Gaming PCs"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
natros
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about BFS Scheduler?
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=bfs_scheduler_benchmarks&num=1
_________________
-=[abit ip35 pro core2quad q6600 (oc 3.0 ghz) 8 gb ram 2x320 raid0 ext4 xfx8800gt 512mb]=-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mamunata
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 169

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

noop is the best choice for me at the moment - with kernel 2.6.30-r6, despite in some moments load is 5 and more and mouse and start to freeze
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elv13
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 388
Location: Socialist land of North America

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am back to 2.6.30-vanilla-rc5, until now, it is the best kernel I have tried (I tried 2.6.30-r* too). I think I am going to stay with this one for a long period of time. I upgraded it to GCC 4.4 and disabled kernel hacking, it work even better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
timeBandit
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 2719
Location: here, there or in transit

PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Locked for length (well over 30 pages).
Continued in AMD64 system slow/unresponsive during disk access (Part 2).
_________________
Plants are pithy, brooks tend to babble--I'm content to lie between them.
Super-short f.g.o checklist: Search first, strip comments, mark solved, help others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo on AMD64 All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 36, 37, 38
Page 38 of 38

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum