Official thread: "zen-sources" - Part 8

Rion · Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:12 am Post subject:

is here any easy way to downgrade alsa to 1.0.20?
1.0.21 doesn't work properly for me. :-(

PS zen-stable
_________________
rion-overlay

DigitalCorpus · Apprentice Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Posts: 283

asturm · Developer Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9264

mantoo · Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:07 pm Post subject:

git down... need backup, need backup...

cheater1034 · Veteran Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558

cheater1034 · Veteran Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558

Back up:
git://zen-sources.org/kernel/zen-stable.git

zen.git will follow momentarily
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.

rahulthewall · Veteran Joined: 01 Nov 2007 Posts: 1264 Location: Zürich

Suspend and hibernate are still broken with bfs-300.
_________________
Who shall guard the guards?

cheater1034 · Veteran Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558

tranquilcool · Veteran Joined: 25 Mar 2005 Posts: 1246

to get nvidia-drivers-190.36 to compile with 2.6.32(zen.git)

here is a patch to apply to toolchain-funcs.eclass in /usr/portage/eclass/

--- toolchain-funcs.eclass.old 2009-09-02 13:12:39.000000000 -0700
+++ toolchain-funcs.eclass 2009-10-03 17:56:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -187,7 +187,8 @@
# Starting with linux-2.6.24, the 'x86_64' and 'i386'
# trees have been unified into 'x86'.
# FreeBSD still uses i386
- if [[ ${type} == "kern" ]] && [[ $(KV_to_int ${KV}) -lt $(KV_to_int 2.6.24) || ${host} == *freebsd* ]] ; then
+ # In 2.6.32, this has been changed back.
+ if [[ ${type} == "kern" ]] && [[ $(KV_to_int ${KV}) -lt $(KV_to_int 2.6.24) ]] || [[ $(KV_to_int ${KV}) -ge $(KV_to_int 2.6.32) ]] || ${host} == *freebsd* ]] ; then
echo i386
else
echo x86
@@ -230,10 +231,11 @@
x86_64*)
# Starting with linux-2.6.24, the 'x86_64' and 'i386'
# trees have been unified into 'x86'.
- if [[ ${type} == "kern" ]] && [[ $(KV_to_int ${KV}) -ge $(KV_to_int 2.6.24) ]] ; then
+ # In 2.6.32-rc1, this has been changed back.
+ if [[ ${type} == "kern" ]] && [[ $(KV_to_int ${KV}) -ge $(KV_to_int 2.6.24) ]] && [[ $(KV_to_int ${KV}) -lt $(KV_to_int 2.6.32) ]] ; then
echo x86
else
- ninj x86_64 amd64
+ echo x86_64
fi
;;
_________________
this is a strange strange world.

asturm · Developer Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9264

wrc1944 · Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:38 pm Post subject:

Link to git posted above doesn't work- all I get is:

asturm · Developer Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9264

It has changed again to 'git://zen-sources.org/kernel/zen-stable.git', just alter your .git/config accordingly.

wrc1944 · Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:44 pm Post subject:

Thanks genstorm,
I tried

kernelOfTruth · Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject:

kernelOfTruth · Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:14 pm Post subject:

rahulthewall · Veteran Joined: 01 Nov 2007 Posts: 1264 Location: Zürich

wrc1944 · Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:45 pm Post subject:

kernelOfTruth,
Thanks for the info. In my post above (2nd edit- maybe you missed it)), zen-stable wound up at 717mb.
However, all the 2.6 kernel.org sources I've ever used (hundreds) are all around 400mb, even patched heavily.

The only reason I used git clone was because this was the first time using zen git on this box.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but your post above seems more complicated that I thought this stuff was going to be.

I thought I just did the git clone routine the first time, and then for future zen-x versions on that base (e.g. linux-2.6.31, or whatever) I just needed to do a git pull in that directory to update the zen version, and then recompile.

That's wrong?

I've never read anything in "zen" threads about having to maintain a second "offical kernel.org overlay."
_________________
Main box- AsRock x370 Gaming K4
Ryzen 7 3700x, 3.6GHz, 16GB GSkill Flare DDR4 3200mhz
Samsung SATA 1000GB, Radeon HD R7 350 2GB DDR5
OpenRC Gentoo ~amd64 plasma, glibc-2.40-r5, gcc-14
kernel-6.11.3 USE=experimental python3_12.7-final-0

kernelOfTruth · Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:55 pm Post subject:

wrc1944 · Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:24 pm Post subject:

@kernelOfTruth,
As always, I benefit greatly from all your detailed and informative posts over the years, and always appreciate your willingness to spend time helping us Gentoo users. I'm sure I speak for a lot of people on this forum.
Thanks again!

_________________
Main box- AsRock x370 Gaming K4
Ryzen 7 3700x, 3.6GHz, 16GB GSkill Flare DDR4 3200mhz
Samsung SATA 1000GB, Radeon HD R7 350 2GB DDR5
OpenRC Gentoo ~amd64 plasma, glibc-2.40-r5, gcc-14
kernel-6.11.3 USE=experimental python3_12.7-final-0

cheater1034 · Veteran Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558

ponciarello · Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:09 am Post subject:

curiosity is killing me (

) so, after having tried bfs303 with zen-stable (all ok), I tried new zenunstable

manwithaplan1976 · Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:09 am Post subject:

I've been following the Zen Sources for couple of month's now ... And I just want so say thanks for such a great contribution... Zen stable ... has been working great with BFS on my Core2.
On earlier releases I had some issue's with reboot's and shutdowns & BFS instability. Since the recent git pull and a rebuild... Its stable, and is a pleasure tweaking to my hearts content.

I noticed on gitweb that the zen-overlay is missing, and from a recent layman -S ...? Am I assuming their will be no more zen-overlay with ebuilds..?

rahulthewall · Veteran Joined: 01 Nov 2007 Posts: 1264 Location: Zürich

dodo1122 · Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:48 pm Post subject:

yoshi314 · l33t Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 850 Location: PL

hmm, current zen-stable git (5692deda2c65ef19b303c96c8524dcacb310bc70) locks up when luks is about to open my partition. no message on screen, no kernel panic.

strange. fortunately i have -zen1 as a fallback, which is surprisingly stable (for me).

does anyone else have similar behavior?
_________________
~amd64
shrink your /usr/portage with squashfs+aufs