View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bonito Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 8:22 pm Post subject: portage suggestion |
|
|
I have noticed how the portags system works...and its really cool so far, but I noticed something I believe unnecessarily adds much time to things like "emerge system."
The portage system works in this manner from my perception:
download -> install -> download -> install...
Linux is a multitasking operating system...cant it be done like this:
download -> download -> download...
install -> install -> install ...
in other words, have the two processes running beside each other so that you are always utilizing your bandwidth and cpu cycles most effectively and complete the system (probably much sooner) The developers of this system seem like pretty smart men and women...has this already been thought of? is there a problem with this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 8:55 pm Post subject: Re: portage suggestion |
|
|
bonito wrote: | has this already been thought of? is there a problem with this? |
I can't find the link right now, but I know I've seen this talked about before. I believe it's in the works for the next release of Gentoo.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nitro Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Apr 2002 Posts: 661 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, other people discussed this a while back, take a peek at: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=11
I agree, it would be nice to have, I'm sure 56kers really need/like it. _________________ - Kyle Manna
Please, please SEARCH before posting.
There are three kinds of people in the world: those who can count, and those who can't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
febisfebi Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 76 Location: seattle wa
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
also it would be cool if there was options to either dl all packages, then compile at once, and another option to dl all packages, and compile one at a time, to have it take longer but less cpu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
febisfebi wrote: | also it would be cool if there was options to either dl all packages, then compile at once |
Well, you can sort of achieve this with:
Code: | emerge --fetchonly <packagename> |
It just requires a second emerge command to actually start the compile.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Psychephylax n00b
Joined: 10 May 2002 Posts: 44 Location: Smithtown, NY
|
Posted: Sat May 11, 2002 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, what happens if one compilation relies on the other? Won't you be getting the chicken before the egg syndrome and having the compiles crap out? _________________ Stupidity, like hydrogen, is one of the basic building blocks of the Universe. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Sat May 11, 2002 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Psychephylax wrote: | Also, what happens if one compilation relies on the other? |
emerge handles that -- it's pretty good with dependencies and figuring out compilation orders.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|