| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
albright
Advocate
Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 2588
Location: Near Toronto
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:04 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: | | Incorrect fixes on both cases |
Don't I know it 
updated git-stable working now ... many thanks
_________________
.... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpectreDragon
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 92
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
will there be updates in the unstable zen anytime soon or is it worth it to use stable zen for now?
btw.
last time I tried suspend to disk was still broken with btrfs, anyone who has it working?
suspend to ram works fine though  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kingoftherings
Guru
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 328
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SpectreDragon wrote: | will there be updates in the unstable zen anytime soon or is it worth it to use stable zen for now?
btw.
last time I tried suspend to disk was still broken with btrfs, anyone who has it working?
suspend to ram works fine though |
I was using zen.git when 2.6.32 came out and it went un-updated for two weeks until 2.6.33-rc1 came out. So that's likely what will happen this time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rahulthewall
Veteran
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 1264
Location: Zürich
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to be asking again, but can someone please explain these warnings:
| Code: |
.config:275:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
#
# configuration written to .config
#
include/config/auto.conf:346:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
|
Thanks
Rahul
_________________
Who shall guard the guards? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rahulthewall wrote: | Sorry to be asking again, but can someone please explain these warnings:
| Code: |
.config:275:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
#
# configuration written to .config
#
include/config/auto.conf:346:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
|
Thanks
Rahul |
I don't know what causes that, i need to look into it
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jupiter1TX
Guru
Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Location: 3rd Rock
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rahulthewall wrote: | Sorry to be asking again, but can someone please explain these warnings:
| Code: |
.config:275:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
#
# configuration written to .config
#
include/config/auto.conf:346:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
|
Thanks
Rahul |
That is because this an error in 'CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES=X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES'
I removed 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' part and error gone.
_________________
Core i7 920 D0 | Asus P6T DLX | Patriot Viper 1600 6GB | Antec Quattro 850W
Geforce 8800GTX OC2 768MB | Dell 22" LCD | Koolance Exos2/Swiftech GTZ
GCC 4.6.1 | 3.7.x-geek | Xorg-7.4-x | KDE-4.7.x | Compiz |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrazyMYKL
n00b
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jupiter1TX wrote: | | rahulthewall wrote: | Sorry to be asking again, but can someone please explain these warnings:
| Code: |
.config:275:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
#
# configuration written to .config
#
include/config/auto.conf:346:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
|
Thanks
Rahul |
That is because this an error in 'CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES=X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES'
I removed 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' part and error gone. |
Actually, changing it to | Code: | | CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES=$X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES |
fixes it.
_________________
<m00se> bash-2.05b$ ping god
<m00se> ping: unknown host god
<m00se> it's true, god doesn't exist
<AngstyPie> maybe he's just having DNS problems |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CrazyMYKL wrote: | | Jupiter1TX wrote: | | rahulthewall wrote: | Sorry to be asking again, but can someone please explain these warnings:
| Code: |
.config:275:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
#
# configuration written to .config
#
include/config/auto.conf:346:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES
|
Thanks
Rahul |
That is because this an error in 'CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES=X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES'
I removed 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' part and error gone. |
Actually, changing it to | Code: | | CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES=$X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES |
fixes it. |
This is not the problem, because auto.conf is an auto generated file.
The real problem lies in an actual Kconfig file, i believe it's in the amd-k10 branch - i'll fix it soon.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pappy_mcfae
Watchman
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 5999
Location: Pomona, California.
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Where is everyone finding patch sets for the .33-zen0 .33-zen1? I don't see them in my gits, and I dont' see them on the page. I R connfuzed
Cheers,
Pappy
_________________
This space left intentionally blank, except for these ASCII symbols. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ponciarello
Apprentice
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 223
Location: beach of slack
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
fixed the Kconfig issue, also added squashfs-linus.git 
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good stuff:
2.6.32-zen7 released
2.6.33-zen1 released
^^ both are winners
- 97 Registered on zen-kernel.org
- 53 Subscribed to the mailing list on groups.google.com
I think our user base is pretty good  , assuming the vast majority of users dont register at either place
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ant P.
Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I tried compiling a kernel with PAE, no highmem, and the full 1GB/3GB split option on a 32-bit Atom, and it wouldn't boot at all; it got stuck in an endless reboot cycle after the bootloader.
It does list "pae" in the /proc/cpuinfo flags though so I'm confused, should this work or not? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ant_P wrote: | I tried compiling a kernel with PAE, no highmem, and the full 1GB/3GB split option on a 32-bit Atom, and it wouldn't boot at all; it got stuck in an endless reboot cycle after the bootloader.
It does list "pae" in the /proc/cpuinfo flags though so I'm confused, should this work or not? |
Please share your .config, additionally try 2.6.33-ck1 to see if something is going on there.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fanthom
n00b
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 60
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi cheater1034,
i'm having troubles with compilation of aufs as (M) in 2.6.33-zen1 kernel:
| Code: | Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#1)
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 2408 modules
ERROR: "vfsmount_lock" [fs/aufs/aufs.ko] undefined! |
my config:
http://pastebin.com/NCzXwsAx
BTW thanks for great work on zen releases
EDIT:
looks like it's the same error which we faced in 2.6.32-zen2 and 2.6.32-zen3:
http://www.slax.org/forum.php?action=view&parentID=53917anchorid=54337#postid54337
Regards,
fanthom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fixed in git, or patch is here:
http://omploader.org/vM3FscQ
it alone isn't worth a hotfix for zen1, but git or not it's fixed now
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jw5801
Apprentice
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 251
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheater1034 wrote: | Good stuff:
2.6.32-zen7 released
2.6.33-zen1 released
^^ both are winners
- 97 Registered on zen-kernel.org
- 53 Subscribed to the mailing list on groups.google.com
I think our user base is pretty good , assuming the vast majority of users dont register at either place |
Should be another one registered on zen-kernel.org now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Saundersx
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 294
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Why was it87 disabled? I use that, and I know it was crazy with the acpi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fanthom
n00b
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 60
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheater1034 wrote: |
Fixed in git, or patch is here:
http://omploader.org/vM3FscQ
it alone isn't worth a hotfix for zen1, but git or not it's fixed now |
works!
thanks a lot |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Saundersx wrote: | | Why was it87 disabled? I use that, and I know it was crazy with the acpi. |
It's not disabled
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ant P.
Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cheater1034 wrote: | | Ant_P wrote: | I tried compiling a kernel with PAE, no highmem, and the full 1GB/3GB split option on a 32-bit Atom, and it wouldn't boot at all; it got stuck in an endless reboot cycle after the bootloader.
It does list "pae" in the /proc/cpuinfo flags though so I'm confused, should this work or not? |
Please share your .config, additionally try 2.6.33-ck1 to see if something is going on there. |
Working config
That's with highmem=64G turned on which forces PAE on too. I think it might be something to do with the 896/1G split options so I'm going to try that next.
Edit OK it works with 896/3G mem split, but not the 1G/3G split. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ant P.
Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 2G split option works fine with PAE so I'll use that for now.
BTW there's two options for that with identical names and no description for either, what's the difference? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Non_E
Apprentice
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 160
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:16 am Post subject: Thanks |
|
|
Hello,
I am running 2.6.33-zen1 without any (kernel related) problems. Thanks
_________________
Only Sith deals in absolutes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
broch
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
since yesterday I have problem with zen update:
| Quote: | $ sudo git pull
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly |
I wonder whether this is planned (e.g. server maintenance) or something changed (that I did not notice)?
Thank you |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pappy_mcfae
Watchman
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 5999
Location: Pomona, California.
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I too have been running 2.6.33-zen1 on this machine. I have had no real issues that have jumped out and bitten me, but I'm keeping watch.
It boots very quickly. It seems to run well. No issues as of yet.
Cheers,
Pappy
_________________
This space left intentionally blank, except for these ASCII symbols. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
