View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mreff555 Apprentice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 231 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:40 pm Post subject: does systemd work without a ramfs? |
|
|
Reinstalling with systemd. No particular reason other than I want to learn it.
I do not use a ramfs with my current kernel, but the articles I have read made it sound like I need to.
I'm still compiling and haven't rebooted, but I just wanted to know what to expect. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9824 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what I heard, unless you have split off /usr partition, you don't need an initramfs... _________________ Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
potuz Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2010 Posts: 378
|
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are a number of terms that you might be referring to: ramfs/tmpfs/initramd/rootfs https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.txt
If its an initramd image I can confirm eccerr0r's post cause I never used one in my systems and mine has been booting stable without a glich since last week's update to Gnome 3.8 with systemd. Actually the transition was smooth in my case. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mreff555 Apprentice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 231 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
eccerr0r wrote: | From what I heard, unless you have split off /usr partition, you don't need an initramfs... |
As it turns out it isn't needed.
Thanks, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|