View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
turtles Veteran
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 1698
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:42 am Post subject: Connect two hosts manually point to point?[solved] |
|
|
I have a test Gentoo router box called 'router' and a web server called 'server' <snip edited out eratta..>So now I would like to connect the two with a simple point to point connection. However I am unsuccessful with the following:
The router nic lan0 is configured as 192.168.2.1 and the server nic eth0 is 192.168.2.2
On the router I ran Code: | ifconfig lan0 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 up |
and Code: | route add -net 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 gw 192.168.2.2 dev lan0 |
on the server I ran Code: | ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up |
Code: | route add -net 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 gw 192.168.2.1 dev eth0 |
Now on the server I can run Code: | eth0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 broadcast 192.168.2.3
ether 00:03:47:0d:01:6e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
|
and the router reports:
Code: | lan0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 broadcast 192.168.2.255
inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fecf:6abc prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 00:0e:0c:cf:6a:bc txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 27 bytes 2124 (2.0 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
|
I am unable to ping either end.
I know I am missing something obvious! Like perhaps I need a cross over cable?
Thanks in advance! _________________ Donate to Gentoo
Last edited by turtles on Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:43 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
massimo Veteran
Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 1226
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do you have Gb ethernet otherwise you'd need crossover cabling. Apart from the you do not need to set up any additional routes. _________________ Hello 911? How are you? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chithanh Developer
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 2158 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unless you disabled it explicitly somewhere, both hosts will automagically get a link-local IPv6 address which should work fine for point-to-point communications. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pgu l33t
Joined: 30 Jul 2009 Posts: 722 Location: Oslo, Norway
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried to change either your netmask to 255.255.255.0 or your broadcast address to 192.168.2.3? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
turtles Veteran
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 1698
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
massimo wrote: | Do you have Gb ethernet otherwise you'd need crossover cabling. Apart from the you do not need to set up any additional routes. |
I think I do Code: | ethtool lan0
Settings for lan0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supported pause frame use: No
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: off (auto)
Supports Wake-on: umbg
Wake-on: g
Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: yes
|
chithanh I am not familiar with how to use ipV6. Did they both did show an IPv6 link local address in my ifconfig output above?
EDIT no it looks like I did not support ipv6 when I did the kernel for the server.
pgu wrote: | Have you tried to change either your netmask to 255.255.255.0 or your broadcast address to 192.168.2.3? |
No I dont think I did will as soon as the link to the server is back up it is down currently. _________________ Donate to Gentoo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54797 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
turtles,
Only the router has Code: | inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fecf:6abc prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> | which is an IPv6 link local address. _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
turtles Veteran
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 1698
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NeddySeagoon wrote: | turtles,
Only the router has Code: | inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fecf:6abc prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> | which is an IPv6 link local address. |
Thanks Neddy I think I do remember leaving ipv6 off in the server kernel.
The WAN to the server is currently still down I can get to the router though.
I look forward to understanding the broadcast address better
I tried 192.168.2.3 on the router as that is what the server is set to.
I have installed a ipcalc
and it tells me:
Code: |
ipcalc 192.168.2.2
Address: 192.168.2.2 11000000.10101000.00000010. 00000010
Netmask: 255.255.255.0 = 24 11111111.11111111.11111111. 00000000
Wildcard: 0.0.0.255 00000000.00000000.00000000. 11111111
=>
Network: 192.168.2.0/24 11000000.10101000.00000010. 00000000
HostMin: 192.168.2.1 11000000.10101000.00000010. 00000001
HostMax: 192.168.2.254 11000000.10101000.00000010. 11111110
Broadcast: 192.168.2.255 11000000.10101000.00000010. 11111111
Hosts/Net: 254 Class C, Private Internet
|
So perhaps the broadcast needs to be 192.168.2.255 ?
also I probably need to configure iptables on the router better. _________________ Donate to Gentoo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
turtles Veteran
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 1698
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks everyone for your help
It turns out the interface on the server was eth2
for reference how I determined that was:
Code: | cat /sys/class/net/eth2/carrier |
eth0 on the server turned out to be a fiber link I forgot about
Code: | cat: /sys/class/net/eth0/carrier: Invalid argument |
showed it was not connected.
Now to see if I can use iproute2 and iptables to forward a few ports over this link
On the server I did end up using:
Code: | inet 192.168.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.2.255 |
_________________ Donate to Gentoo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|