View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
himpierre l33t
Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 867 Location: Berlin
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolvenwraith n00b
Joined: 28 Dec 2003 Posts: 67 Location: Someplace, Somewhere
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
dang was that fast! I think I'm going to stick with 2.6.0 for now.
edit: happen to have a list of new things that were not in 2.6.0? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SlashGentoo n00b
Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Posts: 62 Location: Warsaw, Poland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, what are the differences? I just compiled my kernel like 11 days ago and don't feel like loosing my uptime |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nbensa l33t
Joined: 10 Jul 2002 Posts: 799 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sequentious Apprentice
Joined: 07 Jun 2002 Posts: 290 Location: London Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is the most lego-friendly kernel I have yet seen _________________ --
Chris I
chris@cidesign.ca :: www.cidesign.ca/~chris/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonfr Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 1008 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
i'm going to update like now |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ett_gramse_nap Apprentice
Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Posts: 252 Location: Göteborg, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are there any changes involving performance enhancements? Or are this one just "a patch" for bizarre hardware configurations? (Yes, I've read the changelog but can't seem to extract anything useful from it) _________________ Don't bother! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vdboor Guru
Joined: 03 Dec 2003 Posts: 592 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nbensa wrote: | http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.1 |
Do you also have a short version.. of those who like to ignore all little bits and pieces? _________________ The best way to accelerate a windows server is by 9.81M/S²
Linux user #311670 and Yet Another Perl Programmer
[ screenies | Coding on KMess ] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spb Retired Dev
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Posts: 2135 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vdboor wrote: | Do you also have a short version.. of those who like to ignore all little bits and pieces? |
Basically, drivers for some Lego hardware, USB fixes, and AMD64 and nForce2 AGP fixes. That's what stands out, anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mtv not bullets n00b
Joined: 07 Jan 2004 Posts: 19 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First impressions: exactly same config as 2.6.1rc3 results in broken sound support with emu10k1.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sequentious Apprentice
Joined: 07 Jun 2002 Posts: 290 Location: London Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mtv not bullets wrote: | First impressions: exactly same config as 2.6.1rc3 results in broken sound support with emu10k1.
| Did you do an oldconfig? _________________ --
Chris I
chris@cidesign.ca :: www.cidesign.ca/~chris/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mtv not bullets n00b
Joined: 07 Jan 2004 Posts: 19 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sequentious wrote: | Did you do an oldconfig? |
No, I just changed the stuff in menuconfig, since the only changes to default I had made on 2.6.1rc3 were adding the emu10k1 driver, devfs and ntfs (brand new install). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sequentious Apprentice
Joined: 07 Jun 2002 Posts: 290 Location: London Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mtv not bullets wrote: | Sequentious wrote: | Did you do an oldconfig? |
No, I just changed the stuff in menuconfig, since the only changes to default I had made on 2.6.1rc3 were adding the emu10k1 driver, devfs and ntfs (brand new install). | When using a .config file from a different kernel, you should always do a `make oldconfig`. _________________ --
Chris I
chris@cidesign.ca :: www.cidesign.ca/~chris/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mtv not bullets n00b
Joined: 07 Jan 2004 Posts: 19 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^^
yah, I didn't use the old config, I just change the default config around. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Trejkaz Guru
Joined: 14 Nov 2002 Posts: 479 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2004 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doesn't genkernel make oldconfig automatically?
Also... why is 2.6.1 not in vanilla-sources? It's an official release from kernel.org, so it should be in there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lemma Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 416 Location: Uppsala, Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2004 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sequentious wrote: | When using a .config file from a different kernel, you should always do a `make oldconfig`. | Why do you stress that? What is the difference between a 'make oldconfig' and a 'make menuconfig' loading an old config-file? I can se none ... _________________ Always make it as simple as possible, but no simpler
/Einstein |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dinini Apprentice
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 236
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2004 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lemma wrote: | What is the difference between a 'make oldconfig' and a 'make menuconfig' loading an old config-file? I can se none ... |
The "make oldconfig" scripts are the first updated with the dependency changes. The other scripts are usually changed later to match. In a perfect world it makes no difference. Unfortunately it has made a difference in a few compiles I've done. So I also give that advice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lemma Guru
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 416 Location: Uppsala, Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2004 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, you learn something every day _________________ Always make it as simple as possible, but no simpler
/Einstein |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|