View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
milomak Apprentice
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2021 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes the nvidia stuff was fluff
i was talking to the packages mentioned in that release. i realise it is unstable and so this type of thing thing can happen. and i am quite frankly happy to deal with such.
it just seems that given such a change, there would be more collaboration that the nvidia package is not the block
Code: |
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r2::gentoo 0 KiB
[blocks B ] <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98 ("<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r2)
[blocks B ] <=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1 ("<=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r2)
[blocks B ] <=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10 ("<=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r2)
Total: 1 package (1 new), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
Conflict: 3 blocks (3 unsatisfied)
|
and again let me highlight i understand working with unstable and how such things happen. i just think in this specific situation it may not have been handled as well as it could be. but no harm from my side. _________________ Desktop - Windows 10, Debian Sid, Gentoo Unstable, Arch Linux, Solus
Laptop - Windows 10, Debian Sid, Solus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9280
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2021 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Again, read the news item. It tells you exactly what list of packages to add to package.accept_keywords. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
milomak Apprentice
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'm really not sure where we are missing each other where you don't see what i was saying surely in building a new path like this much closer collaboration is needed
as i said on a few occasions i am running unstable
Code: |
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3::gentoo 0 KiB
[blocks B ] <=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1 ("<=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98 ("<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10 ("<=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
|
note the package versions doing the blocking. the very ones stated in the enews.
note what i am able to install
Code: |
# eix gui-libs/display-manager-init
* gui-libs/display-manager-init
Available versions: (~)1.0-r3
Homepage: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:X11
Description: RC init files for starting display and login managers |
i've had to mask it to be able to update this system _________________ Desktop - Windows 10, Debian Sid, Gentoo Unstable, Arch Linux, Solus
Laptop - Windows 10, Debian Sid, Solus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2021 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
asturm wrote: | Again, read the news item. It tells you exactly what list of packages to add to package.accept_keywords. |
The news item is out-of-date again. When is this going to happen for stable users? _________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anon-E-moose Watchman
Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6148 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2021 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
milomak wrote: |
Code: |
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3::gentoo 0 KiB
[blocks B ] <=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1 ("<=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98 ("<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10 ("<=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
|
|
Lets state things this way.
If you want to emerge gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3 then xinit installed version must be above xinit-1.4.1 and the same for the other two.
This is from the ebuild itself
Code: | RDEPEND="
sys-apps/gentoo-functions
!<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98
!<=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1
!<=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10
!=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2
" |
This ebuild will not install if the ! conditions are violated, this means that every package that's blocking must meet that criteria.
The 4 packages with the ! must be in package.accept or you must set ~ globally.
This has nothing to do with display manager being in accept. _________________ UM780, 6.1 zen kernel, gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9280
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2021 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's the puzzling bit - on an ~arch system all those versions are lining up anyway. So either there was some local mask in place or a different blocker affecting one of the listed packages, ideally to be trouble shooted in a new thread. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anon-E-moose Watchman
Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6148 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
If unsure whether there is something local, then something like grep -rE "xinit|sysvinit|xorg-server" /etc/portage would show it.
I'd also check to make sure it's really an ~arch system vs an arch system with some ~ packages, but that an end user check.
Edit to add: although if anything is causing a chain effect block it's likely to be something like nvidia drivers. _________________ UM780, 6.1 zen kernel, gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2021 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm stable amd64 and up-to-date. Here is what I get:
Code: | $ emerge -p display-manager-init
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies
... done!
[ebuild N ~] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3
[blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2 ("=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1 ("<=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98 ("<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2:0/1.20.10::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
x11-base/xorg-server required by @selected
(gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
display-manager-init
For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following
section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook (architecture is irrelevant):
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:X86/Working/Portage#Blocked_packages |
Herer is what I put in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords
Code: |
gui-libs/display-manager-init ~amd64
x11-apps/xinit ~amd64
x11-base/xorg-server ~amd64
sys-apps/sysvinit ~amd64
|
Code: | $ emerge -s xorg-server
[ Results for search key : xorg-server ]
Searching...
* x11-base/xorg-server
Latest version available: 1.20.10-r3
Latest version installed: 1.20.10-r2
Size of files: 6,160 KiB
Homepage: https://www.x.org/wiki/ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/xorg-server
Description: X.Org X servers
License: MIT
* x11-apps/xinit
Latest version available: 1.4.1-r1
Latest version installed: 1.4.1
Size of files: 173 KiB
Homepage: https://www.x.org/wiki/ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xinit
Description: X Window System initializer
License: MIT GPL-2
* sys-apps/sysvinit
Latest version available: 2.99
Latest version installed: 2.97
Size of files: 124 KiB
Homepage: https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/sysvinit
Description: /sbin/init - parent of all processes
License: GPL-2
|
Code: | $ emerge -1p xorg-server
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ~] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3
[ebuild U ~] x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r3 [1.20.10-r2]
[blocks b ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2 ("=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1 ("<=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98 ("<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>=x11-apps/xinit-1.3.3-r1 required by (x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r3:0/1.20.10::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) USE="elogind ipv6 udev xorg xvfb -debug -dmx -doc -kdrive (-libressl) -minimal (-selinux) -suid -systemd -unwind -wayland -xcsecurity -xephyr -xnest" ABI_X86="(64)"
(gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
gui-libs/display-manager-init required by (x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r3:0/1.20.10::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) USE="elogind ipv6 udev xorg xvfb -debug -dmx -doc -kdrive (-libressl) -minimal (-selinux) -suid -systemd -unwind -wayland -xcsecurity -xephyr -xnest" ABI_X86="(64)"
(sys-apps/sysvinit-2.97:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r6[selinux?] (>=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r6) required by (sys-apps/openrc-0.42.1-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="ncurses netifrc pam (split-usr) unicode -audit -bash -debug -newnet (-prefix) (-selinux) -static-libs -sysv-utils" ABI_X86="(64)"
For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following
section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook (architecture is irrelevant):
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:X86/Working/Portage#Blocked_packages
|
Code: | $ emerge -p display-manager-init
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ~] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3
[blocks B ] <=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1 ("<=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2 ("=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
[blocks B ] <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98 ("<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
display-manager-init
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2:0/1.20.10::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
x11-base/xorg-server required by @selected
For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following
section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook (architecture is irrelevant):
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:X86/Working/Portage#Blocked_packages
|
But, if I now try to update, it will go -- but I'm not interested in putting that much in ~amd64. I want to be bog stable.
Code: | $ emerge -uDU @world -p
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ~] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.99 [2.97]
[ebuild U ~] x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1-r1 [1.4.1]
[ebuild N ~] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3
[ebuild U ~] x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r3 [1.20.10-r2]
[blocks b ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2 ("=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r2" is blocking gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3)
|
_________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GDH-gentoo Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2019 Posts: 1699 Location: South America
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, all those packages have to be upgraded in the same emerge command to avoid blockers.
emerge -a1 xinit xorg-server sysvinit after modifying /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords works as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tony0945 Watchman
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 5127 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | ~ $ eix -e xinit
[I] x11-apps/xinit
Available versions: 1.4.1{tbz2} ~1.4.1-r1 {twm}
Installed versions: 1.4.1{tbz2}(06:44:04 PM 03/23/2020)(-twm)
|
When did you last emerge --sync? Your installed packages are out of the tree. I sync'd yesterday.
Emerge --sync, emerge -auvND #world and when all isw stelled, try again for the new ebuild. $5 to your favorite on-line charity says the blockers will be gone. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tony0945 wrote: |
When did you last emerge --sync? |
If you are asking me, I synced this morning at 6 am EST and updated around noon. All four of the packages are ~amd64. Maybe tomorrow. I'm waiting for these things to be stable.
Code: |
$ eix -e xinit
[I] x11-apps/xinit
Available versions: 1.4.1 {twm}
Installed versions: 1.4.1(01:42:06 PM 07/20/2019)(-twm)
Homepage: https://www.x.org/wiki/ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xinit
Description: X Window System initializer |
_________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tony0945 Watchman
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 5127 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
figueroa wrote: | Tony0945 wrote: |
When did you last emerge --sync? |
If you are asking me, ... |
No, milomak, who had the hard blocker because of < xinit-1.4.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9280
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
figueroa wrote: |
Herer is what I put in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords
Code: |
gui-libs/display-manager-init ~amd64
x11-apps/xinit ~amd64
x11-base/xorg-server ~amd64
sys-apps/sysvinit ~amd64
|
...
Code: | $ emerge -1p xorg-server |
...
Code: | $ emerge -p display-manager-init |
|
Didn't exactly this topic come up already in this thread and I told you that you couldn't update 4 packages by giving emerge only one of them to do? Btw news item was giving you the list with version atoms, why didn't you copy that? Its purpose was exactly that you would not unnecessarily get any future ~arch version as update. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asturm wrote: |
Didn't exactly this topic come up already in this thread and I told you that you couldn't update 4 packages by giving emerge only one of them to do? |
Actually, no, not in so many words. (OK, maybe you did, a month or so ago, and that's a lot of time for things to change.)
asturm wrote: |
Btw news item was giving you the list with version atoms, why didn't you copy that? Its purpose was exactly that you would not unnecessarily get any future ~arch version as update. |
The versions of some of the ebuilds in the news item were already out-of-date. I was doing those pretend emerges to probe versions. Since there have been no further announcements, I was waiting for the on or about March 2nd stabilization.
Quote: | The package is now in ~arch and will be available to stable users starting with 2nd March 2021. |
I'm trying to not be caught by surprise. _________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi
Last edited by figueroa on Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9280
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
figueroa wrote: | The versions of some of the ebuilds in the news item were already out-of-date. |
No they're not.
News item provides a copy-pasteable list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Honestly, I had no idea that format would actually work. I thought it was cryptic shorthand:
Code: |
~sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98
~x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1
~x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10
~gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0 |
I've never seen such a thing. Is this documented somewhere? I'm only familiar with the "=exact-ebuild-version ~amd64" format.
What it give me is:
Code: |
$ emerge -uDU @world -p
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ~] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98-r1 [2.97]
[ebuild U ~] x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1-r1 [1.4.1]
[ebuild N ~] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3
[ebuild U ~] x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r3 [1.20.10-r2] |
That's obviously not the exact same versions as I put in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords.
If I use the following format:
Code: |
=gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0 ~amd64
=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1 ~amd64
=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10 ~amd64
=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98 ~amd64
|
I don't get anything.
I've learned something new, though I don't understand how that format, i.e. "~x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1" is supposed to work and actually gives me "[ebuild U ~] x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1-r1 [1.4.1]". I don't see it reading through "man portage" or "man emerge" so feel free to rub my nose in it. _________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9280
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
figueroa wrote: | Code: |
$ emerge -uDU @world -p
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ~] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98-r1 [2.97]
[ebuild U ~] x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1-r1 [1.4.1]
[ebuild N ~] gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3
[ebuild U ~] x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r3 [1.20.10-r2] |
That's obviously not the exact same versions as I put in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords. |
They are the same versions, but they aren't the same revisions. '~' will unmask all future revisions (which are downstream-only modifications) pinned down to that specific version.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Knowledge_Base:Accepting_a_keyword_for_a_single_package#Additional_notes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asturm: Thank you for the clarification, and especially the reference. _________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hu Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 22657
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asturm addressed the way the package atom is written. As an addendum since people seem to be caught by the other side of it: if there are no keywords specified, then there is an implied keyword of ~ARCH, where ARCH is whatever architecture you are on. This makes for a nice shorthand if you want to allow testing from your own architecture, but not bring in testing packages from other architectures. This is useful when working with packages where some versions may be completely unkeyworded for your architecture, but available in testing for other architectures, and you want to wait until someone declares them ready for testing on your architecture. It's also convenient because it makes the news items more portable. The same instructions apply to everyone, regardless of their architecture. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
EDITED 3/24/2021 0947 EDT -- correcting my incorrect assumptions.
I got tired of waiting for this whole transition to become stable for amd64. I added to /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:
Code: |
~sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98
~x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1
~x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10
~gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0
|
did "emerge -uDU @world"
dispatch-conf showed that the settings from xdm were not migrated from xdm to display-manager-init, so I edited the settings (to lightdm).
Then, logged out to the lightdm login prompt, and CTL/ALT/F1 to log in as root and "/etc/init.d/xdm stop" followed by "etc /init.d/display-manager start" went flawlessly.
I'm migrated. Follow me.
The news item IMPLIES this whole process was to be automatic on March 2, so maybe just display-manager-init was to become stable then, but the dependencies did not. It could have been less confusing.
By trial and error (and looking at KEYWORDS in /var/db/repos/gentoo/~) on this date (3/23) for amd64, what's needed is:
Code: |
=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.98-r1 ~amd64
=x11-apps/xinit-1.4.1-r1 ~amd64
=x11-base/xorg-server-1.20.10-r3 ~amd64
=gui-libs/display-manager-init-1.0-r3 ~amd64
|
_________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi
Last edited by figueroa on Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9280
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure what the purpose of this keyword list change is yet again, but gui-libs/display-manager-init is missing in it. Don't rely on trial and error when there is no need for that.
figueroa wrote: | The news item IMPLIES this whole process was to be automatic on March 2 |
Setting dates in news items was never a good idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asturm wrote: | I'm not sure what the purpose of this keyword list change is yet again, but gui-libs/display-manager-init is missing in it. Don't rely on trial and error when there is no need for that. |
You are absolutely right (missing keyword). I shouldn't have done this at the end of my day. I edited my message above.
Yes, I'm being OCD with keyword specificity. I'm pretending I have some control.
asturm wrote: | figueroa wrote: | The news item IMPLIES this whole process was to be automatic on March 2 |
Setting dates in news items was never a good idea. |
_________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wfdawson n00b
Joined: 05 Aug 2010 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm scanning this thread only and may have missed important details, but...
Brand new Gentoo VM instance. Fully synced. Installed Xfce, Slim. Read https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Display_manager about XDM being deprecated. Attempted to install gui-libs/display-manager-init but find there are no stable versions. Added to accept_keywords, only to find blockers. News article or no, this is a fully unacceptable situation. Incidentally, XDM emerges without any of these nonsensical issues.
gui-libs/display-manager-init is clearly not ready to be called "stable" in any sane interpretation of the word. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 9280
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The XDM *package* was never involved in that matter.
display-manager-init still doesn't have stable keywords (at least on major arches), that is correct. But it is entirely possible to emerge it, you just need to read through the news item. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zucca Moderator
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 3701 Location: Rasi, Finland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wfdawson wrote: | Attempted to install gui-libs/display-manager-init but find there are no stable versions. Added to accept_keywords, only to find blockers. | You probably get the blockers because you have mixed keywords then.
wfdawson wrote: | gui-libs/display-manager-init is clearly not ready to be called "stable" in any sane interpretation of the word. | It isn't stable. It has ~* keyword. If there's a mention of it being stable, its wrong. _________________ ..: Zucca :..
My gentoo installs: | init=/sbin/openrc-init
-systemd -logind -elogind seatd |
Quote: | I am NaN! I am a man! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|