View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9824 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 8:47 pm Post subject: (laugh) firefox causing website issues due to version |
|
|
>=www-client/firefox-100 ebuilds wrote: | Code: | *
* Unfortunately Firefox-100.0 breaks compatibility with some sites using
* useragent checks. To temporarily fix this, enter about:config and modify
* network.http.useragent.forceVersion preference to "99".
* Or install an addon to change your useragent.
* See: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/difficulties-opening-or-using-website-firefox-100
* |
|
LOL
Not my/our problem, silly websites that have "Y2K" issues with firefox versions :p
Then again, do we have firefox version bloat? _________________ Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisJumper Advocate
Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 2400 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome eccerr0r,
that's a nice Post. Cause this message and its work around is one of the good one. Yo may laugh about it but that issue was serious on chromeom and Googles Brothers Weeks before.
Right now i think you can ignore it, cause the most important Websites already patched it.
However, the Workaround is for bots or if you like to use Links, wget or youtube-dl to read or watch still old content.
So no its not about firefox only, its about Web pages. ;) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
szatox Advocate
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 3433
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well... The sad thing here is that websites actually check user agent string.
They have no reason to do that. And yet they go out of their way to punish people for straying from the blessed path of chrome, ff and opera. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spanik Veteran
Joined: 12 Dec 2003 Posts: 1003 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2022 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's time programmers learn to write decent check code I think. Wasn't the reason Microsoft went from W8 to W10 because lots of installers checked for "9" and then decided it would have been W9x? Looks very similar to me. _________________ Expert in non-working solutions |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hu Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 22673
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2022 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That was the stated reason for not having a Windows 9, yes.
Asking people to write better check code is a nice idea, but considering the number of sites that were pushed to production with far more serious errors, I think it is unlikely to go anywhere. As szatox noted, the correct check here is not to check the user agent at all. For those rare sites that actually need to render differently, they should be directly testing the feature which controls their decision, instead of using a version lookup that assumes Firefox >= X works and Firefox < X fails. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gorg86 Guru
Joined: 20 May 2011 Posts: 315
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2022 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You noticed that just now? That message has been there for a long time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|