View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gentoopc Guru
Joined: 25 Dec 2017 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:23 am Post subject: merging servers into one |
|
|
Hello forum. Tell me, for example, there are three servers that I rented. Each of them has a 96-core CPU. Is there any software that will allow me to combine these servers into one and work with it as a 288-core server? Is it possible to install any desktop operating system on such a 288-core server? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loravis n00b
Joined: 29 Dec 2024 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think that's possible, at least I wasn't able to find something like this on the internet. What would you need this kind of setup for? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alamahant Advocate
Joined: 23 Mar 2019 Posts: 3939
|
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try Openstack and create your own personal cloud.
It will create a pool of resources and then you can create a tenant or VM with all these resources.
Or maybe VmWare has some solution for you.You have to check it out. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Banana Moderator
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 1839 Location: Germany
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pingtoo Veteran
Joined: 10 Sep 2021 Posts: 1394 Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:45 am Post subject: Re: merging servers into one |
|
|
Gentoopc wrote: | Hello forum. Tell me, for example, there are three servers that I rented. Each of them has a 96-core CPU. Is there any software that will allow me to combine these servers into one and work with it as a 288-core server? Is it possible to install any desktop operating system on such a 288-core server? |
Yes, this is will know, it is know as Distributed Computing. It is not one software, it is usually several software combined to make it work. Please see the Wikipedia reference I linked in previous sentence. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ralphred l33t
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 701
|
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only thing I've come across that did this was a pre-ESXi version of VMWare, it was very niche, the overhead was ridiculous (as was the infrastructure for it), and whilst it did what you are suggesting it's goal was uncommonly high "HA".
The paradigm has inverted since then, now we have promox and ceph et al running/shifting a bunch of "small" containers amongst "large" machines, instead of a bunch of "small" machines under a "large" hypervisor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|