View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
neenee Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 1786
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
here are mirrors for the files (bsstephs host was unreachable
early this morning (european morning), so i decided to mirror):
main patch
small fix
*update*
thanks to ejohnson (from #love-sources), there is now an ebuild
and a love-sources patch which includes the fix (for packet writing
and the loopback device):
patch (fix included)
ebuild for this version
Last edited by neenee on Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asimon l33t
Joined: 27 Jun 2002 Posts: 979 Location: Germany, Old Europe
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some nitpicking:
The love-source ebuilds are not part of Gentoo, they are not in Portage, and as far as we can see this won't change anytime soon.
Thus I just wonder why every love-sources ebuild is copyrighted by Gentoo Technologies, Inc.? Just lazy cut&past? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ejohnson Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 20 Jan 2004 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Love does use the ebuild system, so I believe the mention of Gentoo Technologies, Inc. stems from that. From now on any of my ebuilds will be in accordance with what steel300 deams official
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
discomfitor l33t
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 927 Location: None
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Great job bssteph! _________________ There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evermind Guru
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
teilo wrote: | Using the new radeonfb driver:
Code: | CC drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.o
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c: In function `radeonfb_pci_register':
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c:2286: error: too few arguments to function `register_framebuffer'
make[3]: *** [drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/video/aty] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/video] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2 |
|
look here that worked for me on 2.6.4-rc1
maybe here too - but I haven´t tested
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=142313&highlight=radeon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobDylan Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Dec 2003 Posts: 135 Location: On The Road
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Where does the fb_sysfs_udev.patch.bz2 come from ?
Is it possible to download this patch separately or to extract it from the love patch ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bssteph l33t
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 Posts: 652 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry about the server. I don't know what happened but all the patches seem to be up now (again), so you can fetch from there again (or use one of our kindly mirrors).
I glanced at the VM patches but decided against those for now, just because as you can see I have my hands full with all the driver problems introduced in vanilla and mm.
A heads up, there are patches for missing symbols on LKML for DVB, ext3 journaled quota, and wavefront. If you need such patches find your favorite archive.
nepenthe:
Apply the fixes patch.
evermind and teilo:
Sorry I missed the radeonfb fix. Looks like a number of other framebuffer devices need the fix too. If anyone has the "too few arguments to function `register_framebuffer'" error, edit the file specified, go to line number, and add ", NULL" to the function so it looks something like this:
Code: | register_framebuffer(info, NULL) |
As we can see there are a bunch of problems that seem to be out of my control. I may release a little-changed love2 that applies all these fixes but I haven't decided yet.
Next release will include the updated AMD76x Power Management for SMP patch, whenever that next release occurs.
Reiser4 + mm is messy. Hoping namesys releases a patch so I don't have to hack away.
Please make other driver requests here so I don't miss them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
teilo Apprentice
Joined: 20 Jun 2003 Posts: 276 Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. That fixed it for me. Thank you. _________________ Teilo who is called Teilo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fire-Reiher n00b
Joined: 20 Dec 2002 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
acerhk fails when using SMP, here are the messages:
Code: |
CC [M] drivers/acerhk/acerhk.o
In file included from include/asm/smp.h:18,
from include/linux/smp.h:17,
from include/linux/sched.h:23,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/mpspec.h:6:25: mach_mpspec.h: No such file or directory
In file included from include/asm/smp.h:18,
from include/linux/smp.h:17,
from include/linux/sched.h:23,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:9: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:10: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:19: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: conflicting types for `mp_bus_id_to_type'
include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: previous declaration of `mp_bus_id_to_type'
include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: conflicting types for `mp_bus_id_to_pci_bus'
include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: previous declaration of `mp_bus_id_to_pci_bus'
include/asm/mpspec.h:50: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a function)
In file included from include/asm/smp.h:20,
from include/linux/smp.h:17,
from include/linux/sched.h:23,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/io_apic.h:160: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/io_apic.h:160: error: conflicting types for `mp_irqs'
include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: previous declaration of `mp_irqs'
In file included from include/linux/smp.h:17,
from include/linux/sched.h:23,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/smp.h:71:26: mach_apicdef.h: No such file or directory
In file included from include/linux/smp.h:17,
from include/linux/sched.h:23,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/smp.h: In function `hard_smp_processor_id':
include/asm/smp.h:75: warning: implicit declaration of function `GET_APIC_ID'
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:52:1: warning: "MODULE_VERSION" redefined
In file included from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/linux/module.h:146:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c: At top level:
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:1624: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS'
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:1624: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:322: warning: `pbutton_fct' defined but not used
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:350: warning: `wbutton_fct_1' defined but not used
make[2]: *** [drivers/acerhk/acerhk.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/acerhk] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ed0n l33t
Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 638 Location: Prishtine/Kosove
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
working good here . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chrisyu Apprentice
Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 207 Location: China
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, It works. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daagar Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Info on the au8820 patch was requested: During the kernel build I get the following:
Code: |
sound/built-in.o(.init.text+0x20ea): In function `snd_vortex_new_pcm':
: undefined reference to `snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'
|
I also get warnings while compiling au8820_pcm.c at line 406 saying 'implicit declaration of snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'.
This will occur if I compile as a module as well...
For what it is woth, the au8820 stuff works fine in kernel 2.4 with alsa v1.0.3 installed separately (not in the kernel). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
charlieg Advocate
Joined: 30 Jul 2002 Posts: 2149 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Working well here! _________________ Want Free games?
Free Gamer - open source games list & commentary
Open source web-enabled rich UI platform: Vexi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ejohnson Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 20 Jan 2004 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Daagar wrote: | Info on the au8820 patch was requested: During the kernel build I get the following:
Code: |
sound/built-in.o(.init.text+0x20ea): In function `snd_vortex_new_pcm':
: undefined reference to `snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'
|
I also get warnings while compiling au8820_pcm.c at line 406 saying 'implicit declaration of snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'.
This will occur if I compile as a module as well...
For what it is woth, the au8820 stuff works fine in kernel 2.4 with alsa v1.0.3 installed separately (not in the kernel). |
I don't think that patched applied cleanly either. I'll check it out in the mean time and if I can find the solution I'll email you the patch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wikt n00b
Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
works fine here I compiled Love src the first time, all went fine
gj guys! _________________ # emerge life
emerge: there are no masked or unmasked ebuilds to satisfy "life". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chefakito n00b
Joined: 22 Apr 2003 Posts: 38 Location: Richmond, BC, CAN
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
After a few initial issues with compilation and a few panic moments with the system crashing (can't seem to make oldconfig from an earlier love kernel), we finally have a working linux-2.6.4-love1 kernel.
nothing that a make mrproper can't fix. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bssteph l33t
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 Posts: 652 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ejohnson wrote: | Daagar wrote: | Info on the au8820 patch was requested: During the kernel build I get the following:
Code: |
sound/built-in.o(.init.text+0x20ea): In function `snd_vortex_new_pcm':
: undefined reference to `snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'
|
I also get warnings while compiling au8820_pcm.c at line 406 saying 'implicit declaration of snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'.
This will occur if I compile as a module as well...
For what it is woth, the au8820 stuff works fine in kernel 2.4 with alsa v1.0.3 installed separately (not in the kernel). |
I don't think that patched applied cleanly either. I'll check it out in the mean time and if I can find the solution I'll email you the patch |
Keep me informed... I looked at that (admittedly, a bit late at night) and the most I can tell you now is that the function seems to have disappeared somewhere between 2.6.4-rc1-love3 and 2.6.4-rc2-love1. Sorry I can't look more, I'm in lecture and my prof is giving me glances. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daagar Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not a problem at all! It was just an FYI, since I happen to have an au8820 and was compiling love-sources :) That's probably enough info for me to fix it myself if I have the time. Failing that, I'm willing to test anyone that makes a patch. Aren't I so helpful? ;) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bssteph l33t
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 Posts: 652 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No problem, sounds good.
For those having oopses with SCSI-like devices when you remove them (USB thumb drives, etc) check out this thread on linux-scsi:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=107915633404247&w=2
Like I said in the post, I doubt that's the "right" fix, but for those that find it critical it does stop the oops. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ejohnson Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 20 Jan 2004 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bssteph,
There was a one line warning thrown up during the patching. Its fairly easy to see, infact its the last element to be shown when patching the love1 patch.
I looked into it when it happened the first time, but it appears not to be a failed hunk, hence no .rej file, but it does appear to be a warning. I'll give it some more time after work. Thanks for pointing it out Daagar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uglyb0b Apprentice
Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No ebuild?! But bssteph, I'm lazy! Oh well, not like I'm going to go out and write one. Cheers. _________________ Blog.
Linux geek and Mac whore. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bssteph l33t
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 Posts: 652 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ejohnson wrote: | bssteph,
There was a one line warning thrown up during the patching. Its fairly easy to see, infact its the last element to be shown when patching the love1 patch.
I looked into it when it happened the first time, but it appears not to be a failed hunk, hence no .rej file, but it does appear to be a warning. I'll give it some more time after work. Thanks for pointing it out Daagar |
Did you use an ebuild to get the vanilla or mm? They both change the top level Makefile ever so slightly and that could cause adding the EXTRAVERSION to break. That'd also explain the fact that there's no .rej file, the ebuild moves the original Makefile out of the way to Makefile.orig |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Surye n00b
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uglyb0b wrote: | No ebuild?! But bssteph, I'm lazy! Oh well, not like I'm going to go out and write one. Cheers. |
Read the whole thread =P |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uglyb0b Apprentice
Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm. I am pretty damn ignorant. _________________ Blog.
Linux geek and Mac whore. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neenee Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 1786
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it's a phase |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|