Ok What's the DEAL!!! XFS vs. ReiserFS

RedDawn

I need to someone to please clear something up for me! Which is Faster or Better. XFS filesystems OR Reiserfs Filesystems............yeah yeah yeah i know that there are topics out there staing that XFS is WAY WAY faster then Reiser!! but to myself REISERFS WAS WAY WAY FASTER!!! XFS is slow as crap on my comp why? Things talke a while longer to load at stuff? Why!!

2) Sencond Question)

I keep on getting modprobe errors during bootime saying that i could not load my soundcard modules or my mouse YET THEY Still work?? is there a way i can take them off during boottime!! thanks

randoguy · Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:31 pm Post subject:

Apparently reiserfs is faster for heaps of small files and xfs is faster for a smaller number of large files.
Personally I use reiserfs only coz thats what the x86 setup guide said and i havnt bothered to change

Peaceable Frood · Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:11 am Post subject:

XFS is better for large files, Reiser is better for smaller files. That's not saying either can't do both.
_________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we, they never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." George W. Bush

JjcampNR · Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:26 am Post subject:

As for the modules loading that you don't need, try looking in