View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
krunk Guru
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Posts: 316
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
blueworm wrote: | Admiral LSD` wrote: | I don't think something as trivial as this is worth giving up what is arguably the best chipset the Athlon has ever seen in favour of shite from Via or Creative... |
So far everything I have read about nforce3, pretty much makes believe it is in the shadow of kt800... |
Sometimes VIA pulls ahead of the competition when it comes to performance, but as far as real life application it's barely noticeable between the top 3 mobos or so. In addition, if you've owned more than a couple VIA products you'd know they are hardly stable.
I've seen about 3 or 4 VIA chipsets personally and every one of them were extremely buggy compared to others (I'm comparing to nforce2 and amd761<-----damn good )
I'd take the stability over the slight performance gain anyday. _________________ G4 1ghz iBook
PowerMac G3 (B&W) [Powered by Gentoo and Gentoo alone ]
Dual G5
iPod 3rd generation |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jaska Bodhisattva
Joined: 06 Jun 2003 Posts: 725 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
The current MSI motherboard I have has kt400 via chipset. Despite the bad rep from the previous chipsets kt400 has been good, no unexplainable crashes or anything of that sort. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alsh n00b
Joined: 21 Apr 2003 Posts: 60 Location: Glen Allen, VA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jaska wrote: | The current MSI motherboard I have has kt400 via chipset. Despite the bad rep from the previous chipsets kt400 has been good, no unexplainable crashes or anything of that sort. |
Yes I have the same chipset on an Asus board. I have never had any problems with it, or any other via chipset I have used for that matter. Not knocking nforce, just saying via has always worked great for me. I never bothered with nforce becuase I don't use integrated sound or video, and usually the good cheap boards without that (integrated vid/sound) are VIA chipset based. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TenPin Guru
Joined: 26 Aug 2002 Posts: 500 Location: Kansas City
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have an nforce but I mailed them anyway :)
Don't knock VIA. KT133 rock solid here for about 3 years ;) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cereal-chiller Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 19 Jul 2003 Posts: 78 Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TenPin wrote: | I don't have an nforce but I mailed them anyway
|
That's the spirit!! _________________ The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what you want!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
madmanuk n00b
Joined: 01 Nov 2003 Posts: 63 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have 2 nForce 2 boards so I emailed them twice. _________________ -madmanuk- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etnoy Apprentice
Joined: 29 Aug 2003 Posts: 255 Location: Västerås, Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2003 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
madmanuk wrote: | I have 2 nForce 2 boards so I emailed them twice. |
That _is_ the spirit! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jay l33t
Joined: 08 May 2002 Posts: 980
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2003 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have only a nforce 1 motherboad. Before I'm pestering them, I want to know what this thing can do? And is there anything missing in the sound driver?
Edit:
I googled for the specs but I cannot make sense out of this:
http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data_Sheets/34962224AD1885_0.pdf _________________ Do you want your posessions identified? [ynq] (n) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Admiral LSD Guru
Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 522 Location: Northam, W.A., Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
nVidia have a Tech Brief for the APU on their site:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/LO_20020712_6735.html (I
along with a short description of what the thing can do:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/feature_soundstorm.html
Neither are the most objective documents in the world but should still provide enough information to be useful. The nForce APU has remained virtually unchanged since the MCP-X (Xbox) so as long as your nForce1 board has an MCP-D (Regular MCP, both 1 and 2, users needn't apply as without an APU they won't benefit any from nVidia, or anyone else, releasing a decent APU driver) then you'll benefit. _________________ Wasurenaide...
...watashi ga iru koto o.
Itsudatte soba ni iru yo.
Registered Linux user #319839 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jay l33t
Joined: 08 May 2002 Posts: 980
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you very much for the links. Those enlightened me a bit.
Only one question left: What is the difference between a MCP-D and Soundstorm?
So far I have checked the mainboard specs (it's a MSI K7n415Pro) and it says it has a MCP-D with SPDIF output. So it is likely that it contains a HW Dolby encoder, right? This means I'm one of those that will benefit from a proper driver allowing me to do hardware mixing and AC3 passthrough.
The key question is however: Will they support Linux when they plan to ship their new boards no longer with Soundstorm? Read here:
http://www.nforcershq.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1038 _________________ Do you want your posessions identified? [ynq] (n) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Admiral LSD Guru
Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 522 Location: Northam, W.A., Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SoundStorm is just a certification like Intel's Centrino. It doesn't refer to a specific piece of hardware as such. It refers to nForce2 motherboards that feature the MCP-T, have at least SPDIF output ready to go out of the box and enough analogue audio connectors to have discrete 5.1 channel output, Line-In and Mic-In without doubling up. The actual APU itself, which is at the core of being eligible for SS certification, has remained virtually unchanged from the MCP-X to the MCP-T encompassing your MCP-D.
Any board that has an MCP-T, with the exception of the Chaintech 7NJS (which has an MCP-T but stupidly disables the APU replacing it instead with an external CMI sound chip which is nowhere near as capable as the APU), is technically SoundStorm capable but unless it meets the nVidia requirements it can't officially carry the SoundStorm tag. My 8RDA+ is like this, it has an MCP-T and the facility for SPDIF but since it doesn't include the SPDIF bracket in the box (it is available as an option though) and doubles up the Mic-In and Line-In inputs it can't officially be called a "SoundStorm" board even though it's audio hardware is every bit as capable as a "true" SS board such as say, the A7N8X Deluxe (which in may ways is an inferior board to the 8RDA+).
As long as you have the APU then you'll benefit from any decent driver that gets released. _________________ Wasurenaide...
...watashi ga iru koto o.
Itsudatte soba ni iru yo.
Registered Linux user #319839 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jay l33t
Joined: 08 May 2002 Posts: 980
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sent a mail to the nforce guys, since I'm planning to upgrade soon and want to have decent drivers then. _________________ Do you want your posessions identified? [ynq] (n) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SavageMindz Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 Posts: 87 Location: The bit of hell that has frozen over.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sent |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flazz Guru
Joined: 22 Nov 2003 Posts: 496 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i just sent mine.
maybe we are emailing the wrong ppl. maybe we should email some sales ppl or some managers or something; i.e., someone who cares about sales. it might take some work to find an email addy, but i think its a better solution than bugging engineers who take the philosophy,"I'm not getting paid to make it work in linux." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
femtotech n00b
Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 4:55 am Post subject: done |
|
|
Sent
Hello-
I am the owner of an nVidia nForce2 chipset motherboard with Soundstorm Audio. I would like to request that nVidia develop a fully functional sound driver for Linux including hardware mixing. If this cannot be done at nVidia, then the necessary information for the open-source community to do so should be released.
I am a hardware and Linux enthusiast and have been a strong supporter of nVidia hardware for many years. I upgrade my motherboard and videocard 1-2 times per year and would like to keep purchasing nVidia products, but issues like poor Linux driver support will force me to investigate other product lines.
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FuR n00b
Joined: 04 Mar 2003 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sent them one as well.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HeadHolio Guru
Joined: 10 Aug 2002 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2003 3:28 am Post subject: Might be kind of late but.... |
|
|
This thread is kind of old, but I sent a request anyways. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
krunk Guru
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Posts: 316
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2003 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
The thread will only be too old when hardware mixing is here
Thanks a lot. _________________ G4 1ghz iBook
PowerMac G3 (B&W) [Powered by Gentoo and Gentoo alone ]
Dual G5
iPod 3rd generation |
|
Back to top |
|
|
piggie Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Jan 2003 Posts: 113 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sent.
Quote: |
Hello,
I recently bought a ShuttleX with your NForce2 chipset onboard.
The ShuttleX units are a great idea, allowing a very powerful yet small
platform.
Unfortunately, I have had to remove my TV tuner card from the machine to
replace it with my old SBLive because these units only have one PCI slot.
The NForce2 sound is basically unusable for any normal user in Linux.
Because we have no hardware mixing, we cannot do more than one thing at once
without it being a major headache.
For instance, if arts is using the sound device in the window manager, games
such as Quake3 will have no sound.
At this stage, I am advising anyone that runs Linux not to buy a product with
an NForce2 chipset yet.
What we need as linux users, is a fully featured driver either released by
Nvidia, or produced by the Linux community from developer information
supplied by Nvidia.
Your support for your video products in Linux of late has been outstanding,
and we appreciate that. Heres hoping that full support for your NForce
products also comes sooner rather than later.
Kind Regards
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
krunk Guru
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Posts: 316
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well said, piggy. _________________ G4 1ghz iBook
PowerMac G3 (B&W) [Powered by Gentoo and Gentoo alone ]
Dual G5
iPod 3rd generation |
|
Back to top |
|
|
holymacaroni n00b
Joined: 06 Mar 2003 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i sent them an email, but i bit the bullet yesterday and just grabbed a SBLive! card for the time being. sigh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MighMoS Guru
Joined: 24 Apr 2003 Posts: 416 Location: @ ~
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
email sent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RK n00b
Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 8 Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2003 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the topic of ALSA drivers, how many people are aware that the open source ALSA driver recommended for nForce2 is nothing more than a standard AC 97 driver which does all the signals processing in software, bypassing the Nvidia's embedded DSP? Effectively, you might as well buy a cheap VIA or SiS based MB with just an AC 97 codec, since you aren't getting anything out of Nvidia's chip soundwise unless you are running Windows. nForce2, of course, also uses the codec, but the important difference is that all the number crunching is done by the embedded DSP on the southbridge and not by the CPU.
If Nvidia absolutely must release a closed source driver, they should at least design so that the binary-only code is restricted to one part of the driver, and that the kernel/ALSA interface (since releasing an OSS driver now would be pointless) is open. That way it will be possible to at least compile the driver to a kernel of our choice, rather than be restricted to those kernel to which Nvidia's driver team has compiled the drivers, and, if necessary, adapt it to newer (that is, development) kernels as well as newer versions of ALSA if Nvidia isn't in a particular hurry to update the driver or decides to abandon support for it entirely. That way, Nvidia gets to keep their oh-so-secret intellectual property and we get at least a reasonable compromise as far as flexibility is concerned. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HeadHolio Guru
Joined: 10 Aug 2002 Posts: 445
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RK n00b
Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 8 Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I said before, this stuff is only using the codec. The DSP is not documented by Nvidia, and reverse engineering the Windows drivers would be a hell of a lot of work. Support for S/PDIF is nothing special, Nvidia itself implemented that in the nvaudio driver, the type of output is controlled by the codec and not by the DSP. However, you cannot get, for example, hardware mixing from a codec, nor can you get any kind of 3D sound acceleration, basically the codec is just a DAC and an ADC, as well as an S/PDIF interface, if it supports that, which, in the case of nForce2, with which almost all MB manufacturers use a Realtek ALC-650 codec, it does. On standard AC 97 onboard soundsystems (such as used by the MCP, as opposed to the MCP-T) it is the drivers, either in Windows or in any other operating system, that do the signals processing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|