Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
kdesu dolphin as root not possible [SOLVED-again]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours
View posts from last 7 days

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 3456
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2017 3:55 pm    Post subject: kdesu dolphin as root not possible [SOLVED-again] Reply with quote

With the 17.04 updates, with kdesu dolphin, I now get this: "Executing Dolphin as root is not possible."

As a 15 year kde user of Dolphin (as my main go to DE and file manager), and as I constantly use Dolphin as root for various things ever day, this is insane, ridiculous, infuriating, you name it. Are they trying to force users to move to xfce or gnome? Dolphin is the best by far file manager, but without root usage, in my case it becomes almost usless.

I looked at https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2017/02/editing-files-as-root and read all the arguments pro/con, and am still disgusted. If I want to use sudo variations for every file or folder I want to work with, I'd use Mint or Ububtu.


On the huge Suse thread on the subject, https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/524150-Executing-Dolphin-as-root-is-not-possible/page13 on page 13 a poster says:
Quote:
I'd like to note that this check for running dolphin as root has been *removed* (i.e. patched out) in openSUSE's package meanwhile.

That means that it is possible to run dolphin as root again if using KDE:Applications, and it will continue to be possible in Leap 42.3 and Tumbleweed (even after 17.04.0 hits the repos).

Whatever they did on Suse to get normal kdesu functional, I urge the Gentoo kde people to please do the same. As it is, I'm now relegated to using a root Thunar session, which while it works OK, I much prefer Dolphin. In fact, so much, that I'd consider it mandatory for my main Linux distro. We really need this kdesu root option functionality back in Gentoo.

I'm stuck with a quandary: My beloved Gentoo without kdesu and having to use Thunar or even full Xfce4 DE, or openSuse with a fully normal kdesu dolphin kde implementation, and lose all the great and loved gentoo features.

All because a kde dev decides they want to remove the kde kdesu option??? :roll: I get the pro arguments, but removing the convienence of kdesu function for whatever reason(s) is simply unjustified. Nobody is forced to use kdesu, so what's the point of not having it available if users want to employ it? The so-called security concerns don't really convince me, or others currently posting on various threads.

Hopefully, kde devs will realize this is a bad idea, and will drive kde users to other solutions, no matter how much they like Dolphin, Kate, et al. To inform a user that they can no longer edit, copy/paste, etc. any file or folder they wisn in the kde DE running dolphin as root, is preposterous. 8O
_________________
Main box- AsRock x370 Gaming K4
Ryzen 7 3700x, 3.6GHz, 16GB GSkill Flare DDR4 3200mhz
Samsung SATA 1000GB, Radeon HD R7 350 2GB DDR5
OpenRC Gentoo ~amd64 plasma, glibc-2.40-r5, gcc-14
kernel-6.12.3 USE=experimental python3_12.7-final-0


Last edited by wrc1944 on Fri Aug 10, 2018 1:52 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 3456
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2017 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looked in the full changelog, https://www.kde.org/announcements/fulllog_applications.php?version=17.04.0#dolphin and here's the specific commit that caused this: https://cgit.kde.org/dolphin.git/commit/?id=0bdd8e0b0516555c6233fdc7901e9b417cf89791

Code:
author   Emmanuel Pescosta <emmanuelpescosta099@gmail.com>   2017-02-19 01:32:48 (GMT)
committer   Emmanuel Pescosta <emmanuelpescosta099@gmail.com>   2017-02-19 01:39:52 (GMT)
commit   0bdd8e0b0516555c6233fdc7901e9b417cf89791 (patch)
tree   150c3e3f9dd206184fa079418ac9acd4ff6ffd31
parent   bea831da5242373d6c60a2b542e535d2721051c0 (diff)
Disallow executing Dolphin as root on Linux
Basically a copy of commit kate/9adcebd3c2e476c8a32e9b455cc99f46b0e12a7e which was
written by Martin Grässlin.
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--   src/main.cpp   13   
     
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
index acba8da..789a529 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -35,8 +35,21 @@
 #include <KLocalizedString>
 #include <Kdelibs4ConfigMigrator>
 
+#ifndef Q_OS_WIN
+#include <unistd.h>
+#endif
+#include <iostream>
+
 extern "C" Q_DECL_EXPORT int kdemain(int argc, char **argv)
 {
+#ifndef Q_OS_WIN
+    // Check whether we are running as root
+    if (getuid() == 0) {
+        std::cout << "Executing Dolphin as root is not possible." << std::endl;
+        return EXIT_FAILURE;
+    }
+#endif
+
     QApplication app(argc, argv);
     app.setAttribute(Qt::AA_UseHighDpiPixmaps, true);
     app.setWindowIcon(QIcon::fromTheme(QStringLiteral("system-file-manager"), app.windowIcon()));


Is there anything preventing just removing this patch from the source code, and rebuilding dolphin, or is it more complex than that?
Sure wish Gentoo kde devs will consider getting rid of this problem.

A few sample comments from the blog:
Quote:
The sudoedit workflow you suggest to use is still a lot less user-friendly than kdesu kwrite. You have to start the editor from the command line for each file, whereas you can open as many files as you want from kdesu kwrite, or even at the same time with kdesu kate. The kdesu version can also be made into a menu entry if it is needed often. Using sudoedit forces you to use the command line.

------------------

I hope this change isn’t just blindly accepted due to your name in the KDE community. I also hope this crusade against stopping users using kdesu does not go any further as it is useful for many applications. People use their computers to primariy get stuff done rather than fart about on a command line out of a misplaced worry about non-existent theoretical attacks from malware which most sensible computer users just are not affected by.
-------------------------
I find this absolutely unacceptable, and hope distributions will patch this nonsense out. kdesu kwrite is a very common operation (I do it regularly), and blindly refusing to run as root also breaks running the application in root sessions. And people will just use something else, just as Krusader’s easily accessible root mode, or a non-KDE editor.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the general topic, the greater threat is not root access, rather rogue applications having access to all a user’s personal data as that user. That requires an entire new architecture to fix, not simply getting in a user’s way like these temporary fixes. Therefore, you might as well not turn on your computer at all since your private data is vulnerable since you are using all those horrible unintuitive gui apps /sarcasm

------------------------------
What if I am using Dolphin in super-user mode and click on a text file to edit? This would mean I would then have to inconveniently open the command line and then type a cumbersome command just to edit the file.
---------------------------

“Starting GUI applications as root is extremely insecure”
It’s only extremely insecure if you already have malware running on your system, which is, as everyone already knows, extremely insecure.
---------------------------
Meanwhile: don’t hinder people’s lives, people who care about security don’t have malware, and shouldn’t be “awarded” with worse command-line editors when KDE software is better.
---------------------------------
Perhaps you edit a few files as root, but people who need to edit a lot… won’t be using sudoedit, they will use gedit or similar, and will stop using Kate. At least give them KDE options.
-----------------------------------
Exactly. Especially as nothing is more frustrating than forgetting that you need to edit file as root, editting it as user and getting the error that you cannot write to it after pressing Ctrl+S.
---------------------------------
All this will accomplish is that people will switch to using a GUI editor the *can* start as root.

I understand your reasoning, but this is the wrong way to go about it.

_________________
Main box- AsRock x370 Gaming K4
Ryzen 7 3700x, 3.6GHz, 16GB GSkill Flare DDR4 3200mhz
Samsung SATA 1000GB, Radeon HD R7 350 2GB DDR5
OpenRC Gentoo ~amd64 plasma, glibc-2.40-r5, gcc-14
kernel-6.12.3 USE=experimental python3_12.7-final-0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BobWya
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 228
Location: Cambridge,UK

PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wrc1944 wrote:
...
Is there anything preventing just removing this patch from the source code, and rebuilding dolphin, or is it more complex than that?
Sure wish Gentoo kde devs will consider getting rid of this problem.
...


I've already got anti- anti-root user patches in place for kate and kwrite... It's much easier to do it that way... Just carry these over from release to release... 8)

This test (for running as root) is dumb - the sort of code I'd write! The correct way to do it (as was stated in Martin's blog comments) is to elevate to root (using policykit) when you need to actually save (write to) the file - in the case of the KDE text editors.

These new restrictions are really annoying and get in the way of my workflow... Thankfull, on Gentoo, it's easy to blast them to /dev/null !!

Bob
_________________
system: G751JT (ASUS-NotebookSKU); processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz; memory: 32GiB System Memory; display: GM204M [GeForce GTX 970M]; disk: 2048GB Samsung SSD 850;BD-CMB UJ172 S;1024GB Samsung SSD 850
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22853

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do not use the affected programs, so their quirk does not affect me. That said, I wanted to point out that this is actually deficient in another way. With the right invocation of a user namespace, anyone can convince an unprivileged program that it is running as root, yet the namespace rules will (barring security bugs) prevent it from being any more dangerous than the invoking user. Thus, affected programs will needlessly fail to work in a user namespace.
Code:
$ /usr/bin/unshare --user --map-root-user -- /usr/bin/id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
$ /usr/bin/unshare --user --map-root-user -- /bin/head -n1 /etc/shadow | wc
/bin/head: cannot open '/etc/shadow' for reading: Permission denied
# /usr/bin/unshare --user -- /usr/bin/id
uid=65534(nobody) gid=65534(nobody) groups=65534(nobody)
# /usr/bin/unshare --user -- /bin/head -n1 /etc/shadow | wc
      1       1     128
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ant P.
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 3:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Good catch, I came here to point out exactly the same thing. This will make sandboxing insecure KDE apps via unprivileged containers (e.g. using firejail) a huge pain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 3456
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks to all for the feedback. :)

From my perspective, all of this is just too much trouble, and a bad move by kde, needlessly making my usage flow less than ideal, to put it mildly.

For me, there are many times I simply use "kdesu dolphin" (have alias kdol in .bashrc) and type in my root password, and can then conveniently do anything I wish as root in the nice dolphin GUI.

I work with stand-alone desktop systems, not on any network, and really have no security concerns that have caused me any problem in 15+ years of running linux systems. For me, running as root when needed is no big deal, and perfectly safe in most situations.

Of course I don't run anything as root while on the internet. If I find removing the "disable dolphin kdesu" patch is too much trouble, I'll be forced to stop using dolphin except for my "user" periods of usage.

I just updated my Kaos Linux (kde centric distro) partition to 17.04, and kdesu dolphin still functions as root as it has for many years. Don't personally know openSuse does, but users have said that is the case.

My current work-around is just installing pcmanfm-qt that has an "as root" option under the menu bar "tool" item. type in your root password, and a new pcmanfm root window pops up, looking pretty much as dolphin appears, with a few less features. I could almost live with that, however one little minor bug occurs where pcmanfm refuses to respect the "show hidden files" option when you restart pcmanfm. (apparently the "as root" option only works if you have gksu installed).

It just irks me that kde thinks they should now prevent a user from lauching dolphin in a root session if they so choose.

How about an optional Gentoo USE flag (with approriate warnings) for enabling kdesu so users can opt in for the very useful "kdesu dolphin" again?
_________________
Main box- AsRock x370 Gaming K4
Ryzen 7 3700x, 3.6GHz, 16GB GSkill Flare DDR4 3200mhz
Samsung SATA 1000GB, Radeon HD R7 350 2GB DDR5
OpenRC Gentoo ~amd64 plasma, glibc-2.40-r5, gcc-14
kernel-6.12.3 USE=experimental python3_12.7-final-0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nsane457
n00b
n00b


Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:19 am    Post subject: Reverse patches Reply with quote

For anyone who needs patches to reenable execution as root for kate, kwrite, and dolphin, here you go:

kwrite-17.04.0-allow-root.patch
kate-17.04.0-allow-root.patch
dolphin-17.04.0-allow-root.patch
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22853

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ant P. wrote:
This will make sandboxing insecure KDE apps via unprivileged containers (e.g. using firejail) a huge pain.
It depends on the container. A user namespace can make getuid lie in either direction, telling privileged programs they are unprivileged or telling unprivileged programs that they are privileged. Although /usr/bin/unshare lacks the command line options to do so, you can even tell an unprivileged user that it is a different unprivileged user (or is the same UID, which you might do if you only created the user namespace so that you could create other namespaces (mount, pid, network, etc.)).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peakeyed
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 60

PostPosted: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:52 pm    Post subject: thanks Reply with quote

Nsane457, Thank you for the patches.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, good work Nsane.

Glad to hear other distros aren't going along with this nonsense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
papu
l33t
l33t


Joined: 25 Jan 2008
Posts: 735
Location: Sota algun pi o alzina...

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Reverse patches Reply with quote

Nsane457 wrote:
For anyone who needs patches to reenable execution as root for kate, kwrite, and dolphin, here you go:

kwrite-17.04.0-allow-root.patch
kate-17.04.0-allow-root.patch
dolphin-17.04.0-allow-root.patch


i don't know how to use this patch, i am interested on dolphin , but thanks at all :oops:
_________________
~amd64 & openrc --cpu 7700 non-x --ram 2x16GB --gpu RX 6600
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dalek
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 1353
Location: Mississippi USA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Reverse patches Reply with quote

papu wrote:

i don't know how to use this patch, i am interested on dolphin , but thanks at all :oops:


This should help. Note the path and the contents of the text file. Just reproduce it.

Code:
root@fireball / # cat /etc/portage/patches/kde-apps/dolphin/allow-root.patch
diff -Naur dolphin-17.04.0.old/src/main.cpp dolphin-17.04.0/src/main.cpp
--- dolphin-17.04.0.old/src/main.cpp    2017-04-25 02:44:57.440557635 -0400
+++ dolphin-17.04.0/src/main.cpp        2017-04-25 02:45:22.535328410 -0400
@@ -35,21 +35,8 @@
 #include <KLocalizedString>
 #include <Kdelibs4ConfigMigrator>
 
-#ifndef Q_OS_WIN
-#include <unistd.h>
-#endif
-#include <iostream>
-
 extern "C" Q_DECL_EXPORT int kdemain(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-#ifndef Q_OS_WIN
-    // Check whether we are running as root
-    if (getuid() == 0) {
-        std::cout << "Executing Dolphin as root is not possible." << std::endl;
-        return EXIT_FAILURE;
-    }
-#endif
-
     QApplication app(argc, argv);
     app.setAttribute(Qt::AA_UseHighDpiPixmaps, true);
     app.setWindowIcon(QIcon::fromTheme(QStringLiteral("system-file-manager"), app.windowIcon()));
root@fireball / #


Once you reproduce that, just re-emerge it. It worked here.
_________________
My rig: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P mobo, AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core CPU, ZALMAN CNPS10X Performa CPU cooler,
G.SKILL 32GB DDR3 PC3 12800 Memory Nvidia GTX-650 video card LG W2253 Monitor
60TBs of hard drive space using LVM
Cooler Master HAF-932 Case
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BobWya
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 228
Location: Cambridge,UK

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 5:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Reverse patches Reply with quote

papu wrote:
...

i don't know how to use this patch, i am interested on dolphin , but thanks at all :oops:


See also the Gentoo Wiki page that covers applying user patches...

Bob
_________________
system: G751JT (ASUS-NotebookSKU); processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz; memory: 32GiB System Memory; display: GM204M [GeForce GTX 970M]; disk: 2048GB Samsung SSD 850;BD-CMB UJ172 S;1024GB Samsung SSD 850
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhon987
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Nov 2013
Posts: 302

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The "dolphin as root not possible" just hit stable branch, and it wasn't but a mere few hours that I quickly realized I need to patch this user dispowering behavior out.
Thanks for the thread and patches, and also the quick instructions of how to apply the patches...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fitzcarraldo
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Posts: 2056
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 2:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Reverse patches Reply with quote

Nsane457 wrote:
For anyone who needs patches to reenable execution as root for kate, kwrite, and dolphin, here you go:

kwrite-17.04.0-allow-root.patch
kate-17.04.0-allow-root.patch
dolphin-17.04.0-allow-root.patch

Thanks for the patches, Nsane457. I've applied them to Dolphin/Kate/KWrite 17.04.3. Until today I was unaware KDE developers had sprung this new restriction on users. Mother knows best.
_________________
Clevo W230SS: amd64, VIDEO_CARDS="intel modesetting nvidia".
Compal NBLB2: ~amd64, xf86-video-ati. Dual boot Win 7 Pro 64-bit.
OpenRC systemd-utils[udev] elogind KDE on both.

My blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ridrok
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Posts: 116
Location: France

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks you so much for finding the commits which did that Nsane457.
I did apply these patches too, I don't see a reason why they did that. Even if I don't use them as root often we are all free to take the risk we want on our linux installations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 3456
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I assume we can just rename the patches and replace 17.04 with 17.08 in the patch text, and it will work?
Correct?
_________________
Main box- AsRock x370 Gaming K4
Ryzen 7 3700x, 3.6GHz, 16GB GSkill Flare DDR4 3200mhz
Samsung SATA 1000GB, Radeon HD R7 350 2GB DDR5
OpenRC Gentoo ~amd64 plasma, glibc-2.40-r5, gcc-14
kernel-6.12.3 USE=experimental python3_12.7-final-0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 9320

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No rename necessary if you placed your patches inside /etc/portage/patches/kde-apps/dolphin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Holysword
l33t
l33t


Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 946
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wrc1944 wrote:
How about an optional Gentoo USE flag (with approriate warnings) for enabling kdesu so users can opt in for the very useful "kdesu dolphin" again?

Any comment on this specific line?
I'd be more than interested in that.

If I'd have to apply the patches manually every time that a new KDE update is available in the tree comes up with an update (which is fairly often) I'd drop the whole KDE suite instead and find something else.
_________________
"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 9320

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You've never heard of epatch_user, did you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Holysword
l33t
l33t


Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 946
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

asturm wrote:
You've never heard of epatch_user, did you?

No, not really.
Will it really be able to apply this patch even if the source code varies a lot?
_________________
"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 9320

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, of course not. But is that particular part of the code changing much? I doubt so. You'll find out anyway.

Meanwhile upstream is working on a real solution around kio/kauth support which we hopefully are going to see in kf-5.40/kde-apps-17.12.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dalek
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 1353
Location: Mississippi USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Holysword wrote:
asturm wrote:
You've never heard of epatch_user, did you?

No, not really.
Will it really be able to apply this patch even if the source code varies a lot?


I've been using it this way for a while and so far, it works. If it stops working, I'll post here and most likely, others will too.
_________________
My rig: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P mobo, AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core CPU, ZALMAN CNPS10X Performa CPU cooler,
G.SKILL 32GB DDR3 PC3 12800 Memory Nvidia GTX-650 video card LG W2253 Monitor
60TBs of hard drive space using LVM
Cooler Master HAF-932 Case
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 3456
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 17.04 patches in /etc/portage/patches/kde-apps/dolphin/ are still working for my kde-apps/dolphin-17.08.2

plasma-meta-5.11.1
KDE Frameworks 5.39.0
Qt 5.9.2 (built against 5.9.2) system.
_________________
Main box- AsRock x370 Gaming K4
Ryzen 7 3700x, 3.6GHz, 16GB GSkill Flare DDR4 3200mhz
Samsung SATA 1000GB, Radeon HD R7 350 2GB DDR5
OpenRC Gentoo ~amd64 plasma, glibc-2.40-r5, gcc-14
kernel-6.12.3 USE=experimental python3_12.7-final-0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22853

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even if epatch_user works, it's a fairly ugly approach for a problem encountered by numerous users. When the patch is managed locally, every system that needs it must prepare it independently; users need to stumble across a discussion of the problem before they are aware it can be changed; if it breaks, every system needs to find where someone posted an updated version and update the local patch accordingly. When it's managed by a USE flag, it's easy to discover, it's managed in one place by a maintainer, and it's easier for new users to activate than a local patch would be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum