| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DeckedSpring67
n00b
Joined: 14 May 2014
Posts: 8
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:42 am Post subject: Segmentation Fault on emerge/ebuild (SOLVED) |
 |
|
Hello everyone,
Today I'm having some problems with my Gentoo ~amd64 install.
I was happily updating my system when portage just returns a Segmentation Fault.
It usually happens when it checks the Manifests.
Here's a tail of "strace emerge -1 portage"
| Code: |
stat("/usr/portage/distfiles/portage-2.3.16.tar.bz2", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=949134, ...}) = 0
ioctl(1, TCGETS, 0x7ffcbcc5d1a0) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
stat("/usr/portage/distfiles/portage-2.3.16.tar.bz2", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=949134, ...}) = 0
stat("/usr/portage/distfiles/portage-2.3.16.tar.bz2", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=949134, ...}) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/portage/distfiles/portage-2.3.16.tar.bz2", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 8
fstat(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=949134, ...}) = 0
ioctl(8, TCGETS, 0x7ffcbcc5cc30) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
fstat(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=949134, ...}) = 0
lseek(8, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SI_KERNEL, si_addr=NULL} ---
Calculating dependencies
* IMPORTANT: 17 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
* Use eselect news read to view new items.
. ... done!
>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-apps/portage-2.3.16::gentoo
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
|
I should also mention that it SegFaults after I do a | Code: | | ebuild <filename> manifest |
aswell.
Here's a list of things I've tried to do:
Booting into a usb stick and do a "fsck -v -f /dev/sdb1" (My root partition) and no errors were found.
Removing /var/tmp/portage.
Removing /usr/portage and do an "emerge --sync" (Which works by the way).
What could the cause be?
[EDIT]
It seems that it fixed itself after either removing the distfile it was accessing or removing "FEATURES="distcc distcc-pump" from my make.conf file.
Thread marked as solved
_________________
.... Why do signatures exist? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tranquilcool
Veteran
Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1179
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
same here, but not solved.
_________________
this is a strange strange world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54289
Location: 56N 3W
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tranquilcool,
I suspect the fixed it.
There has been a new hash added to the portage manifest.
_________________
Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fedeliallalinea
Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 30946
Location: here
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NeddySeagoon wrote: | tranquilcool,
I suspect the fixed it.
There has been a new hash added to the portage manifest. |
Correct same error here, and relative bug
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Portage & Programming
