View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Linubie Guru
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 382
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2019 11:35 pm Post subject: Steam for Linux-proton fsync testing announcement from valve |
|
|
https://steamcommunity.com/app/221410/discussions/0/3158631000006906163/
It seems we have to patch the kernel for it but I have no idea how to get the full patchset for it.
From what understand there are only kernels for ubuntu and arch right now.
If someone has an idea how to patch the kernel, to let us participate in the testing please feel free to share your knowlegde.
Thank you! _________________ Mircosoft software is like having sex with a stranger, you always have to be careful not to get infected with something... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
netfab Veteran
Joined: 03 Mar 2005 Posts: 1956 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Linubie wrote: |
If someone has an idea how to patch the kernel, to let us participate in the testing please feel free to share your knowlegde.
|
Not tested. Two patchs here :
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/1398
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/1399
According to here should apply to latest 5.3 branch.
If you test it, please update this thread with useful informations (kernel version, tested game, ...). Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ant P. Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6920
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What does this do, exactly? It doesn't seem to be related to fsync(2) at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
netfab Veteran
Joined: 03 Mar 2005 Posts: 1956 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ant P. wrote: | What does this do, exactly? It doesn't seem to be related to fsync(2) at all. |
From here :
Quote: |
As such, we're proposing changes to the Linux kernel[lkml.org] to extend the futex() system call to expose
what we think is the needed extra bit of core functionality needed to support optimal thread pool synchronization.
Proton 4.11 includes the fsync patchset, which will leverage this new Linux kernel functionality to replace esync
when supported. For more technical details, refer to the link to the proposed kernel changes above.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
donmartio Apprentice
Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 261
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2019 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm testing this already with witcher3. Posted here what i've done to patch the kernel.
The results for witcher are good. Runs smoother on my Ryzen 5 1600 with nvidia GTX 970. _________________ Always code as if the person who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Main Man Veteran
Joined: 27 Nov 2014 Posts: 1171 Location: /run/user/1000
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2019 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are also patches for glibc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
donmartio Apprentice
Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 261
|
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The glibc patch is just a proof of concept proposal, as far as i understood. _________________ Always code as if the person who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adcdam Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jan 2015 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2019 9:33 pm Post subject: Are you sure the patches were applied? |
|
|
i followed your guide but the patches has to go to /etc/portage/patches/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-what ever the kernel and you put the patch in /etc/portage/patches/gentoo-sources-5.2.5
if the patch is well applied it say user patches applied. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
donmartio Apprentice
Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 261
|
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2019 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Uhhh yea you are right. I did not copy the whole stuff but have written it down.
Fixed that. Thanks. _________________ Always code as if the person who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Linubie Guru
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 382
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is also a compiled version of proton available.
https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/proton-ge-custom/releases
You only need to unpack your downloaded version into
Code: | ~/.steam/steam/compatibilitytools.d/ |
and choose the version you want to test in steam setting. _________________ Mircosoft software is like having sex with a stranger, you always have to be careful not to get infected with something... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hedmo Veteran
Joined: 29 Aug 2009 Posts: 1331 Location: sweden
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
hi all
i am on the fsync train to.you only need one patch now to get it to work. i did not have the kernel option in my kernel so i copied
the kernel config from the clone and now :
Code: |
fsync: up and running
|
can someone tell me what kernel option i need tog get this working on my custom config?
Linubie
i am running a git version of proton from my local overlay :
https://github.com/hedmo/hedmos-overlay
and the fsync is running there to so it is integrated in proton.the
https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/proton-ge-custom/releases
does not work for me and i cannot edit that build
regards hedmo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ionen Developer
Joined: 06 Dec 2018 Posts: 2852
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
hedmo wrote: | can someone tell me what kernel option i need tog get this working on my custom config? | There's no kernel option for fsync (not right now anyway), you just need the patch and you're done (it makes no kconfig changes). I just used the patch given by archlinux (futex-wait-multiple-5.2.1.patch) and it still works on 5.4.6 alongside my custom configs.
Personally using normal wine-staging (from gentoo) + rebased tkg staging fsync patch + a few other handpicked patches, and it's working great (don't want to use proton, but I am so done with esync). Using wine-tkg/eggroll/proton directly is a simpler solution though, I need to sort out the patches myself with new versions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hedmo Veteran
Joined: 29 Aug 2009 Posts: 1331 Location: sweden
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ionen wrote: | hedmo wrote: | can someone tell me what kernel option i need tog get this working on my custom config? | There's no kernel option for fsync (not right now anyway), you just need the patch and you're done (it makes no kconfig changes). I just used the patch given by archlinux (futex-wait-multiple-5.2.1.patch) and it still works on 5.4.6.
Personally using normal wine-staging (from gentoo) + rebased tkg staging fsync patch + a few other handpicked patches, and it's working great (don't want to bother with proton, and I am so done with esync). Using wine-tkg/eggroll/proton directly is a simpler solution though, I need to sort out the patches myself with new versions. |
Ionen
i am going to try my custom config again.what is :
Code: | wine-tkg/eggroll/proton |
i like to know if there is other proton ebuilds i can use and patch.i need to patch the wine version on proton to get BOTW to run with vulkan.
edit: found it (wine-tkg/eggroll/proton) but how do you patch it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ionen Developer
Joined: 06 Dec 2018 Posts: 2852
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you want a proton overlay, this might work: https://github.com/pchome/proton-gentoo-overlay, not that I've used it (but pchome typically knows what he's doing assuming it's not outdated). Edit: then again, looking at your overlay it looks like a fork of that so I guess that's not helping (are you not able add patches your own overlay? ...or just set normal user patches).
As I mentioned I only take patches from those bigger projects (like fsync support) and use gentoo's native wine ebuild, so I can't really help you with proton. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hedmo Veteran
Joined: 29 Aug 2009 Posts: 1331 Location: sweden
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mappy n00b
Joined: 21 Jun 2019 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ionen wrote: | hedmo wrote: | can someone tell me what kernel option i need tog get this working on my custom config? | There's no kernel option for fsync (not right now anyway), you just need the patch and you're done (it makes no kconfig changes). I just used the patch given by archlinux (futex-wait-multiple-5.2.1.patch) and it still works on 5.4.6 alongside my custom configs.
Personally using normal wine-staging (from gentoo) + rebased tkg staging fsync patch + a few other handpicked patches, and it's working great (don't want to use proton, but I am so done with esync). Using wine-tkg/eggroll/proton directly is a simpler solution though, I need to sort out the patches myself with new versions. |
Do you have a rebased patch that would work for wine-staging 4.21 or 5.0? I tried the 4.13 one that's available here but it seems like it isn't compatible:
https://github.com/doitsujin/dxvk/issues/1163 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ionen Developer
Joined: 06 Dec 2018 Posts: 2852
|
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mappy wrote: | Do you have a rebased patch that would work for wine-staging 4.21 or 5.0? | I still have the one I used for wine-staging-4.21 that been working great (WINEFSYNC=1 to enable), probably not be a hard fix but it doesn't apply on 5.0 (was planning to look into that much later). Can always check tkg patches instead but the staging patch need to be rebased to work with gentoo's ebuild due to the way it applies staging patches, mine should apply 100% cleanly with wine-staging-4.21.ebuild as a user patch, unless want wine-vanilla.
On the kernel end, the archlinux patch still works on 5.4.13 (haven't built 14 yet but I'm sure it's fine). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mappy n00b
Joined: 21 Jun 2019 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ionen wrote: | Mappy wrote: | Do you have a rebased patch that would work for wine-staging 4.21 or 5.0? | I still have the one I used for wine-staging-4.21 that been working great (WINEFSYNC=1 to enable), probably not be a hard fix but it doesn't apply on 5.0 (was planning to look into that much later). Can always check tkg patches instead but the staging patch need to be rebased to work with gentoo's ebuild due to the way it applies staging patches, mine should apply 100% cleanly with wine-staging-4.21.ebuild as a user patch, unless want wine-vanilla. |
Thank you, it works great. Do you have a guide I could read to learn how to rebase a patch myself? Or would you by any chance consider maintaining a repo for your patches? I would like to be able to use fsync with future updates, but if it's too much of a bother then don't worry about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ionen Developer
Joined: 06 Dec 2018 Posts: 2852
|
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2020 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mappy wrote: | Thank you, it works great. Do you have a guide I could read to learn how to rebase a patch myself? Or would you by any chance consider maintaining a repo for your patches? I would like to be able to use fsync with future updates, but if it's too much of a bother then don't worry about it. | It's nothing that need actual work. Just need a wine tree with staging patches applied with --no-autoconf then use fuzz (-F) for fsync patches (it could potentially produce wrong results but well, it works).
For example, assuming have in the same directory: wine-5.8.tar.xz extracted, wine-staging-5.8.tar.gz patchset extracted as well (both from /var/cache/distfiles), and fsync patches from Tk-Glitch, can run: Code: | WINEVER=5.8 # update as needed
./wine-staging-${WINEVER}/patches/patchinstall.sh DESTDIR=wine-${WINEVER} --no-autoconf --all &&
cp -a wine-${WINEVER} wine-fsync &&
patch -d wine-fsync -p1 -F 3 --no-backup-if-mismatch < fsync-staging.patch &&
patch -d wine-fsync -p1 -F 3 --no-backup-if-mismatch < fsync-staging-no_alloc_handle.patch &&
diff -Naur wine-${WINEVER} wine-fsync > wine-staging-fsync.patch | Resulting wine-staging-fsync.patch should be usable as a gentoo user patch with the main repos' ebuild.
If it doesn't work (or want older wine version), may need to use legacy patches from TKG, sometimes latest has been updated for the upcoming version and isn't for currently released wine. Alternatively, can also try eggroll's which is based on TKG's,
Update 2020-05-12: fixed up post a bit and added ready-to-use patch for wine-staging-5.8 due to a request
Update 2020-06-07: known broken with 5.10+ (both esync and fsync), so don't bother until someone makes working patches again
Update 2020-09-14: removed dead ready-to-use patch links, can still be remade using above instructions for 5.0/5.8, just use right versions from git.
Update 2020-10-19: not released yet but looking at commits wine-staging-5.20 is bringing back esync, and wine-tkg has new fsync-unix patches |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TechwoIf n00b
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Update 2020-10-19: not released yet but looking at commits wine-staging-5.20 is bringing back esync, and wine-tkg has new fsync-unix patches |
Would love to get those patches. I use the zen-kernel and would like to do some testing. Every patch I found was either for an old version or custom wine-xxxx that incompatible with wine-staging. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mappy n00b
Joined: 21 Jun 2019 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2020 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
TechwoIf wrote: | Quote: | Update 2020-10-19: not released yet but looking at commits wine-staging-5.20 is bringing back esync, and wine-tkg has new fsync-unix patches |
Would love to get those patches. I use the zen-kernel and would like to do some testing. Every patch I found was either for an old version or custom wine-xxxx that incompatible with wine-staging. |
The fsync-unix-staging.patch from here works for me using Ionen's script. Just replace the fsync-staging.patch and fsync-staging-no_alloc_handle.patch lines with it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TechwoIf n00b
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mappy wrote: |
The fsync-unix-staging.patch from here works for me using Ionen's script. Just replace the fsync-staging.patch and fsync-staging-no_alloc_handle.patch lines with it. |
Thank you for the info. I downloaded fsync-unix-staging.patch to /etc/portage/patches/app-emulation/wine-staging-5.20 and emerge -1av wine-staging. Turns out fsync-staging-no_alloc_handle.patch is no longer needed.
Starting up wine with "export WINEFSYNC=1" gives no "fsync: up and running." I am running linux-zen and the output of "cat /proc/kallsyms | grep futex_wait_multiple" shows the kernel does have it.
Wine-staging 5.20(without the fsync patch) does have esync enable and shows it in the output. I get about 50% to 100% performance increase in Elder Scrolls Online. Was hoping to get fsync working and get a bit more on top of that.
EDIT/UPDATE: Turns out re-emergeing wine-staging set "eselect wine" to wine-vanilla. No wonder it was not working. The wrong wine was being used. Selected the right one and now its working. Will be doing some A/B testing with Elder Scrolls Online.
Last edited by TechwoIf on Sat Nov 14, 2020 9:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ionen Developer
Joined: 06 Dec 2018 Posts: 2852
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TechwoIf wrote: | Wine-staging 5.20(without the fsync patch) does have esync enable and shows it in the output. I get about 50% to 100% performance increase in Elder Scrolls Online. Was hoping to get fsync working and get a bit more on top of that. | While using esync or fsync can give a noticeable boost on cpu-bound games, using fsync over esync is almost identical performance as far as I'm aware. But esync is more like a hack that use an absurd amount of file descriptors in unintended ways, so fsync would be a better long term solution (or at least if kernel gets support officially added).
If esync works, then can stick with that for less wine patching hassle (that's what I do now). I haven't tested fsync in a while myself, so I can't really help anymore but good luck to anyone wanting it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lgael n00b
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For information there are patches for wine / wine-staging made by Linux SC users :
I tried to applied the second on top of wine-staging by putting it in /etc/portage/patches/app-emulation/wine-staging/fsync.patch and emerging wine-staging-9999
However, it fails to apply on some files, because it seems that the ebuild/portage try to apply on top of wine files, not wine files fully patched with staging.
my patch is applied as the last one => ok but at this moment, for example include/wine/server_protocol.h is wine iso, not wine-staging iso (with esync code referred by fsync patch).
Code: |
* Applying wine-5.9-Revert-makedep-Install-also-generated-typelib-for-in.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying fsync-wine-staging-6.0-rc2.patch ...
(...)
patching file include/wine/server_protocol.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 5347 (offset -87 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 5801.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 6087.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 6371.
(...)
|
If I build wine-staging-9999 without my fsync patch it does the following :
Code: |
* Applying wine-5.9-Revert-makedep-Install-also-generated-typelib-for-in.patch ... [ ok ]
* Running eautoreconf in '/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/wine-staging-9999/work/wine-9999' ...
* Running autoconf --force ... [ ok ]
* Running autoheader ... [ ok ]
* Running elibtoolize in: wine-9999/
* server/protocol.def was patched; running tools/make_requests
include/wine/server_protocol.h updated
include/wine/server_protocol.h updated
server/trace.c updated
server/request.h updated
>>> Source prepared.
|
So it looks like some files are updated/patched after my user patch... How can I apply my patch just before >>> Source prepared ?
I modified the patch so it compiles but I found strange that I can't patch files on top of wine-staging...
For gentoo-sources-5.4x I applied an arch fsync patch 5.1. It works.
It is difficult to understand which patches to apply... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobWya Apprentice
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 228 Location: Cambridge,UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@lgael
The patch is obviously not designed for Gentoo app-emulation/wine-staging - which runs some additional configuration steps after User patches have been applied (Wine auto-generates some files - using a Wine builtin tool utility).
I've rebased the patch for: app-emulation/wine-staging:6.0_rc5 - so at least it applies cleanly without any fuzzing:
wine-staging-6.0_rc5-fsync.patch
Disclaimer: I've not done much testing with this patched Wine Staging build!
Bob _________________ system: G751JT (ASUS-NotebookSKU); processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz; memory: 32GiB System Memory; display: GM204M [GeForce GTX 970M]; disk: 2048GB Samsung SSD 850;BD-CMB UJ172 S;1024GB Samsung SSD 850 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|