Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
linux process priority for ksoftirqd
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Vieri
l33t
l33t


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 887

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2019 11:10 am    Post subject: linux process priority for ksoftirqd Reply with quote

Hi,

I have a pretty busy network going through a Gentoo firewall/router. Lots of packets means my ksoftirqd processes are using quite a lot of CPU. I'm trying to optimize my NIC settings, but I think I can't get any better unless I change hardware.

However, I want to make sure I prioritize CPU power for the ksoftirqd processes because I noticed that if by any chance another process runs on any of my 8 cores at a high rate (100% CPU) then the network usually lags for a short while.

Code:
root         3  2.2  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 490:59 [ksoftirqd/0]
root        14  4.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 882:36 [ksoftirqd/1]
root        19  2.2  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 480:08 [ksoftirqd/2]
root        24  3.4  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 761:05 [ksoftirqd/3]
root        29  2.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 441:51 [ksoftirqd/4]
root        34  3.5  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 769:20 [ksoftirqd/5]
root        39  3.6  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 805:29 [ksoftirqd/6]
root        44  8.9  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 1945:55 [ksoftirqd/7]


So I'm wondering how to make sure that the ksoftirqd process is always guaranteed to have (eg.) up to 50% cpu for it (per core).
In other words, if another resource-hungry process starts on eg. core 3 and would normally eat up 100% power, how do I make sure that ksoftirqd wil always have the upper hand?

Alternatively, although less efficient, how can I tell the OS to "dedicate" cores 0-6 to ksoftirqd (and NOT run ksoftirqd on core 7), and "dedicate" core 7 to "everything else"?

Code:
# ps ax -o pid,ni,cmd | grep ksoftirqd
    3   0 [ksoftirqd/0]
   14   0 [ksoftirqd/1]
   19   0 [ksoftirqd/2]
   24   0 [ksoftirqd/3]
   29   0 [ksoftirqd/4]
   34   0 [ksoftirqd/5]
   39   0 [ksoftirqd/6]
   44   0 [ksoftirqd/7]


"top"'s PR value is 20 for ksoftirqd. It's also 20 for most "normal" processes (userland).
The lower the PR value the higher the priority, right?

So how can I change the priority of ksoftirqd and why isn't it already higher by default?

[EDIT]

Code:
# ps aux | grep ksoftirqd
root         3  2.2  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 490:59 [ksoftirqd/0]
root        14  4.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 882:36 [ksoftirqd/1]
root        19  2.1  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 480:09 [ksoftirqd/2]
root        24  3.4  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 761:05 [ksoftirqd/3]
root        29  2.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 441:52 [ksoftirqd/4]
root        34  3.5  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 769:21 [ksoftirqd/5]
root        39  3.6  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 805:30 [ksoftirqd/6]
root        44  8.8  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Oct10 1945:56 [ksoftirqd/7]

# chrt -p 3
pid 3's current scheduling policy: SCHED_OTHER
pid 3's current scheduling priority: 0
# chrt -p 14
pid 14's current scheduling policy: SCHED_OTHER
pid 14's current scheduling priority: 0

[...]

# chrt -p 44
pid 44's current scheduling policy: SCHED_OTHER
pid 44's current scheduling priority: 0


Should I use chrt or renice to change the priority? (how exactly?)

Would changing CONFIG_PREEMPT* values when recompiling the kernel help a Linux router?
I haven't found a clear guide for that yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum