View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Chickpea l33t
Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 846 Location: Vancouver WA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 1:13 am Post subject: Flowe Desktop |
|
|
Was curious to know if anyone out there has used the Flowe Desktop. I was flipping thru the June 2002 issue of the Linux Journal and there was an advertisement for this desktop which I have never heard of. It can be found at http://www.codeflex.com
It looks as if it is primarily geared to the new linux convert from windows. I am thinking of installing it so that I can get my husband using Linux more. He is still a little shy around Linux.
Any thoughts?
Cat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cranch n00b
Joined: 02 Jul 2002 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
That all depends on what your husband likes to use... If hes Windows based, I'd stick with something like KDE or Gnome. They are more user friendly for the most part. It's alot easier for a Windows user to use KDE than it would be to use Fluxbox... (for the most part). Never used it, but it doesn't look like anything TOO spectacular to me... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Haven't used it, but it looks fairly Windows like, so I don't think it'd be a big visual issue. There is a free version, so downloading and checking it out is probably the best option. Also, if you do, you must post a report on the forums _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aardvark Guru
Joined: 30 Jun 2002 Posts: 576
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tried it! It works on gentoo but is a bit broken (some things don't work/ should have redhat or other big)
It is not complete yet and is basically only a file browser that looks like konqueror or windows explorer ,a dektop and a config tool. All other apps are basically existing ones as netscape xmms etc. that ic calls from it menu and that it uses from the system. One other possibly interesting part that isn't working yet is a media player. The looks are ok and the speed is a bit higher that kde. It does not appear to be open source, to it somehow clashes a bit with the linux spirit.
The funny thing is that these codeflex guys are very quiet about it. I only ran into it on one occasion where I read a small news posting about.
Let's all try it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Swishy Guru
Joined: 06 Jun 2002 Posts: 491 Location: NZ
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hey aardvark , what would be the main difference for a windows user between it and kde , looks VERY much like a kde style interface without all the shiny bits by the pics on the website.....
Cheers
Dale... _________________ Theres no substitute for C.I. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aardvark Guru
Joined: 30 Jun 2002 Posts: 576
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It may indeed be more like konqueror than explorer, but then again, konqueror also looks and feels a bit like windows explorer. It (the flowe) lacks the ability to view (internet) html in the filemanager however.
The big difference to windows is I guess that you can change the content/function of the left pane just like in kde. I'm pretty sure that it is not based on kde though.
The difference to kde is that it still misses a lot of integration and uses many "3rd party" stuff like netscape. The help functions seems pretty good to me. There is a lot of (pop-up) help!
I already erased it from my crowded gcc2.95 partition (wont work on a gentoo 1.3b system), So I can't give any more details |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russki Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Apr 2002 Posts: 119 Location: Prague, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thay do have a bad taste in wallpapers... _________________ Facts are stupid things.
-Ronald Reagan
[img]http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd be curious to know what their code is based on. I find no mention o it on their website. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goldorak_dan n00b
Joined: 26 Apr 2002 Posts: 16 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking more along the lines of, 'from scratch', based on KDE etc. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rac Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 6553 Location: Japanifornia
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kanuslupus wrote: | I was thinking more along the lines of, 'from scratch', based on KDE etc. |
Looks like "from scratch", by one Tan T. Phan. _________________ For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. I was more impressed with "did all of the work -- nights and weekends from 1988 to 2000, and >> full-time in 2001." than "Flowe got started from 1998, not 1988 -- My typo!"
I'm still amazed with what can be found on the internet. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bjork n00b
Joined: 09 Aug 2002 Posts: 2 Location: oakland, ca
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2002 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
my eyes! they burn! the goggles, they do nothing!
looks a lil tooo much like windows for my tastes... _________________ <--- my tax refund. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2002 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
bjork wrote: | my eyes! they burn! the goggles, they do nothing!
looks a lil tooo much like windows for my tastes... |
That is part of what the thread was about.
Chickpea wrote: | It looks as if it is primarily geared to the new linux convert from windows. I am thinking of installing it so that I can get my husband using Linux more. He is still a little shy around Linux. |
_________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spark Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Jun 2002 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2002 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nah, using a proprietory desktop like that that is even a cheap ripoff of another proprietory desktop will just make your system a cheap alternative to the other system. :/ It costs less but can also do less. What's the point.
I do like their windowmanager theme though, maybe I will use the buttonspart as "inspiration" for a new Metacity theme. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chickpea l33t
Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 846 Location: Vancouver WA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2002 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yea, after looking at it again, I think I like it less. I guess I will just stick to what I got and make my husband learn it. He'll come around eventually.
C |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neuron Advocate
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 2371
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2002 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
pfft.. if you want something like windows there are plenty of better window managers to choose from. I ain't ever installing a closed source window manager with so many better ones to choose from |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2002 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Other than it being closed source, what is bad about it? Give us a detailed review of your experience using it. I'm curious about it, just not enough to install it. Supposedly it is leaner than many others. That would be an advantage. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neuron Advocate
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 2371
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2002 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
kanuslupus wrote: | Other than it being closed source, what is bad about it? Give us a detailed review of your experience using it. I'm curious about it, just not enough to install it. Supposedly it is leaner than many others. That would be an advantage. |
you can start by looking at the system requirements... those arn't exactly comparable with the extreamly low spec stuff that currently runs fine on linux boxes...
I don't want my stuff to use a shitload of memory and resources.. then again, I'm a blackbox user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ebrostig Bodhisattva
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 3152 Location: Orlando, Fl
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2002 8:56 pm Post subject: Flowe... |
|
|
I decided to give the Flowe desktop a go.
I downloaded the parts from their website and ran the installer. It all went very smooth.
After the install I ran startflowe from the command prompt and boy was I surprised!!!!
The full load of the desktop took only a few seconds, very fast!
Personally I think it looks nice. They have obviously done a lot of work on the GUI. To me it looks more like KDE than Windows.
I think the buttons and panels and window decorations have a mor
e soft feeling to them than much of the crappy themes and decorations seen for both Gnome and KDE. There are a lot of good themes/decorations for KDE/GNOME but most of them are unusable in my opiono. They are nomrally too intrusive and to much contrast/color. Or even too much decoration. Kind of reminds of old paintings with ENORMOUS gold frames. The frame gets the attention and not the picture (here the contents of the window).
I think the Flowe desktop is a good thing. It looks very solid, very fast. It is not GPL, but frankly I couldn't care less. I have no intention of messing around with the source, nor do I have any intention of writing any extensions to the desktop.
Too many people have been hooked on the thing that a program without the source code available is an evil program and should never be touched. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Let me ask you all a question since we are running Gentoo and building everything from scratch:
- How many of you have made modifications to the source that you compiled in order to get Gentoo up and running.
- How many of you have submitted the changes to the maintainer of the code?
- How many of you have even the knowledge to make any source code changes to the programs that Gentoo is based upon?
Personally, I have the knowledge and the understanding in most cases, but I have other more productive things to do, I have a life! LOL, hard to believe but it is true!
I have messed around with the source on a couple of file-systems on kernel level, but it has been because I have done so to get better performance on my company's main application, not because I just had the source available
Erik |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2002 10:39 pm Post subject: Re: Flowe... |
|
|
Thanks for the review. I was hoping someone was adventurous enough to check it out. I also have no problems with it being closed source (and a version for $).
ebrostig wrote: | Let me ask you all a question since we are running Gentoo and building everything from scratch:
- How many of you have made modifications to the source that you compiled in order to get Gentoo up and running.
- How many of you have submitted the changes to the maintainer of the code?
- How many of you have even the knowledge to make any source code changes to the programs that Gentoo is based upon? |
Not me. Know why it still matters? Windows is closed too, and IMO, MS is incompetant at providing security patches. Or even a reasonably secure product to begin with. I'm not looking for another place to slam MS, I'm just mentioning it in comparison to Flowe. If Flowe is able to produce reasonably quick security patches, then I will have no problem with it. That is why I want the source available. Plus, I want to optimize it (you are running Gentoo, aren't you?). _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neuron Advocate
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 2371
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:41 pm Post subject: Re: Flowe... |
|
|
ebrostig wrote: |
- How many of you have made modifications to the source that you compiled in order to get Gentoo up and running.
- How many of you have submitted the changes to the maintainer of the code?
- How many of you have even the knowledge to make any source code changes to the programs that Gentoo is based upon?
|
yes yes and I do
and that's not the point, open source means if libs get updated so does the program, bugfixes shows up WAY faster and development generaly goes way faster. Compiling from source also gives better performance and stability. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ebrostig Bodhisattva
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 3152 Location: Orlando, Fl
|
Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2002 9:09 pm Post subject: Re: Flowe... |
|
|
neuron wrote: | ebrostig wrote: |
- How many of you have made modifications to the source that you compiled in order to get Gentoo up and running.
- How many of you have submitted the changes to the maintainer of the code?
- How many of you have even the knowledge to make any source code changes to the programs that Gentoo is based upon?
|
yes yes and I do
and that's not the point, open source means if libs get updated so does the program, bugfixes shows up WAY faster and development generaly goes way faster. Compiling from source also gives better performance and stability. |
Hmmm. If a library gets updated, a shared library mind you, ANY application that uses this library, open source or not, will be "updated".
But that is not the point. The question whether a product is open source or not is not vital to most people in the world.
That is also why Gentoo Linux will never be a hit in the mass-consumer market. Joe User is not interested in compiling everything from scratch, implying a time from start of install until a usable system exists of multiple days. Joe User wants to flip a CD into his PC, answer a couple of quick questions and be done.
This is the area any Linux distribution with intention of becoming a mass-product needs to focus along with a better package installation system.
Joe User have no idea of the difference between various source code licenses, nor does Joe User want to know about them. They are annoyed whenever they have to click 'I Accept' on any type of license and I think you will have a hard time finding any Joe User who have actually read any kind of EULA, GPL or other.
Don't bash a product because it doesn't suit YOU. It may be the answer for a lot of people who is not as technically savvy as most people here. Besides, Joe User never reads the Gentoo Forums anyway, he doesn't even know that anything called Gentoo exists.
Me on the other hand, is very happy with Gentoo. I'm also happy to run the Flowe desktop from time to time. The desktop I run daily is the latest KDE cvs version. I also use Opera as my main browser, another closed source product that causes most of you to see red when the name is mentioned. But, I love that browser, it's fast and it does exactly what I want it to do. Your milage may vary and that is great!
Erik |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|