Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
ATA kernel upgrade error (5.14.15 -> 5.15)
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
andyr7
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Posts: 23
Location: ::1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:25 am    Post subject: ATA kernel upgrade error (5.14.15 -> 5.15) Reply with quote

Hi guys!

Just a quick question,
After kernel upgrade from 5.14.15 -> 5.15 I got the following messages from kernel before the OpenRC starts:
Code:

andreas@gentoo ~ $ dmesg | grep -i fail
[    1.302355] ata2.00: Read log page 0x08 failed, Emask 0x1
[    1.303024] ata2.00: Read log page 0x08 failed, Emask 0x1
[    3.849056] r8169 0000:04:00.0: Direct firmware load for rtl_nic/rtl8168h-2.fw failed with error -2
andreas@gentoo ~ $


Note that in grub I load the kernel with parameters "ro quiet"
Do you have any idea what is this - how can I correct it?

Thank you in advance for your support,
Andreas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marlo
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 1591

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If ata2 is an NTFS drive, then the error message is new and related to the new ntfs3 kernel driver.
I think this is harmless but may be wrong of course.

I don't have a Realtek but try making the r8169 driver as a module. So that the firmware has enough time to be loaded.
_________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://radio.garden/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3998

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In both 5.15.0 & 5.15.1
Code:
amd64 ~ # dmesg | grep -i fail
[    0.730264] ata3.00: Read log page 0x08 failed, Emask 0x1
[    0.738101] ata3.00: Read log page 0x08 failed, Emask 0x1
where drive is Sata II & kernel NTFS is activated.

No idea what's happening there.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3998

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cancelling new kernel
Code:
CONFIG_NTFS3_FS
didn't help there.

Likely to be a warning only here.

Message removal is prefered here...

Failed trying to remove ata3 msg using
Code:
Device Drivers/CONFIG_ATA/CONFIG_ATA_FORCE=y providing libata.force=
kernel command line param, which I'm new at, so no surprise if I've missed up param value definition, should message cancellation be achievable that way :oops:.

Sata II disk on Sata III capable mb controller.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andyr7
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Posts: 23
Location: ::1

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CaptainBlood wrote:
Cancelling new kernel
Code:
CONFIG_NTFS3_FS
didn't help there.

Likely to be a warning only here.

Message removal is prefered here...

Failed trying to remove ata3 msg using
Code:
Device Drivers/CONFIG_ATA/CONFIG_ATA_FORCE=y providing libata.force=
kernel command line param, which I'm new at, so no surprise if I've missed up param value definition, should message cancellation be achievable that way :oops:.

Sata II disk on Sata III capable mb controller.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.


Indeed canceling CONFIG_NTFS3_FS didn't help..

At least, I can hide this annoying error by using loglevel=0 on grub params.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum