| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
eccerr0r
Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 9698
Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2024 2:21 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
There's irony in the past that Chromium was faster to build than Firefox because Firefox needed rust to also be built...
But anyway Firefox mostly take 1.5 hours or less on most of my aging regular computers (again with distcc help). I figure I should make my PVR help with distcc jobs if it is recording anyway...
How bad is webkit-gtk based browsers for compliance these days? Compared to firefox and qtwebengine/chromium ?
_________________
Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chiitoo
Administrator
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 2589
Location: Here and Away Again
|
| Posted: Wed May 15, 2024 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Split off the Firefox discussion into its own topic: firefox-115.9.0 - Assertion failure: i < NUM_TEST_EV.... —Chiitoo
| lyallp wrote: | Gave up after 3 and a half DAYS.
Completely rebuilt my system from the ground up (--empty-tree @world @system) took 30 hours
Re-build chromium, took 9 hours! Huge improvement! |
Giving enough of RAM to building of things tends to improve things, as many others have already mentioned here. :]
(That 30 hours for a "world build" seems a bit of a lot of hours to me still though for that machine, trying to remember what it takes for my 6-core Phenom... speaking of which, that one built "www-client/chromium-35.0.1916.86 in 42 minutes" back in 2014... but I digress!)
_________________
Kindest of regardses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Portage & Programming
