View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
apiaio Guru
Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 426
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 11:50 am Post subject: instaling stockfish[SOLVED] |
|
|
I've emerged stockfish, but dont have xboard
Code: | # emerge stockfish -vp
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] games-board/stockfish-15-r1::gentoo USE="optimize -debug -general-32 -general-64" CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse -avx2 -popcnt" 0 KiB
|
Do I need emerge any others packages or missing some USE flag ?
Last edited by apiaio on Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pietinger Moderator
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 5272 Location: Bavaria
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stockfish is "only" a chess engine; you need a "frontend".
I am using xboard and stockfish ... BUT ... for this you need also games-board/polyglot to be able to connect both together.
(Before many years I searched for other frontends and have not found a suitable one for analyzing games; I dont play against stockfish - only analyzing games) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
apiaio Guru
Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 426
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks.
It works now. I think that last time I played chess against computer on the plane. I would like to use some chess engine for analyzing too.
Xboard offers gnuchess and crafty engines. Did you try them to use? Is stockfish better for analyzing games? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pietinger Moderator
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 5272 Location: Bavaria
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
apiaio wrote: | Xboard offers gnuchess and crafty engines. Did you try them to use? Is stockfish better for analyzing games? |
Yes, I tried both ... and I watched some games between them and stockfish ... stockfish was better
Many (every?) chess players (better than me = most of them) say all the same: stockfish 15 is at the moment the best chess engine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|