Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Documenting USE="-*"
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Documentation, Tips & Tricks
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3755

PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2024 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bugzilla[EDIT] fixed :)
Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pietinger
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 4845
Location: Bavaria

PostPosted: Thu Aug 15, 2024 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kimchi_sg wrote:
And the system set is half the size compared to the same if I used default openrc+plasma profile

I am also a friend of minimal systems; if only because it also increases security (programs that do not exist cannot contain a security-critical bug), because I am a bit paranoid about security. That is exactly why I am writing here.

I go the way that I use a plasma-profile and deactivate all use flags that I don't need, such as:
Code:
USE="-accessibility -activities -bluetooth -gstreamer -gtk -gtk3 -haptic -initramfs -ipv6 -lvm -modemmanager -networkmanager -phonon -ppp -pulseaudio -screencast -semantic-desktop -thin -thumbnail -wext -wifi -wireless"

I then compared your use flags with mine. Most of them are just support for various file formats (gif, mng, mp3, mp4, mpeg, pdf, svg, tiff; some I even added: matroska, openexr, opus, theora, webp) and of course you can turn them off if they are not needed. Another one only affects the speed of compiling qtwebengine (jumbo-build).

But what made me wonder are use-flags that increase security:

These three are already hard activated by the profile - have you activated this too?
Code:
sys-devel/gcc-13.3.1_p20240614:13::gentoo  USE="... (default-stack-clash-protection) (default-znow) ... (pie) ..."

A different use flag only makes sense with very modern CPUs - but it does not interfere:
Code:
sys-devel/gcc-13.3.1_p20240614:13::gentoo  USE="cet ...

Code:
[+  D   ] cet
    sys-devel/gcc: Enable support for control flow hijacking protection. On amd64, this provides Intel Control Flow Enforcement Technology (CET). On arm64, this provides Branch Target Identification (BTI) and Pointer
    Authentication Code (PAC) support. This is only effective on amd64 or arm64. Only provides benefits on newer CPUs. For Intel, the CPU must be at least as new as Tiger Lake. For AMD, it must be at least as new as
    Zen 3. This is harmless on older CPUs, but provides no benefit either.

"xattr" is also absolutely necessary for a hardened system.
_________________
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Pietinger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stefan11111
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Posts: 929
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pietinger wrote:
Another one only affects the speed of compiling qtwebengine (jumbo-build).

This is an important note.
There are use flags than, when set, make things more minimal of faster.
Notably USE="mininal asm threads jumbo-build pgo"
And also USE=lto (I still set this, but the primary way for lto is adding -flto to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, which I also do)
And USE=jit, which is not always used just for optimization.
And probably others, e.g. USE=jemalloc for palemoon
The options above usually come with tradeoffs, which must be researched.
For example, USE=jumbo-build increases memory usage and sometimes causes builds to fail.
USE=pgo doubles build time, etc.
pietinger wrote:

"xattr" is also absolutely necessary for a hardened system.

You mean acl?
_________________
My overlay: https://github.com/stefan11111/stefan_overlay
INSTALL_MASK="/etc/systemd /lib/systemd /usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib/modules-load.d *udev* /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d *tmpfiles* /var/lib/dbus /usr/bin/gdbus /lib/udev"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pietinger
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 4845
Location: Bavaria

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2024 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stefan11111 wrote:
You mean acl?

No, I have meant xattr ... what do you get if you do these queries ? ->
Code:
 ~ # ls- al /usr/bin/ping
-rwx--x--x 1 root root 89688 23. Mär 19:12 /usr/bin/ping
 ~ #
 ~ # getcap /usr/bin/ping
/usr/bin/ping cap_net_raw=ep
 ~ #
 ~ # getfattr -m . -d /usr/bin/ping
getfattr: Entferne führenden '/' von absoluten Pfadnamen
# file: usr/bin/ping
security.capability=0sAQAAAgAgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=

(maybe you are interested in "man capabilities" and/or https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Capabilities ?)
_________________
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Pietinger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kimchi_sg
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Posts: 3035

PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pietinger wrote:

These three are already hard activated by the profile - have you activated this too?
Code:
sys-devel/gcc-13.3.1_p20240614:13::gentoo  USE="... (default-stack-clash-protection) (default-znow) ... (pie) ..."

I don't go to the extent of overriding hard-enabled flags.
pietinger wrote:

"xattr" is also absolutely necessary for a hardened system.

Functionally it makes no difference so I leave it off, security-conscious folks can turn it on again... choice is king. 8)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pietinger
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 4845
Location: Bavaria

PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 1:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kimchi_sg wrote:
pietinger wrote:

These three are already hard activated by the profile - have you activated this too?
Code:
sys-devel/gcc-13.3.1_p20240614:13::gentoo  USE="... (default-stack-clash-protection) (default-znow) ... (pie) ..."

I don't go to the extent of overriding hard-enabled flags.

I may have expressed myself misleadingly: I did not mean to overwrite them, but to ask whether they are activated (which they should be).
_________________
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Pietinger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Documentation, Tips & Tricks All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum