Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
media-gfx/freecad-0.21.2-r2: useless rebuild for USE=qt5
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3903

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:17 pm    Post subject: media-gfx/freecad-0.21.2-r2: useless rebuild for USE=qt5 Reply with quote

New media-gfx/freecad-0.21.2-r2 is dedicated to qt6 integration.
However many not qt6 ready packages share with media-gfx/freecad-0.21.2 many dependencies e.g sci-libs/vtk.
Currently sci-libs/vtk doesn't seems to support USE="qt5 qt6"
So jumping to media-gfx/freecad[qt6] isn't an option here yet.

media-gfx/freecad-0.21.2-r1 has been updated less that a day ago, then finally ghostly (commitless) removed from gitweb.gentoo.org.

For installed with USE=-qt6 the current situation to avoid costly useless rebuild is to
Code:
emerge --exclude media-gfx/freecad

Sounds overly complicated when media-gfx/freecad-0.21.2-r1 could have been kept in tree for the time being.

There may be a way to trick emerge installed references to believe current install is from media-gfx/freecad-0.21.2-r1 in local overlay.
That would make things simpler here, i.e. cpu & power usage friendly,

No idea how to achieve this... Any experience to share?

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "


Last edited by CaptainBlood on Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:59 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22717

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Packages cannot be removed without a git commit. According to git history, 0.21.2-r1 was removed by media-gfx/freecad: fix build with qt6 for bug 920579. I don't see why that was done as a rename to -r2 instead of fixing -r1 in place, since it is documented as a build fix, and the diff seems to agree with it being only a build fix. However, as I do not use this package, I cannot be sure there was not a reason for this rename.

Assuming that the rename was the wrong solution, it seems like the right solution would be to ask the developer to restore -r1, possibly with the fixes that prevent the build failure, or possibly with a REQUIRED_USE to prohibit requesting a known-broken configuration. That would save everyone from the rebuild, rather than only helping your system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3903

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is not ghostly deletion commit indeed, overlooked, sorry.
This thread has been started because bugzilla.

Thus I doubt ebuild will be restored and would like to avoid --exclude freecad on my emerge command line on a daily basis.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22717

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your bug report was closed by a different maintainer than the one who deleted the ebuild. Your report did not explain well why a restoration is justified. I am not surprised that a report with so little explanation was closed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3903

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hu wrote:
Your bug report was closed by a different maintainer than the one who deleted the ebuild. Your report did not explain well why a restoration is justified. I am not surprised that a report with so little explanation was closed.
Well I only discovered recently user can add to email list, now updated.
Since that I counted on bug wanglers to the job.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22717

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Per comment #3, there are changes in the -r1 -> r2 bump that justify a revision bump. Even knowing this, I cannot identify specific hunks that justify a bump, but I defer to the maintainer who knows how to build this package, as I neither use it nor try to build it. It looks like this may be one of those cases where running unstable exposes you to greater churn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3903

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I've compared original r1 from not updated portage tree with final r2.
All changes are qt6 related.
Indirectly new python12+USE=qui requires qt6.

As far as qt5 is concerned, there seems 2 be no changes.

I'm about to rebuild with r2.

Will report whether binary are the same (which is expected) or not.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3903

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hu wrote:
Per comment #3, there are changes in the -r1 -> r2 bump that justify a revision bump. Even knowing this, I cannot identify specific hunks that justify a bump, but I defer to the maintainer who knows how to build this package, as I neither use it nor try to build it. It looks like this may be one of those cases where running unstable exposes you to greater churn.


Bisecting:
Code:
amd64 ~ # diff -C 2 freecad-0.21.2-r1-installed.ebuild freecad-0.21.2-r1-latest.ebuild
*** freecad-0.21.2-r1-installed.ebuild   2024-03-09 22:06:45.671916250 +0300
--- freecad-0.21.2-r1-latest.ebuild   2024-03-09 18:46:13.722379023 +0300
***************
*** 60,63 ****
--- 60,64 ----
     qt6? (
        dev-qt/qtbase:6[concurrent,network,xml]
+       dev-qt/qt5compat:6
     )
     media-libs/freetype
amd64 ~ # diff -C 8 freecad-0.21.2-r1-latest.ebuild /var/db/repos/gentoo/media-gfx/freecad/freecad-0.21.2-r2.ebuild
*** freecad-0.21.2-r1-latest.ebuild   2024-03-09 18:46:13.722379023 +0300
--- /var/db/repos/gentoo/media-gfx/freecad/freecad-0.21.2-r2.ebuild   2024-03-09 13:41:22.000000000 +0300
***************
*** 1,14 ****
  # Copyright 1999-2024 Gentoo Authors
  # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
 
  EAPI=8
 
! PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_{10..12} )
 
  inherit check-reqs cmake optfeature python-single-r1 qmake-utils xdg
 
  DESCRIPTION="QT based Computer Aided Design application"
  HOMEPAGE="https://www.freecad.org/ https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD"
 
  MY_PN=FreeCAD
 
--- 1,14 ----
  # Copyright 1999-2024 Gentoo Authors
  # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
 
  EAPI=8
 
! PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_{10..11} )
 
  inherit check-reqs cmake optfeature python-single-r1 qmake-utils xdg
 
  DESCRIPTION="QT based Computer Aided Design application"
  HOMEPAGE="https://www.freecad.org/ https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD"
 
  MY_PN=FreeCAD
 
***************
*** 54,70 ****
        dev-qt/qtconcurrent:5
        dev-qt/qtcore:5
        dev-qt/qtnetwork:5
        dev-qt/qtxml:5
        dev-qt/qtxmlpatterns:5
     )
     qt6? (
        dev-qt/qtbase:6[concurrent,network,xml]
-       dev-qt/qt5compat:6
     )
     media-libs/freetype
     media-libs/qhull:=
     sci-libs/hdf5:=[fortran,zlib]
     >=sci-libs/med-4.0.0-r1
     sci-libs/opencascade:=[json,vtk]
     sci-libs/orocos_kdl:=
     sys-libs/zlib
--- 54,69 ----
***************
*** 95,110 ****
--- 94,110 ----
              dev-python/matplotlib[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
              >=dev-python/pivy-0.6.5[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
              dev-python/pyside2[gui,svg,webchannel,webengine,${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
              dev-python/shiboken2[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
           ' python3_{10..11} )
        )
        qt6? (
           designer? ( dev-qt/qttools:6[designer] )
+          dev-qt/qt5compat:6
           dev-qt/qttools:6[widgets]
           dev-qt/qtbase:6[gui,opengl,widgets]
           dev-qt/qtsvg:6
           dev-qt/qtwebengine:6[widgets]
           pcl? ( sci-libs/pcl[-qt5,qt6(-)] )
           $(python_gen_cond_dep '
              dev-python/matplotlib[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
              >=dev-python/pivy-0.6.5[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
***************
*** 153,171 ****
  #
  # The increase in auto-enabled workbenches is due to their need in parts of the
  # test suite when compiled with a minimal set of USE flags.
  REQUIRED_USE="
     ${PYTHON_REQUIRED_USE}
     designer? ( gui )
     inspection? ( points )
     path? ( robot )
-    python_single_target_python3_12? ( gui? ( qt6 ) )
  "
- # There is no py3.12 support planned for pyside2
 
  PATCHES=(
     "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-0.21.0-0001-Gentoo-specific-disable-ccache-usage.patch
     "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-0.21.1-Gentoo-specific-don-t-check-vcs.patch
  )
 
  DOCS=( CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md README.md )
 
--- 153,169 ----
***************
*** 190,206 ****
     local mycmakeargs=(
        -DBUILD_ADDONMGR=$(usex addonmgr)
        -DBUILD_ARCH=ON
        -DBUILD_ASSEMBLY=OFF               # deprecated
        -DBUILD_CLOUD=$(usex cloud)
        -DBUILD_COMPLETE=OFF               # deprecated
        -DBUILD_DRAFT=ON
        -DBUILD_DESIGNER_PLUGIN=$(usex designer)
-       -DBUILD_DRAWING=ON
        -DBUILD_ENABLE_CXX_STD:STRING="C++17"   # needed for >=boost-1.77.0
        -DBUILD_FEM=$(usex fem)
        -DBUILD_FEM_NETGEN=$(usex netgen)
        -DBUILD_FLAT_MESH=ON
        -DBUILD_FORCE_DIRECTORY=ON            # force building in a dedicated directory
        -DBUILD_FREETYPE=ON                  # automagic dep
        -DBUILD_GUI=$(usex gui)
        -DBUILD_IDF=$(usex idf)
--- 188,203 ----
***************
*** 275,299 ****
--- 272,300 ----
     if use qt6; then
        mycmakeargs+=(
           -DFREECAD_QT_MAJOR_VERSION=6
           -DFREECAD_QT_VERSION=6
           -DQT_DEFAULT_MAJOR_VERSION=6
           -DQt6Core_MOC_EXECUTABLE="$(qt6_get_bindir)/moc"
           -DQt6Core_RCC_EXECUTABLE="$(qt6_get_bindir)/rcc"
           -DBUILD_QT5=OFF
+          # Drawing module unmaintained and not ported to qt6
+          -DBUILD_DRAWING=OFF
        )
     else
        mycmakeargs+=(
           -DFREECAD_QT_MAJOR_VERSION=5
           -DFREECAD_QT_VERSION=5
           -DQT_DEFAULT_MAJOR_VERSION=5
           -DQt5Core_MOC_EXECUTABLE="$(qt5_get_bindir)/moc"
           -DQt5Core_RCC_EXECUTABLE="$(qt5_get_bindir)/rcc"
           -DBUILD_QT5=ON
+          # Drawing module unmaintained and not ported to qt6
+          -DBUILD_DRAWING=ON
        )
     fi
 
     cmake_src_configure
  }
 
  # We use the FreeCADCmd binary instead of the FreeCAD binary here
  # for two reasons:
Nothing but qt6 related.
Any foppleganger around?

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3903

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My 2 cts qt6 integration is going to be the next new gentoo adventure.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum