Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Llvm_slot??? [solved]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3941

PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2024 11:36 pm    Post subject: Llvm_slot??? [solved] Reply with quote

Code:
[U] dev-libs/opencl-clang
     Available versions: 
     (15)   15.0.0 (~)15.0.0-r1
     (16)   16.0.0-r1 ~16.0.0-r2
       {LLVM_SLOT="+15 +16"}
     Installed versions:  15.0.0(15)(22:43:45 25/01/2024)
Because of keywording ;15 wants to upgrade to 15.0.0-r1.
But it now requires LLVM_SLOT=15 to be defined.

Doing so in make.conf triggers reinstall of media-libs/mesa
Code:
Advised by with LLVM_SLOT="15 16 +17 18" in Available versions.
along with
Installed versions:  24.0.2^t(10:50:17 29/02/2024)(X gles1 gles2 opencl opengl vaapi vdpau wayland zstd -d3d9 -debug -llvm -lm-sensors -osmesa -proprietary-codecs -selinux -test -unwind -valgrind -vulkan -vulkan-overlay -xa -zink ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_S390="-32 -64" ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse2" LLVM_SLOT="-15 -16 -17" VIDEO_CARDS="intel -d3d12 -freedreno -lavapipe -lima -nouveau -panfrost -r300 -r600 -radeon -radeonsi -v3d -vc4 -virgl -vivante -vmware")
Dang!

How to define LLVM_SLOT with per package resolution?
The above media-libs/mesa has been build with LLVM_SLOT="-15 -16 -17" and wants to rebuild now that LLVM_SLOT has be defined.
Any idea?

Is there any place documenting this LLVM_SLOT= from a functional perspective, e.g. not .eclass files which are technical only?

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "


Last edited by CaptainBlood on Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:43 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3941

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dang!
Can't even title as "LLVM_SLOT???"
Automatically converted to "Llvm_slot???"

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3941

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As an example:
Code:
# cat /etc/portage/package.env/dev-libs::opencl-clang.conf
dev-libs/opencl-clang:15 LLVM:15.conf

cat /etc/portage/env/LLVM:15.conf
LLVM_SLOT=15
or
Code:
cat /etc/portage/package.use/dev-libs::opencl-clang.conf
dev-libs/opencl-clang:15 llvm_slot_15


They both solves the issue reported as:
Code:
emerge -1 -p dev-libs/opencl-clang:15

!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "dev-libs/opencl-clang:15" has unmet requirements.
- dev-libs/opencl-clang-15.0.0-r1::gentoo USE="" ABI_X86="(64)" LLVM_SLOT="-15"

  The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
    llvm_slot_15

  The above constraints are a subset of the following complete expression:
    exactly-one-of ( llvm_slot_15 )

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22754

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is the actual problem here? This looks like a USE_EXPAND variable, and those are usually handled by the profile. Assuming it is a USE_EXPAND, then the usual rules for package.use should apply here. However, I wouldn't expect you should need to do anything, since the profile should have a good default here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 3941

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mistaken by forgettting to slot
Code:
equery u dev-libs/opencl-clang
!!! No USE flags found for dev-libs/opencl-clang-16.0.0-r1
as I should have run
Code:
equery u dev-libs/opencl-clang:15
[ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation]
[        : I - package is installed with flag     ]
[ Colors : set, unset                             ]
 * Found these USE flags for dev-libs/opencl-clang-15.0.0-r1:
 U I
 - - llvm_slot_15 : Use LLVM 15.
which is very clear indeed.

Because I noticed a few days back LLVM_SLOT in make.conf dedicated thread, I thought I was the right thing to do.

???profile.... Can you plz elaborate?

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
_________________
USE="-* ..." in /etc/portage/make.conf here, i.e. a countermeasure to portage implicit braces, belt & diaper paradigm
LT: "I've been doing a passable imitation of the Fontana di Trevi, except my medium is mucus. Sooo much mucus. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 22754

PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On further investigation, this is not a profile issue. I find no evidence that the profile automatically manages LLVM_SLOT. Rather, this is automatically managed in eclass/llvm-r1.eclass, which sets up the IUSE for the package and default-enables the "best" slot, according to some internal rules for what it considers best. From a cursory read, it appears that "best" means "newest within constraints about stable versus unstable."

Since this is default-enabled in the IUSE, it would normally be handled automatically. I suspect that this is another of the systems that you impaired with a global USE=-*, although you did not mention that this system is affected by that. Don't do that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum