View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bzipitidoo n00b
Joined: 26 Feb 2022 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2024 3:05 pm Post subject: mitigations for overheating? |
|
|
The biggest problem I'm having with Gentoo is that my hardware can't take hours of sustained building without overheating, and locking up hard. 2 hours, yes, it can sustain that, but not 8 hours, can't leave it running all night long doing builds.
To get a big package such as Chromium to finish building, I have resorted to an old trick of using ctrl-s to pause the terminal output and thus the build for an hour or so, to give the computer a chance to cool down. (ctrl-q resumes.) If I don't do that in time, and end up having to cut the power, then when the computer has recovered the Gentoo build system starts over on the big package. Is there any way to resume within a package build? It's painful to have reached 40,000 out of nearly 60,000 tasks on the building of Chromium, and have to start over because the computer overheated at that point. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sbeem n00b
Joined: 16 Apr 2024 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2024 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
According to https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-792914.html you can just:
Code: | ebuild (package) compile |
to pick up where you left off.
Personally I think if you're having difficulty with overheating due to compiling large packages, you have a reasonable excuse to use binary packages. You could try https://gpo.zugaina.org/www-client/ungoogled-chromium-bin for Chromium.
Also if your issue is overheating, you might want to address that problem directly. Replace your thermal paste, clean the dust, add or replace fans. Unless that's not an option, then I'd just stick with binary packages.
Lastly, if you really want to stick to compiling everything, you could try compiling for your target on a different machine: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Cross_build_environment, https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Crossdev or even setting up distcc: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc
Last edited by sbeem on Sat Apr 20, 2024 4:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
molletts Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Feb 2013 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2024 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried reducing the number of threads in use for those packages (you can use files in /etc/portage/env and /etc/portage/package.env to override MAKEOPTS for specific packages)? That should reduce the power dissipation of the CPU a bit and may help keep the temperature under control. I have to limit ffmpeg runs (which can produce considerably more heat than compile jobs, maybe due to the use of AVX instructions) to 6 or even 4 threads in hot weather to prevent my PC from overheating.
I assume there's nothing you can do to improve cooling. (If it's a laptop, have you tried using a laptop cooler?)
Stephen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54572 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2024 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | (If it's a laptop, have you tried using a laptop cooler?) |
That's two thick books to let air circulate under the laptop. :)
I used to run a P3 laptop on edge to make the most of the chimney effect, and have airflow at the 'bottom', now the side. _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JustAnother Apprentice
Joined: 23 Sep 2016 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
First, go inside and blow out the dust. Don't overrev the fan blade (back emf effect).
If it is a laptop, get a stand with a large 6" fan. Spins slower, and is quieter, and the wear rate scales a a power of the spin rate.
And/or: use some 1x2 wood or erasers to prop the laptop at least half an inch off any surface.
If you have a stand, make sure the stand is propped up the same amount.
A cheap USB fan could blow air under the stand and possibly help.
If it is a desktop, install another fan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Genone Retired Dev
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 9604 Location: beyond the rim
|
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Depending on your hardware, potentially just reduce the thermal and/or power limits of your CPU. Modern LGA1700 boards in particular tend to ignore Intels specs for those limits and will happily let the CPUs consume as much power as possible for as long as they want, which obviously results in tons of heat.
Other than that, check your cooling solution: in case of a desktop, clean the case, coolers and fans from dust, if it is an older system maybe dismount the cooler and apply some new thermal paste. Or add some additional fans to get the heat out of the system.
If it is a laptop then obviously your options are more limited, still removing dust and ensuring air intake and outlets are free may help.
As for reducing load, as has been mentioned you could simply reduce the number of parallel build jobs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can lower these settings in /etc/portage/make.conf
Code: | MAKEOPTS="-j8 -l5"
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs=1 --load-average=5 --autounmask=n" |
Also, use of nice, if nice enough, will keep the heat down.
Solve systemic problem if possible. All the advice about fans and thermal paste are spot on. Quick and dirty for a desktop = take cover off and aim a fan at it. _________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pa4wdh l33t
Joined: 16 Dec 2005 Posts: 881
|
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some time ago i had a similar problem, only in my case the CPU/mainboard was fanless.
I wrote a small daemon to scale down the cpufreq max frequency depending on the CPU temperature, right now it keeps my CPU around 70 degrees Celsius while the emerge -e world is running for the 23.0 profile update.
It might be useful for your use case too, you can find it here: https://code.pa4wdh.nl.eu.org/tools/cputemp2maxfreq/about/ _________________ The gentoo way of bringing peace to the world:
USE="-war" emerge --newuse @world
My shared code repository: https://code.pa4wdh.nl.eu.org
Music, Free as in Freedom: https://www.jamendo.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hu Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 22578
|
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice only encourages the system to prefer scheduling other applications more favorably than the nice one. A nice process with no competition can still run the system at full load. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
figueroa Advocate
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 3005 Location: Edge of marsh USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hu wrote: | Nice only encourages the system to prefer scheduling other applications more favorably than the nice one. A nice process with no competition can still run the system at full load. |
Good point. Thanks for the correction. Mea culpa. _________________ Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ralphred l33t
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 631
|
Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2024 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
pa4wdh wrote: | I wrote a small daemon to scale down the cpufreq max frequency depending on the CPU temperature |
I did exactly the same thing, only in bash, in a hurry, so it's horrible code, use pa4wdh's. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|