View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
maiku Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 590 Location: Escaping from NY
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 2:49 pm Post subject: Redundant local external storage that's not always on |
|
|
I need a local configuration where I can store data with the following considerations.
1) It's really just local.
2) I can easily use it on another at least Linux machine.
3) Has redundancy so it can suffer at least partial failure.
4) Is encrypted.
5) Can be powered on only when I need it (which will not be enough times to justify a NAS in my mind).
6) Does not require an infinite money budget.
In my primitive mind the only thing I know that serves this purpose is USB so I default to getting a dumb USB enclosure that supports 2 drives and buying two rust platter drives and putting them in a ZFS RAID, etc.
Is there a better way? Seems like the pitfalls of ZFS RAID over USB might make things interesting. _________________ Michael |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pingtoo Veteran
Joined: 10 Sep 2021 Posts: 1128 Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If there is no performance requirement. I would suggest use two USB storage and just ext4. redundancy is base on automated file system level copy.
This way you can have long longevity as well as easy to move, plus possible versioning to reduce human error. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lars_the_bear Guru
Joined: 05 Jun 2024 Posts: 423
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 3:01 pm Post subject: Re: Redundant local external storage that's not always on |
|
|
Quote: |
5) Can be powered on only when I need it (which will not be enough times to justify a NAS in my mind).
|
My Raspberry Pi 3 NAS draws less than 500mA at idle, and the disks spin down when not in use. Obviously it's a higher energy usage than an uplugged USB stick, but it's something I'm willing to tolerate for the convenience.
I offset the energy wastage by making one fewer car journey a year
BR, Lars. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|